Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of Self-Monitoring on Weight Loss After Bariatric Surgery

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Weight loss after bariatric surgery varies among patients. Patients who do not comply with self-monitoring are predicted to lose less weight than those who comply with self-monitoring.

Objective

To assess the effect of compliance with self-monitoring behavior on long-term %excess weight loss (%EWL) and %total weight loss (%TWL) among patients receiving laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB).

Methods

We used retrospective analysis to evaluate the self-monitoring behavior of patients and their weight changes throughout a 2-year follow-up. The participants were divided into two groups: group 1 consisted of participants who kept self-monitoring behavior records for all follow-ups and group 2 consisted of participants who kept self-monitoring behavior records for only six months of follow-up. Our investigators used telephone interviews to collect the data. By comparing %EWL and %TWL, we assessed the possible relationship between the long-term self-monitoring behavior, weight loss outcome, and operation type.

Results

There were 384 included samples. %EWL was significantly different between group 1 and group 2, and group 1 participants had better outcomes regardless of operational method. In group 2, LRYGB patients had better %EWL outcomes than LSG patients.

Conclusions

Patients with long-term self-monitoring behaviors have better %EWL and %TWL. Patients in LRYGB group had better weight loss outcomes than the LSG group.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nguyen NT, Varela JE. Bariatric surgery for obesity and metabolic disorders: state of the art. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;14(3):160–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gloy VL, Briel M, Bhatt DL, et al. Bariatric surgery versus non-surgical treatment for obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMJ. 2013;347:f5934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fiamoncini J, Fernandes Barbosa C, Arnoni Junior JR, et al. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery induces distinct but frequently transient effects on acylcarnitine, bile acid and phospholipid levels. Metabolites. 2018;8:83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Busetto L, Dicker A, Azran C, et al. Obesity management task force on the European association for the study of obesity. Released practical recommendations for the post-bariatric surgery medical management. Obes Surg. 2018;28:2117–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sperduto WA, Thompson HS, O'Brien RM. The effect of target behavior monitoring on weight loss and completion rate in a behavior modification program for weight reduction. Addict Behav. 1986;11:337–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Boutelle KN, Kirschenbaum DS. Further support for consistent self-monitoring as a vital component of successful weight control. Obes Res. 1998;6:219–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Carver CS, Scheier MF. On the structure of behavioral self-regulation. In: Boekaerts M, Pintrich PR, Zeidner M, editors. Handbook of self-regulation. San Diego: Academic; 2000. p. 42–75.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Amanda L, Carole B. Understanding dietary monitoring and self-weighing by gastric bypass patients: a pilot study of self-monitoring behaviors and long-term weight outcome. Obes Surg. 2012;22:1818–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Puzziferri N, Roshek TB, Mayo HG, et al. Long-term follow-up after bariatric surgery: a systematic review. JAMA. 2014;312(9):934–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tammaro P, Hansel B, Police A, et al. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: predictive factors for weight loss and band removal after more than 10 years' follow-up in a single university unit. World J Surg. 2017;41(8):2078–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sadhasivam S, Larson CJ, Lambert PJ, et al. Refusals, denials, and patient choice: reasons prospective patients do not undergo bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3:531–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wheeler E, Prettyman A, Lenhard MJ, et al. Adherence to outpatient program postoperative appointments after bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4:515–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Steinberg DM, Bennett GG, Askew S, et al. Weighing every day matters: daily weighing improves weight loss and adoption of weight control behaviors. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015;115(4):511–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Butryn ML, Phelan S, Hill JO, et al. Consistent self-monitoring of weight: a key component of successful weight loss maintenance. Obesity. 2007;15:3091–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gibson AA, Sainsbury A. Strategies to improve adherence to dietary weight loss interventions in research and real-world settings. Behav Sci. 2017;7:44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Flegal KM, Kruszon-Moran D, Carroll MD, et al. Trends in obesity among adults in the United States, 2005 to 2014. J Am Med Assoc. 2016;315(21):2284–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Peterson ND, Middleton KR, Nackers LM, et al. Dietary self-monitoring and long-term success with weight management. Obesity. 2014;22:1962–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Qiyan Z, Xiaohua Y. Overweight and obesity standards and subjective well-being: evidence from China. Econ Hum Biol. 2019;33:144–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, et al. Bariatric surgery Worldwide 2013. Obes Surg. 2015;25:1822–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Moroshko I, Brennan L, O'Brien P. Predictors of attrition in bariatric aftercare: a systematic review of the literature. Obes Surg. 2012;22:1640–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. McVay MA, Friedman KE, Applegate KL, et al. Patient predictors of follow-up care attendance in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9:956–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Khorgami Z, Zhang C, Messiah SE, et al. Predictors of postoperative aftercare attrition among gastric bypass patients. Bariatr Surg Pract Patient Care. 2015;10:79–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Júnior WS, do Amaral JL, Nonino-Borges CB. Factors related to weight loss up to 4 years after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2011;21:1724–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. van de Laar A, de Caluwé L. Dillemans B. Relative outcome measures for bariatric surgery. Evidence against excess weight loss and excess body mass index loss from a series of laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients. Obes Surg. 2011;21:763–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tolvanen L, Svensson Å, Hemmingsson E, et al. Perceived and preferred social support in patients experiencing weight regain after bariatric surgery—a qualitative study. Obes Surg. 2021;31(3):1256–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-05128-5.

  26. Lauren EB, Evan MF, Stephanie GK, et al. A pilot study of an acceptance-based behavioral intervention for weight regain after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2016;26:2433–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by Medical Science and Technology Research Fund of Guangdong Province, China. (B2019058).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Lina Wu or Wah Yang.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in the study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing of interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Key Points

1. Long-term self-monitoring behaviors enhance effect of weight loss after bariatric surgery.

2. The outcome of bariatric surgery is based on weight loss after bariatric surgery, but the outcome of weight loss is affected by different variables, that one is self-monitoring behaviors.

3. Patients in LRYGB group had better weight loss outcomes than the LSG group.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, X., Wu, L., Gao, L. et al. Impact of Self-Monitoring on Weight Loss After Bariatric Surgery. OBES SURG 31, 4399–4404 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05600-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05600-w

Keywords

Navigation