Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Robotic transperitoneal ilioinguinal pelvic lymphadenectomy for high-risk melanoma: an update of 18-month follow-up

  • Letter to the editor
  • Published:
Journal of Robotic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Sohn W, Finley DS, Jakowatz J, Ornstein DK (2010) Robot-assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal pelvic lymphadenectomy and metastasectomy for melanoma: initial report of two cases. J Robot Surg 4(2):129–132

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pellegrino A, Damiani GR, Terruzzi M, Strippoli D, Bigi L (2013) Robot-assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal deep pelvic lymphadenectomy for metastatic melanoma of the lower limb: initial report of four cases and outcomes at 1-year follow-up. Updates Surg 65(4):339–340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hughes TMD, Thomas JM (1999) Combined inguinal and pelvic lymph node dissection for stage III melanoma. Br J Surg 86:1493–1498

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Coit DG, Rogatko A, Brennan MF (1991) Prognostic factors in patients with melanoma metastatic to axillary or inguinal lymph nodes. A multivariate analysis. Ann Surg 214:627–636

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Singletary SE, Shallenberger R, Guinee VF (1992) Surgical management of groin nodal metastases from primary melanoma of the lower extremity. Surg Gynecol Obstet 174:195–200

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mann GB, Coit DG (1999) Does the extent of operation influence the prognosis in patients with melanoma metastatic to inguinal nodes? Ann Surg Oncol 6:263–271

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gala RB, Margulies R, Steinberg A, Murphy M, Lukban J, Jeppson P, Aschkenazi S, Olivera C, South M, Lowenstein L, Schaffer J, Balk EM, Sung V.A (2013) Systematic review of robotic surgery in gynecology: robotic techniques compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.11.010 [Epub ahead of print]

  8. Huang KH, Carter SC, Shih YC, Hu JC (2013) Robotic and standard open radical prostatectomy: oncological and quality-of-life outcomes. J Comp Eff Res 2(3):293–299. doi:10.2217/cer.13.23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Liss MA, Palazzi K, Stroup SP, Jabaji R, Raheem OA, Kane CJ (2013) Outcomes and complications of pelvic lymph node dissection during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. World J Urol 31(3):481–488. doi:10.1007/s00345-013-1056-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Solberg A, Angelsen A, Bergan U, Haugen OA, Viset T, Klepp O (2003) Frequency of lymphoceles after open and laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection in patients with prostate cancer. Scand J Urol Nephrol 37(3):218–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

Antonio Pellegrino, Damiani Ginalucaraffaello, Davide Strippoli and Fabrizio Fantini declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standards

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study. Additional informed consent was obtained from all patients for which identifying information is included in this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gianluca Raffaello Damiani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pellegrino, A., Damiani, G.R., Strippoli, D. et al. Robotic transperitoneal ilioinguinal pelvic lymphadenectomy for high-risk melanoma: an update of 18-month follow-up. J Robotic Surg 8, 189–191 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-014-0457-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-014-0457-0

Keywords

Navigation