Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Endoscopic Follow-Up Between 3 and 7 Years After Sleeve Gastrectomy Reveals Antral Reactive Gastropathy but no Barrett’s Esophagus

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The main concerns following sleeve gastrectomy (SG) include the risk of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and its complications, such as Barrett’s esophagus (BE). However, there is conflicting data on esophageal conditions, and studies on alterations of gastric mucosa after SG are lacking, despite reported cases of gastric cancer. Our aim was to assess esophageal and gastric lesions after SG.

Methods

From November 2017, an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) was proposed at least 3 years after SG to all patients operated on in our institution. Endoscopic results and gastric histological findings were analyzed. BE was defined as endoscopically suspected esophageal metaplasia with histological intestinal metaplasia.

Results

Between September 2008 and August 2018, 375 patients underwent SG at our institution, of which 162 (43%) underwent at least one UGE 3 years or more after SG (91% women, mean preoperative age: 43.3±10.3 years). Despite a significant increase in the prevalence of symptomatic GERD, hiatal hernia, and esophagitis after SG (p<0.001 vs. preoperatively), no cases of BE were detected. Gastric dysplasia was not found and the prevalence of gastric atrophy tended to decrease after SG. However, 27% of patients with gastric biopsies developed antral reactive gastropathy.

Conclusions

At a mean follow-up of 54 months after SG, no BE or gastric dysplasia was identified. However, reactive gastric lesions appeared, and their long-term consequences need to be further clarified. Thus, the timing of endoscopic follow-up, starting as early as 3 years after SG should be reevaluated to improve patient adherence with long-term endoscopies.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

References

  1. Carlsson LMS, Sjöholm K, Jacobson P, et al. Life Expectancy after Bariatric Surgery in the Swedish Obese Subjects Study. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(16):1535–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, et al. Bariatric Surgery Survey 2018: Similarities and Disparities Among the 5 IFSO Chapters. Obes Surg. 2021;31(5):1937–48.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Coupaye M, Rivière P, Breuil MC, et al. Comparison of nutritional status during the first year after sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2014;24(2):276–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Coupaye M, Gorbatchef C, Calabrese D, et al. Gastroesophageal Reflux After Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Prospective Mechanistic Study. Obes Surg. 2018;28(3):838–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Spechler SJ, Souza RF. Barrett's esophagus. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(9):836–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hvid-Jensen F, Pedersen L, Drewes AM, et al. Incidence of adenocarcinoma among patients with Barrett’s esophagus. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(15):1375–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sharma P. Barrett Esophagus: A Review. JAMA. 2022;328(7):663–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brown WA, Johari Halim Shah Y, Balalis G, et al. IFSO Position Statement on the Role of Esophago-Gastro-Duodenal Endoscopy Prior to and after Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery Procedures. Obes Surg. 2020;30(8):3135–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Campos GM, Mazzini GS, Altieri MS, et al. Clinical Issues Committee of the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. ASMBS position statement on the rationale for performance of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy before and after metabolic and bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2021;17(5):837–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fisher OM, Chan DL, Talbot ML, et al. Barrett's Oesophagus and Bariatric/Metabolic Surgery-IFSO 2020 Position Statement. Obes Surg. 2021;31(3):915–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ronkainen J, Aro P, Storskrubb T, et al. Prevalence of Barrett's esophagus in the general population: an endoscopic study. Gastroenterology. 2005;129(6):1825–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Genco A, Soricelli E, Casella G, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux disease and Barrett's esophagus after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a possible, underestimated long-term complication. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13(4):568–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sebastianelli L, Benois M, Vanbiervliet G, et al. Systematic Endoscopy 5 Years After Sleeve Gastrectomy Results in a High Rate of Barrett's Esophagus: Results of a Multicenter Study. Obes Surg. 2019;29(5):1462–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Braghetto I, Korn O. Late esophagogastric anatomic and functional changes after sleeve gastrectomy and its clinical consequences with regards to gastroesophageal reflux disease. Dis Esophagus. 2019;32(6):doz020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Benvenga R, Roussel J, Cohen R, et al. Long-term endoscopic follow-up after sleeve gastrectomy. J Visc Surg. 2020;S1878-7886(20):30278–2.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lallemand L, Duchalais E, Musquer N, et al. Does Sleeve Gastrectomy Increase the Risk of Barret's Esophagus? Obes Surg. 2021;31(1):101–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ferrer JV, Acosta A, García-Alementa EM, et al. High rate of de novo esophagitis 5 years after sleeve gastrectomy: a prospective multicenter study in Spain. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2022;18(4):546–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Felsenreich DM, Ladinig LM, Beckerhinn P, et al. Update: 10 Years of Sleeve Gastrectomy-the First 103 Patients. Obes Surg. 2018;28(11):3586–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Csendes A, Orellana O, Martínez G, et al. Clinical, Endoscopic, and Histologic Findings at the Distal Esophagus and Stomach Before and Late (10.5 Years) After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Results of a Prospective Study with 93% Follow-Up. Obes Surg. 2019;29(12):3809–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Genco A, Castagneto-Gissey L, Gualtieri L, et al. GORD and Barrett's oesophagus after bariatric procedures: multicentre prospective study. Br J Surg. 2021;108(12):1498–505.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Salminen P, Grönroos S, Helmiö M, et al. Effect of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy vs Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass on Weight Loss, Comorbidities, and Reflux at 10 Years in Adult Patients With Obesity: The SLEEVEPASS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg. 2022;157(8):656–66.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Felsenreich DM, Artemiou E, Wintersteller L, et al. Fifteen Years after Sleeve Gastrectomy: Gastroscopies, Manometries and 24h pH-metries in a Long-term Follow-up - A Multicenter Study. Obes Facts. 2022;15(5):666–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Coupaye M, Ribeiro-Parenti L, Baratte C, et al. No Long-Term Mucosal Lesions in the Esophagus but More Gastric Mucosal Lesions after Sleeve Gastrectomy in obese rats. J Clin Med. 2023;12(5):1848.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Ledoux S, Calabrese D, Bogard C, et al. Long-term Evolution of Nutritional Deficiencies After Gastric Bypass: An Assessment According to Compliance to Medical Care. Ann Surg. 2014;259(6):1104–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Haute autorité de santé [homepage on the Internet]. Obésité, prise en charge chirurgicale chez l’adulte. Janvier 2009: www.has-sante.fr. Accessed March, 20, 2023.

  26. Hill LD, Kozarek RA, Kraemer SJ, et al. The gastroesophageal flap valve: in vitro and in vivo observations. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;44(5):541–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Armstrong D, Bennett JR, Blum AL, et al. The endoscopic assessment of esophagitis: a progress report on observer agreement. Gastroenterology. 1996;111:85–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Levine DS, Haggitt RC, Blount PL, et al. An endoscopic biopsy protocol can differentiate high-grade dysplasia from early adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology. 1993;105(1):40–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Livzan MA, Mozgovoi SI, Gaus OV, et al. Diagnostic Principles for Chronic Gastritis Associated with Duodenogastric Reflux. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023;13(2):186.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Yu JX, Dolan RD, Bhalla S, et al. Quantification of gastric sleeve stenosis using endoscopic parameters and image analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2021;93(6):1344–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rebibo L, Hakim S, Dhahri A, et al. Gastric Stenosis After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Diagnosis and Management. Obes Surg. 2016;26(5):995–1001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Dixon MF, Genta RM, Yardley JH, et al. Classification and grading of gastritis. The updated Sydney System. International Workshop on the Histopathology of Gastritis, Houston 1994. Am J Surg Pathol. 1996;20:1161–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ferrer-Márquez M, Belda-Lozano R, Ferrer-Ayza M. Technical controversies in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2012;22(1):182–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Johari Y, Budiman K, Catchlove W, et al. Tubularized and Effaced Gastric Cardia Mimicking Barrett Esophagus Following Sleeve Gastrectomy: Protocolized Endoscopic and Histological Assessment With High-resolution Manometry Analysis. Ann Surg. 2022;276(1):119–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Gagner M, Deitel M, Erickson AL. Survey on laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) at the Fourth International Consensus Summit on Sleeve Gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2013;23(12):2013–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. D'Alessandro A, Dumont JL, Dagher I, et al. Endoscopy management of sleeve gastrectomy stenosis: what we learned from 202 consecutive patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2023;19(3):231–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Quinn CM, Bjarnason I, Price AB. Gastritis in patients on non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Histopathology. 1993;23(4):341–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Sobala GM, O'Connor HJ, Dewar EP, et al. Bile reflux and intestinal metaplasia in gastric mucosa. J Clin Pathol. 1993;46(3):235–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Kolli S, Mori A, Weissman S, et al. Etiological Analysis of Reactive Gastropathy in an Urban Population. Gastrointest Tumors. 2021;8(3):115–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Braghetto I, Gonzalez P, Lovera C, et al. Duodenogastric biliary reflux assessed by scintigraphic scan in patients with reflux symptoms after sleeve gastrectomy: preliminary results. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15(6):822–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhang LY, Zhang J, Li D, et al. Bile reflux is an independent risk factor for precancerous gastric lesions and gastric cancer: An observational cross-sectional study. J Dig Dis. 2021;22(5):282–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Shi X, Chen Z, Yang Y, et al. Bile Reflux Gastritis: Insights into Pathogenesis, Relevant Factors, Carcinomatous Risk, Diagnosis, and Management. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2022;2022:2642551.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muriel Coupaye.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics Approval

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Key points

• No Barrett’s esophagus was found in patients at a mean follow-up of 54 months after SG

• The prevalence of histological gastric atrophy tended to decrease 54 months after SG

• An antral reactive gastropathy appeared in 27% of patients 54 months after SG

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Coupaye, M., Gorbatchef, C., Dior, M. et al. Endoscopic Follow-Up Between 3 and 7 Years After Sleeve Gastrectomy Reveals Antral Reactive Gastropathy but no Barrett’s Esophagus. OBES SURG 33, 3112–3119 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-023-06785-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-023-06785-y

Keywords

Navigation