Abstract
Separation of krypton/xenon is an important issue in some industrial applications. This study evaluates the performance of chabazite (CHA) zeolite membrane for krypton/xenon separation using molecular dynamics simulations. The permeation process was investigated at different temperatures (298, 323, 348, and 373 K) and applied pressures up to 25 MPa. The obtained results demonstrated high selectivity for Kr atoms; thus, only Kr atoms can permeate through the CHA membrane by applying external pressure. Permeation of Kr increased by increasing the temperature, but there was an optimum point for applied pressure. The best permeation (6.93 × 10−5 mol/(m2 s Pa)) was obtained at P = 3 MPa and T = 373 K. However, some simulations were performed at high temperature (700 K) and found higher permeation. The potential of mean force (PMF) of Kr and Xe atoms was also calculated to study the capability of CHA membrane for the separation of Kr/Xe gas mixtures. The results of PMF indicated that the driving force is needed for the permeation of Kr or Xe through the CHA membrane. Xenon atom could not easily pass through the membrane in comparison with Kr atom, which was also confirmed by simulation results.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson R, Schweitzer B, Wu T, Carreon MA, Gomez-Gualdron DA (2017) Molecular simulation insights on Xe/Kr separation in a set of nanoporous crystalline membranes. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10:582–592. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b14791
Auerbach SM, Carrado KA, Dutta PK (2003) Handbook of zeolite science and technology. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Azamat J, Khataee A (2018) Separation of CH4/C2H6 mixture using functionalized nanoporous silicon carbide nanosheet. Energy Fuels 32:7508–7518. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b01433
Bae Y-S, Hauser BG, Colón YJ, Hupp JT, Farha OK, Snurr RQ (2013) High xenon/krypton selectivity in a metal-organic framework with small pores and strong adsorption sites. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 169:176–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2012.11.013
Banerjee D et al (2015) Potential of metal-organic frameworks for separation of xenon and krypton. Acc Chem Res 48:211–219. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar5003126
Darden T, York D, Pedersen L (1993) Particle mesh ewald: an N·log(N) method for ewald sums in large systems. J Chem Phys 98:10089–10092. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.464397
Díaz-Cabañas M-J, Barrett PA (1998) Synthesis and structure of pure SiO2 chabazite: the SiO2 polymorph with the lowest framework density. Chem Commun. https://doi.org/10.1039/A804800B
Feng X, Zong Z, Elsaidi SK, Jasinski JB, Krishna R, Thallapally PK, Carreon MA (2016) Kr/Xe separation over a chabazite zeolite membrane. J Am Chem Soc 138:9791–9794. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b06515
Greathouse JA, Kinnibrugh TL, Allendorf MD (2009) Adsorption and separation of noble gases by IRMOF-1: grand canonical Monte Carlo simulations. Ind Eng Chem Res 48:3425–3431. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie801294n
Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K (1996) VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Gr 14:33–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5
Hye Kwon Y, Kiang C, Benjamin E, Crawford P, Nair S, Bhave R (2017) Krypton-xenon separation properties of SAPO-34 zeolite materials and membranes. AlChE J 63:761–769. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.15434
Jia W, Murad S (2004) Molecular dynamics simulations of gas separations using faujasite-type zeolite membranes. J Chem Phys 120:4877–4885. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1645771
Kerry FG (2007) Industrial gas handbook: gas separation and purification. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Lawler KV, Sharma A, Alagappan B, Forster PM (2016) Assessing zeolite frameworks for noble gas separations through a joint experimental and computational approach. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 222:104–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2015.10.005
Li S et al (2015) SAPO-34 Membranes for N2/CH4 separation: preparation, characterization, separation performance and economic evaluation. J Membr Sci 487:141–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.03.078
Liu D, Ma X, Xi H, Lin Y (2014) Gas transport properties and propylene/propane separation characteristics of ZIF-8 membranes. J Membr Sci 451:85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.09.029
Liu H, Chen Z, Dai S, Jiang D-E (2015) Selectivity trend of gas separation through nanoporous graphene. J Solid State Chem 224:2–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2014.01.030
MacKerell AD Jr et al (1998) All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J Phys Chem B 102:3586–3616. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp973084f
Olson DH, Camblor MA, Villaescusa LA, Kuehl GH (2004) Light hydrocarbon sorption properties of pure silica Si-CHA and ITQ-3 and high silica ZSM-58. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 67:27–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2003.09.025
Phillips JC et al (2005) Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J Comput Chem 26:1781–1802. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.20289
Roux B (1995) The calculation of the potential of mean force using computer simulations. Comput Phys Commun 91:275–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4655(95)00053-I
Ryan P, Farha OK, Broadbelt LJ, Snurr RQ (2011) Computational screening of metal-organic frameworks for xenon/krypton separation. AlChE J 57:1759–1766. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.12397
Sikora BJ, Wilmer CE, Greenfield ML, Snurr RQ (2012) Thermodynamic analysis of Xe/Kr selectivity in over 137 000 hypothetical metal–organic frameworks. Chem Sci 3:2217–2223. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2SC01097F
Sumer Z, Keskin S (2017) Molecular simulations of MOF adsorbents and membranes for noble gas separations. Chem Eng Sci 164:108–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2017.02.010
Sun Y, Han S (2015) Diffusion of N2, O2, H2S and SO2 in MFI and 4A zeolites by molecular dynamics simulations. Mol Simul 41:1095–1109. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927022.2014.945082
Torrie GM, Valleau JP (1977) Nonphysical sampling distributions in Monte Carlo free-energy estimation: umbrella sampling. J Comput Phys 23:187–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(77)90121-8
Venna SR, Carreon MA (2011) Amino-functionalized SAPO-34 membranes for CO2/CH4 and CO2/N2 separation. Langmuir 27:2888–2894. https://doi.org/10.1021/la105037n
Wang P, Li W, Du C, Zheng X, Sun X, Yan Y, Zhang J (2017) CO2/N2 separation via multilayer nanoslit graphene oxide membranes: molecular dynamics simulation study. Comput Mater Sci 140:284–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2017.09.010
Wu G, Robertson DH, Brooks CL, Vieth M (2003) Detailed analysis of grid-based molecular docking: a case study of CDOCKER—A CHARMm-based MD docking algorithm. J Comput Chem 24:1549–1562. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.10306
Yu M, Noble RD, Falconer JL (2011) Zeolite membranes: microstructure characterization and permeation mechanisms. Acc Chem Res 44:1196–1206. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar200083e
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by a research Grant of the University of Tabriz (Grant No. 791.970305).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hasanzadeh, A., Azamat, J., Pakdel, S. et al. Separation of noble gases using CHA-type zeolite membrane: insights from molecular dynamics simulation. Chem. Pap. 74, 3057–3065 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-020-01139-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-020-01139-9