Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomies: early experience and review of the literature

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Robotic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With over 80,000 patients in the United States awaiting kidney transplantation, renal transplant surgery continues to evolve with attractive surgical options for living donation, which include laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) and robotic-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (RALDN). LDN is currently accepted as the gold standard procedure for living donor nephrectomy; RALDN is an evolving technique and may emerge as a preferred procedure over time. We present our initial experience with RALDN from December 2007 to August 2008. Thirty-five patients who underwent RALND were retrospectively analyzed and compared with 35 age- and time (year)-matched patients who underwent LDN. The parameters analyzed were length of hospital stay (3.2 ± 0.9 days, P < 0.59), estimated blood loss (146 ± 363 ml, P < 0.36), operating time (149 ± 44 min, P < 0.23), cold ischemic time (135 ± 202 min, P < 0.19), preoperative creatinine (0.82 ± 0.26 mg/dl, P < 0.46) and postoperative creatinine (1.44 ± 1.03 mg/dl, P < 0.20). There was no statistical difference between RALDN patients with single renal artery (n = 27) and those with more than one renal artery (n = 8) kidneys. There was one serious complication requiring conversion to open laparotomy to control a bleeding renal artery stump following extraction of the kidney. One-year graft survival for the 35 recipients of RALDN was 97.1%. RALDN is feasible and compares favorably to the standard LDN procedure with good graft survival. Robotic-assisted transplant surgery is an emerging technique with potential benefits to both surgeon and patient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ratner LE, Ciseck LJ, Moore RG, Cigarroa FG, Kaufman HS, Kavoussi LR (1995) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 60:1047–1049

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing (OPTN/UNOS). http://www.unos.org. Accessed 12 July 2010

  3. Schnitzler MA, Whiting JF, Brennan DC, Lin G, Chapman W, Lowell J, Boxerman S, Hardinger KL, Kalo Z (2003) The expanded criteria donor dilemma in cadaveric renal transplantation. Transplantation 75:1940–1945

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rocca X, Espinoza O, Hidalgo F, Gonzalez F (2005) Laparoscopic nephrectomy: safe and comfortable surgical alternative for living donors and for good results of graft function. Transplant Proc 37:3349–3350

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kaul S, Menon M (2005) Robotics in laparoscopic urology. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 14:62–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Horgan S, Vanuno D, Sileri P, Cicalese L, Benedetti E (2002) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy for kidney transplantation. Transplantation 73:1474–1479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Renoult E, Hubert J, Ladriere M, Billaut N, Mourey E, Feuillu B, Kessler M (2006) Robot-assisted laparoscopic and open live-donor nephrectomy: a comparison of donor morbidity and early renal allograft outcomes. Nephrol Dial Transplant 21:472–477

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hubert J, Renoult E, Mourey E, Frimat L, Cormier L, Kessler M (2007) Complete robotic-assistance during laparoscopic living donor nephrectomies: an evaluation of 38 procedures at a single site. Int J Urol 14:986–989

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Horgan S, Benedetti E, Moser F (2004) Robotically assisted donor nephrectomy for kidney transplantation. Am J Surg 188(4A Suppl):45S–51S

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Horgan S, Galvani C, Gorodner MV, Jacobsen GR, Moser F, Manzelli A, Oberholzer J, Fisichella MP, Bogetti D, Testa G, Sankary HN, Benedetti E (2007) Effect of robotic assistance on the “learning curve” for laparoscopic hand-assisted donor nephrectomy. Surg Endosc 21:1512–1517

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gorodner V, Horgan S, Galvani C, Manzelli A, Oberholzer J, Sankary H, Testa G, Benedetti E (2006) Routine left robotic-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is safe and effective regardless of the presence of vascular anomalies. Transpl Int 19:636–640

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gill IS, Canes D, Aron M, Haber GP, Goldfarb DA, Flechner S, Desai MR, Kaouk JH, Desai MM (2008) Single port transumbilical (E-NOTES) donor nephrectomy. J Urol 180:637–641

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Desai MM, Berger AK, Brandina R, Aron M, Irwin BH, Canes D, Desai MR, Rao PP, Sotelo R, Stein R, Gill IS (2009) Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: initial hundred patients. Urology 74:805–813

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ganpule AP, Dhawan DR, Kurien A, Sabnis RB, Mishra SK, Muthu V, Desai MR (2009) Laparoendoscopic single-site donor nephrectomy: a single-center experience. Urology 74:1238–1241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Canes D, Berger A, Aron M, Brandina R, Goldfarb DA, Shoskes D, Desai MM, Gill IS (2010) Laparo-endoscopic single site (LESS) versus standard laparoscopic left donor nephrectomy: matched-pair comparison. Eur Urol 57:95–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Desai M (2009) Single-port surgery for donor nephrectomy: a new era in laparoscopic surgery? Nat Clin Pract Urol 6:1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prakash R. Paragi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Geffner, S., Klaassen, Z., Tichauer, M. et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomies: early experience and review of the literature. J Robotic Surg 5, 115–120 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-011-0245-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-011-0245-z

Keywords

Navigation