Skip to main content
Log in

Robot-assisted vasovasostomy using a single layer anastomosis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Robotic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Of all patients who have vasectomies performed in the United States, upwards of 6% will pursue a vasectomy reversal. Currently, the gold-standard reversal procedure is a microscopic vasovasostomy utilizing either a one or two-layer vasal anastomosis. Unfortunately, most urologists do not perform these procedures as they require extensive training and experience in microsurgery. The objective of our study was to evaluate the feasibility and success rate of robot-assisted vasovasostomy performed at our institution. We completed a retrospective review of our experience with vasectomy reversal utilizing the da Vinci® Surgical System and a single layer vasal anastomosis. A successful reversal was defined as a return of sperm on semen analysis or light microscopy. Since 2009 we have completed 79 robotic vasectomy reversals, 60 of which utilized a single-layer vasal anastomosis. The average obstructive interval was 5.7 ± 2.2 years. Average operative time was 192 min. 42 patients returned for a post-operative semen evaluation at an average time of 4.3 months post-procedure revealing a success rate of 88% (37 out of 42). Post-operative semen parameters were significant for an average sperm density of 31.0 million/mL with an average motility of 29.1%. Robot-assisted vasovasostomy with a single layer anastomosis has overall success rates that are similar to that of reported microscopic vasovasostomy rates. Although more study is warranted with regard to cost, we feel as though our study demonstrates an alternative approach to vasectomy reversal that can be performed successfully by urologists trained in robotic surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

VV:

Vasovasostomy

MVV:

Microscopic vasovasostomy

RAVV:

Robot-assisted vasovasostomy

sRAVV:

Single-layer anastomosis robot-assisted vasovasostomy

References

  1. Eisenberg ML, Henderson JT, Amory JK, Smith JF, Walsh TJ (2009) Racial differences in vasectomy utilization in the United States: data from the national survey of family growth. Urology 74(5):1020–1024

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Eisenberg ML, Lipshultz LI (2010) Estimating the number of vasectomies performed annually in the United States: data from the National Survey of Family Growth. J Urol 184(5):2068–2072

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Potts JM, Pasqualotto FF, Nelson D, Thomas AJ, Agarwal A (1999) Patient characteristics associated with vasectomy reversal. J Urol 161(6):1835–1839

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Meng MV, Greene KL, Turek PJ (2005) Surgery or assisted reproduction? A decision analysis of treatment costs in male infertility. J Urol 174(5):1926–1931 (discussion 1931)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Santomauro MG, Choe CH, L’Esperance JO, Auge BK (2012) Robotic vasovasostomy: description of technique and review of initial results. J Robot Surg 6(3):217–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim HH, Goldstein M (2009) History of vasectomy reversal. Urol Clin North Am 36(3):359–373

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Silber SJ (1975) Microsurgery in clinical urology. Urology 6(2):150–153

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Belker AM, Thomas AJ, Fuchs EF, Konnak JW, Sharlip ID (1991) Results of 1,469 microsurgical vasectomy reversals by the Vasovasostomy Study Group. J Urol 145(3):505–511

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Herrel LA, Goodman M, Goldstein M, Hsiao W (2015) Outcomes of microsurgical vasovasostomy for vasectomy reversal: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Urology 85(4):819–825

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schoor RA, Ross L, Niederberger C (2003) Robotic assisted microsurgical vasal reconstruction in a model system. World J Urol 21(1):48–49

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kuang W, Shin PR, Matin S, Thomas AJ (2004) Initial evaluation of robotic technology for microsurgical vasovasostomy. J Urol 171(1):300–303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schiff J, Li PS, Goldstein M (2004) Robotic microsurgical vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy: a prospective randomized study in a rat model. J Urol 171(4):1720–1725

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fleming C (2004) Robot-assisted vasovasostomy. Urol Clin North Am 31(4):769–772

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Parekattil SJ, Atalah HN, Cohen MS (2010) Video technique for human robot-assisted microsurgical vasovasostomy. J Endourol 24(4):511–514

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Parekattil SJ, Gudeloglu A, Brahmbhatt J, Wharton J, Priola KB (2012) Robotic assisted versus pure microsurgical vasectomy reversal: technique and prospective database control trial. J Reconstr Microsurg 28(7):435–444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yang G, Walsh TJ, Shefi S, Turek PJ (2007) The kinetics of the return of motile sperm to the ejaculate after vasectomy reversal. J Urol 177(6):2272–2276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Safarinejad MR, Lashkari MH, Asgari SA, Farshi A, Babaei AR (2013) Comparison of macroscopic one-layer over number 1 nylon suture vasovasostomy with the standard two-layer microsurgical procedure. Hum Fertil (Camb) 16(3):194–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jee SH, Hong YK (2010) One-layer vasovasostomy: microsurgical versus loupe-assisted. Fertil Steril 94(6):2308–2311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael T. Marshall.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Drs. Marshall, Doudt, Berger, Auge, Christman, and Choe declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Disclosures

The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Navy, Department of Defense, or the United States Government. The authors are military service members. This work was prepared as part of their official duties. Title 17, USC, § 105 provides that ‘Copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of the United States Government.’ Title 17, USC, § 101 defines a U.S. Government work as a work prepared by a military service member or employee of the U.S. Government as part of that person’s official duties.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marshall, M.T., Doudt, A.D., Berger, J.H. et al. Robot-assisted vasovasostomy using a single layer anastomosis. J Robotic Surg 11, 299–303 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-016-0653-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-016-0653-1

Keywords

Navigation