Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Mental stress experienced by first-year residents and expert surgeons with robotic and laparoscopic surgery interfaces

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Robotic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prior research has indicated that novices experienced a beneficial stress profile in the robotic surgery (da Vinci) training environment when compared to the laparoscopic surgery training environment. The objective of this study was to assess whether this finding generalizes to expert surgeons. Towards that end, first-year residents’ and attending surgeons’ performances and subjective stress experiences were assessed in a surgical training task that was performed with the da Vinci and laparoscopic surgery interfaces. This study indicated that both groups exhibited superior performance and lower stress with the da Vinci surgical system than the laparoscopic system. The results provide further support for the sensitivity of the Dundee Stress State Questionnaire in identifying different stress responses experienced by trainees and experts in the minimally invasive surgery environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Varela JE, WilsonSE Nguyen NT (2010) Laparoscopic surgery significantly reduces surgical-site infections compared with open surgery. Surg Endosc 24:270–276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cuschieri A (1995) Whither minimal access surgery: tribulations and expectations? Am J Surg 169:9–19

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mattei P (2007) Minimally invasive surgery in the diagnosis and treatment of abdominal pain in children. Curr Opin Pediatr 19:338–343

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Reinhardt-Rutland AH, Annett JM, Gifford M (1999) Depth perception and indirect viewing: reflections on minimally invasive surgery. Int J Cogn Ergon 3:77–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gallagher AG, McClure N, McGuigan J, Ritchie K, Sheehy NP (1998) An ergonomic analysis of the fulcrum effect in the acquisition of endoscopic skills. Endoscopy 30:617–620

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cunningham HA (1989) Aiming error under transformed spatial mappings suggests a structure for visual-motor maps. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 15:493–506

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Welch RB, Bridgeman B, Anand S, Browman K (1993) Alternating prism exposure causes dual adaptation and generalization to a novel displacement. Percept Psychophys 54:195–204

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rassweiler J, Frede T (2002) Geometrie der laparoskopie, telechirurgie, training und telementoring. Urologe A 41:131–143

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Reyes JM, Smaldone MC, Uzzo RG, Viterbo R (2012) Current status of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. Curr Urol Rep 13:24–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rassweiler J, Hruza M, Teber D, Su LM (2006) Laparoscopic and robotic assisted radical prostatectomy—critical analysis of the results. Eur Urol 49:612–624

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hockey GRJ (1997) Compensatory control in the regulation of human performance understress and high workload: a cognitive-energetical framework. Biol Psychol 45:73–93

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Frankenhaeuser M (1986) A psychobiological framework for research on human stress and coping. In: Appley MH, Trumbull R (eds) Dynamics of stress: physiological, psychological, and social perspectives. Plenum Press, New York, pp 101–116

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Matthews G, Joyner L, Gilliland K, Campbell S, Falconer S, Huggins J (1999) Validation of a comprehensive stress state questionnaire: Towards a state “Big Three”. In: Mervielde I, Deary TJ, De Fryt F, Ostendorf F (eds) Personality psychology in Europe, vol 7. Tilburg University Press, Tilburg, pp 335–350

    Google Scholar 

  14. Matthews G, Campbell SE, Falconer S (2001) Assessment of motivational states in performance environments. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol 45, pp 906–91

  15. Matthews G, Campbell SE, Falconer S, Joyner LA, Huggins J, Gilliland K, Grier R, Warm JS (2002) Fundamental dimensions of subjective state in performance settings: task engagement, distress, and worry. Emotion 2:315–340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Klein MI, Warm JS, Riley MA, Matthews G, Gaitonde K, Donovan JF (2008) Perceptual distortions produce multidimensional stress profiles in novice users of an endoscopic surgery simulator. Hum Factors 50:291–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Klein MI, Warm JS, Riley MA, Matthews G, Doarn C, Donovan JF, Gaitonde K (2012) Mental workload and stress perceived by novice operators in the laparoscopic and robotic minimally invasive surgical interfaces. J Endourol 26:1089–1094

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wetzel CM, Kneebone RL, Woloshynowych M, Nestel D, Moorthy K, Kidd J, Darzi A (2006) The effects of stress on surgical performance. Am J Surg 191:5–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Arora S, Sevdalis N, Nestel D, Tierney T, Woloshynowych M, Kneebone R (2009) Managing intraoperative stress: what do surgeons want from a crisis training program? Am J Surg 197:537–543

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zuckerman M (1976) General and situation-specific traits and states: new approaches to assessment of anxiety and other constructs. In: Zuckerman M, Spielberger CD (eds) Emotions and anxiety: new concepts, methods, and applications. Lawrence Erlbaum, Oxford, pp 133–174

    Google Scholar 

  21. Matthews G, Westerman SJ (1994) Energy and tension as predictors of controlled visual and memory search. Pers Individ Dif 17:617–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a grant awarded by Intuitive Surgical, Inc. to Martina I. Klein.

Conflict of interest

Dr. Wren previously served as a consultant and currently serves as a proctor for Intuitive Surgical, Inc. Dr. Gaitonde has served previously as a proctor for Intuitive Surgical, Inc. The remaining authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martina I. Klein.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klein, M.I., Mouraviev, V., Craig, C. et al. Mental stress experienced by first-year residents and expert surgeons with robotic and laparoscopic surgery interfaces. J Robotic Surg 8, 149–155 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-013-0446-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-013-0446-8

Keywords

Navigation