Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Robot-assisted laparoscopic gastrectomy with D2 dissection for adenocarcinoma: initial experience with 17 patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Robotic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Robot-assisted gastrectomy has been practised so far in very few centres in the world. The aims of this study were to assess the feasibility of robot-assisted gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma with D2 lymph nodal dissection and to analyze our preliminary results. Between January 2006 and August 2008, as many as 17 patients (11 females, 6 males) underwent laparoscopic robot-assisted surgery for non-metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach by a 3-armed da Vinci® Robotic Surgical System. The mean age of patients was 65.9 years. This series included eight patients with early gastric cancer (EGC) and nine with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). A 4/5 laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy (LSG) with D2 nodal clearance was the procedure of choice for 16 distal cancers. Laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) with D2 lymphadenectomy was performed for one AGC of the middle third of the stomach. No intraoperative complication was registered. Conversion to laparotomy was required in two patients with distal cancer. The mean operating time (excluding converted patients) was 352 min (348 for LSG). Morbidity consisted in one pancreatic leak that healed conservatively. One death occurred postoperatively for haemorragic stroke. On average, 25.5 ± 4 lymph nodes were collected (range 10–40). The resection margin was 6.4 ± 0.6 cm (range 4.2–8), and the margin was tumour free in all the specimens. The mean hospital stay of totally laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy was 10 ± 1.2 days (range 8–13). The mean follow-up was 14 months (range 1–29) and three patients with AGC showed recurrence after LSG and died of disease. Robotics in gastrectomy for cancer is a feasible and safe procedure, yielding adequate D2 nodal clearance with respect of oncologic principles. Robotic techniques can represent a remarkable tool to improve laparoscopic surgeon’s ability and precision in small surgical fields, i.e. during D2 dissection. This study demonstrated the feasibility of robot-assisted gastrectomy for cancer although further studies are required to validate our preliminary results, especially as far as patients’ benefits are concerned.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson C, Ellenhorn J, Hellan M et al (2007) Pilot series of robot-assisted laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 21:1662–1666

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson C, Ellenhorn J, Pigazzi A (2008) Robotic gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer, Chap. 22. In : Medical robotics (2008). Vanja Bozovic. I-Tech Education and Publishing, Vienna, pp 305–314

  3. Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M et al (2003) Robotics in general surgery. Arch Surg 138:777–784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hashizume M, Sugimachi K (2003) Robot-assisted gastric surgery. Surg Clin North Am 83:1429–1444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kakeij Y, Konishi K, Ieiri S et al (2006) Robotic laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: a comparison of the da Vinci and Zeus systems. Int J Med Robot 2:299–304

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hockstein NG, Gourin CG, Faust RA et al (2007) A history of robots: from science fiction to surgical robotics. J Robotic Surg 1:113–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mehrabi A, Yetimoglu CL, Nickkholgh A et al (2006) Development and evaluation of a training module for the clinical introduction of the da Vinci robotic system in visceral and vascular surgery. Surg Endosc 20:1376–1382

    Google Scholar 

  8. Eguchi T, Takahashi Y, Ikarashi M et al (2000) Is extended lymph node dissection necessary for gastric cancer in elderly patients? Eur J Surg 166:949–953

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hochwald SN, Brennan MF, Klimstra DS et al (1999) Is lymphadenectomy necessary for early gastric cancer? Ann Surg Oncol 6:664–670

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Yoshikawa T, Tsuburaya A, Kobayashi O et al (2002) Is D2 lymph node dissection necessary for early gastric cancer? Ann Surg Oncol 9:401–405

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Saragoni L, Gaudio M, Morgagni P et al (2000) The role of growth patterns, according to Kodama’s classification, and lymph node status, as important prognostic factors in early gastric cancers: analysis of 412 cases. Gastric Cancer 3:134–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (1998) Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma 2nd English edition Gastric cancer 1:10–24

  13. Huscher CG, Mingoli A, Sgarzini G et al (2007) Totally laparoscopic total and subtotal gastrectomy with extended lymph node dissection for early and advanced gastric cancer: early and long-term results of a 100 patient series. Am J Surg 194:839–844

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kitano S, Shiraishi N, Ichiro U et al, The Japanese Laparoscopic Surgery Study Group (2007) A Multicenter study on oncologic outcome of laparoscopic gastrectomy for early cancer in Japan. Ann Surg 245:68–72

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mochiki E, Kaniyama Y, Aihara R et al (2005) Laparoscopic assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Five years’ experience. Surgery 137:317–322

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pugliese R, Maggioni D, Sansonna F et al (2007) Total and subtotal laparoscopic gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma. Surg Endosc 21:21–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Pugliese R, Maggioni D, Sansonna F et al (2008) Outcomes and survival after laparoscopic gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma. Analysis on 65 patients operated on by conventional or robot-assisted minimal access procedures. EJSO. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2008 02.001

  18. Shirahishi N, Yasuda K, Kitano S (2006) Laparoscopic gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 9:167–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ziqiang W, Feng Q, Zhimin C et al (2006) Comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open radical distal gastrectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer management. Surg Endosc 20:1738–1743

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Pernazza G, Gentile E, Felicioni L et al (2006) Improved early survival after robotic gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 16:286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee YJ, Ha WS, Park ST et al (2007) Port-site recurrence after laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy: report of the first case. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 17:455–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Li C, Kim S, Lai JF et al (2008) Lymph node dissection around the splenic artery and hilum in advanced middle third gastric carcinoma. EJSO. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2008.03.011

  23. Douglass HO Jr, Hundahl SA, Macdonald JS et al (2007) Gastric cancer: D2 Dissection or Low Maruyama Index-Based Surgery—a Debate. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 16:133–135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kwon SJ, Members of the Korean Gastric Cancer Study Group (1997) Prognostic impact of splenectomy on gastric cancer: results of the Korean Gastric Cancer Study Group. World J Surg 21:837–844

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Maruyama K, Gunvén P, Okabayashi K et al (1989) Lymph node metastasis of gastric cancer. General pattern in 1, 931 patients. Ann Surg 210:596–602

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General Surgery and Videolaparoscopy, Niguarda Ca’ Granda Hospital, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore 3, 20162, Milan, Italy

    R. Pugliese, D. Maggioni, F. Sansonna, G. C. Ferrari, S. Di Lernia, C. Magistro, I. Pauna, A. Forgione, A. Costanzi & C. Brambilla

  2. Service of Gastroenterology and Digestive Surgery, Niguarda Ca’ Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy

    F. Pugliese

Authors
  1. R. Pugliese
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. Maggioni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. F. Sansonna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. G. C. Ferrari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. S. Di Lernia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. C. Magistro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. I. Pauna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. A. Forgione
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. A. Costanzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. C. Brambilla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. F. Pugliese
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Pugliese.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pugliese, R., Maggioni, D., Sansonna, F. et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic gastrectomy with D2 dissection for adenocarcinoma: initial experience with 17 patients. J Robotic Surg 2, 217–222 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-008-0116-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-008-0116-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation