Abstract
Surgical simulation avoids practicing skills in patients, allowing trainees to learn in a safe, controlled, and standardized environment. Current robotic surgical simulators available include virtual reality simulators, human cadavers, and live animals. The use of cadavers has the highest possible fidelity available to practice entire operations. Nevertheless, their cost, availability, tissue compliance, and infection risk outweigh the advantages of cadaver models. Drawbacks of using live animals include anatomical differences with humans, high costs due to their housing and handling requirements, and ethical concerns. We designed a novel robotic surgical simulator based on porcine perfused tissue blocks that allows the simulation of entire surgical procedures. Our simulation allows trainees to increase familiarity with the robotic console and its controls, as well as with the docking process. It provides an opportunity to learn not only universal skills needed in robotic surgery, such as camera and instrument targeting, but also to perform complete surgical procedures such as an antireflux procedure. The adoption of robotic simulation curricula with realistic models will decrease overall operative time while increasing resident participation.
References
Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Hart IR et al (1999) Simulation technology for health care professional skills training and assessment. JAMA 282(9):861–866
Aggarwal R, Mytton OT, Derbrew M et al (2010) Training and simulation for patient safety. Qual Saf Health Care 2:i34–i43
Reznick RK, MacRae H (2006) Teaching surgical skills–changes in the wind. N Engl J Med 355(25):2664–2669
Kenngott HG, Fischer L, Nickel F et al (2012) Status of robotic assistance–a less traumatic and more accurate minimally invasive surgery? Langenbecks Arch Surg 397(3):333–341
Schootman M, Hendren S, Ratnapradipa K et al (2016) Adoption of robotic technology for treating colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 59(11):1011–1018
Tanaka A, Graddy C, Simpson K et al (2016) Robotic surgery simulation validity and usability comparative analysis. Surg Endosc 30(9):3720–3729
Foell K, Furse A, Honey RJ et al (2013) Multidisciplinary validation study of the da Vinci Skills Simulator: educational tool and assessment device. J Robot Surg 7(4):365–369
Rehman S, Raza SJ, Stegemann AP et al (2013) Simulation-based robot-assisted surgical training: a health economic evaluation. Int J Surg 11(9):841–846
Mehaffey JH, Michaels AD, Mullen MG et al (2017) Adoption of robotics in a general surgery residency program: at what cost? J Surg Res 213:269–273
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Francisco Schlottmann, MD declares that he has no conflict of interest. Marco G. Patti, MD declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.
Statement of human and animal rights
This study does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schlottmann, F., Patti, M.G. Novel simulator for robotic surgery. J Robotic Surg 11, 463–465 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-017-0746-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-017-0746-5