Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Does previous transurethral prostate surgery affect oncologic and continence outcomes after RARP?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Robotic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examined the effect of previous transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) on multiple oncologic and continence outcomes after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). We performed a retrospective cohort study of a total of 2693 patients from 2007 to 2014 who underwent RARP. Patients were stratified into 49 patients who had previous TURP prior to RARP (group 1) and 2644 patients who had no TURP prior to RARP (group 2). We collected operative variables including estimated blood loss, operative time, and positive surgical margin (PSM) rates. Urinary continence, defined as 0 pads per day (PPD), and social continence, defined as 1-PPD, were also assessed. American Urological Association Symptoms Score (AUASS), overall ability to function sexually, and Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) questionnaire were evaluated at 3 and 12 months after RARP. Weakness of urinary stream (EPIC #4d) at 12 months imposed a greater problem for group 1 patients with prior TURP compared to group 2 patients without prior TURP (p = 0.012). PSM was not statistically significant between the two groups (p = 0.110). Group 1 patients had a greater PSM rate (30.61 %) as compared to group 2 (20.95 %). PSM locations in group 1 patients showed the most common locations at the posterior and apex. The difference between the two groups for AUASS, overall sexual function, estimated blood loss, operative time, urinary continence, and social continence was not statistically significant. We examined the effect of previous TURP on postoperative RARP continence and oncologic outcomes. This data can be used to counsel those with prior TURP before RARP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gupta NP, Singh P, Nayyar R (2011) Outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in men with previous transurethral resection of prostate. BJU Int 108(9):1501–1505

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Campbell MF et al (2012) Campbell-Walsh urology, vol 3, 10th edn. Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  3. Martin AD et al (2009) Does a history of previous surgery or radiation to the prostate affect outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy? BJU Int 103(12):1696–1698

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bernstein AJ et al (2008) Robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy after TURP: a multi-institutional analysis of oncologic and quality of life outcomes. J Urol 179(4, Supplement):347

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ramon J et al (1994) Morbidity of radical retropubic prostatectomy following previous prostate resection. J Surg Oncol 55(1):14–19

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Katz R et al (2006) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in patients following transurethral resection of the prostate. Urol Int 77(3):216–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bujons Tur A et al (2006) Radical prostatectomy in patients with history of transurethral resection of the prostate. Arch Esp Urol 59(5):473–478

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bandhauer K, Senn E (1988) Radical retropubic prostatectomy after transurethral prostatic resection. Eur Urol 15(3–4):180–181

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Leewansangtong S, Taweemonkongsap T (2006) Is laparoscopic radical prostatectomy after transurethral prostatectomy appropriated? J Med Assoc Thai 89(8):1146–1149

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jaffe J et al (2007) Surgical outcomes for men undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy after transurethral resection of the prostate. J Urol 178(2):483–487 (discussion 487)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Colombo R et al (2006) Radical prostatectomy after previous prostate surgery: clinical and functional outcomes. J Urol 176(6 Pt 1):2459–2463 (discussion 2463)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hampton LJ et al (2008) Patients with prior turp undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy have higher positive surgical margin rates. J Urol 179(4, Supplement):606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gacci M et al (2013) The impact of prior TURP on radical prostatectomy surgical margins: a multicenter analysis. Urol Int 91(1):62–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ficarra V et al (2007) Evidence from robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review. Eur Urol 51(1):45–55 (discussion 56)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Palisaar JR et al (2009) Open radical retropubic prostatectomy gives favourable surgical and functional outcomes after transurethral resection of the prostate. BJU Int 104(5):611–615

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hung CF, Yang CK, Ou YC (2014) Robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy following transurethral resection of the prostate: perioperative, oncologic and functional outcomes. Prostate Int 2(2):82–89

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Menard J et al (2008) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy after transurethral resection of the prostate: surgical and functional outcomes. Urology 72(3):593–597

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Muschter R, Bach T, Seitz M (2013) [Transurethral resection of the prostate and current modifications (bipolar, electrovaporization)]. Urologe A 52(3):331–338

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ploussard G et al (2009) Is robot assistance affecting operating room time compared with pure retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy? J Endourol 23(6):939–943

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David I. Lee.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Yu-Kai Su, Benjamin F. Katz, Shailen S. Sehgal, Sue-Jean S. Yu, Yu-Chen Su, Andrew Lightfoot, Ziho Lee, Elton Llukani, Kelly Monahan, and David I. Lee declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from Yu-Kai Su, Benjamin F. Katz, Shailen S. Sehgal, Sue-Jean S. Yu, Yu-Chen Su, Andrew Lightfoot, Ziho Lee, Elton Llukani, Kelly Monahan, and David I. Lee. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Su, YK., Katz, B.F., Sehgal, S.S. et al. Does previous transurethral prostate surgery affect oncologic and continence outcomes after RARP?. J Robotic Surg 9, 291–297 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-015-0529-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-015-0529-9

Keywords

Navigation