Skip to main content
Log in

Examining the Accessibility of Online Patient Materials for Bariatric Surgery

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Gero D, Hulesch B, Bueter M. Mindset and communication barriers in the diffusion of bariatric surgery. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2018;20(8):38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Paolino L, Genser L, Fritsch S, et al. The web-surfing bariatic patient: the role of the internet in the decision-making process. Obes Surg. 2015;25(4):738–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Thapa DK, Visentin DC, Kornhaber R, et al. The influence of online health information on health decisions: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2021;104(4):770–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Health literacy and patient safety: help patients understand. Manual for clinicians. 2nd ed. Accessed June 20, 2022. Available from: https://psnet.ahrq.gov/issue/health-literacy-and-patient-safety-help-patients-understand-manual-clinicians-2nd-ed.

  5. Home | mbsc coordinating center. MBSC Surgery. Accessed June 20, 2022. Available from: https://www.mbscsurgery.org.

  6. Ley P, Florio T. The use of readability formulas in health care. Psychol Health Med. 1996;1(1):7–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tait AR, Voepel-Lewis T, Malviya S, et al. Improving the readability and processability of a pediatric informed consent document: effects on parents’ understanding. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159(4):347–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pasithorn A. Suwanabol.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

Informed consent does not apply.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Key Points

• Patients use online resources to inform the decision to pursue bariatric surgery.

• Appropriate reading levels improve accessibility particularly for patients with low literacy.

• Bariatric surgery centers’ online patient materials are several grade levels above AMA recommendation.

• Multiple resources exist to improve readability and access for patients.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gutterman, S.A., Schroeder, J.N., Jacobson, C.E. et al. Examining the Accessibility of Online Patient Materials for Bariatric Surgery. OBES SURG 33, 975–977 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-022-06440-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-022-06440-y

Keyword

Navigation