Skip to main content
Log in

Mechanisms of Esophageal and Gastric Transit Following Sleeve Gastrectomy

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) patients have substantially altered anatomy. The mechanism of rapid gastric emptying and the role of esophageal contractile function in esophago-gastric transit has not been defined. We aimed to determine the mechanisms of esophago-gastric transit and role of esophageal function following sleeve gastrectomy.

Methods

Prospective study of twenty-six asymptomatic participants post SG underwent nuclear scintigraphy and high-resolution manometry. Fourteen had semi-solid stress barium to model the emptying process. Concurrent video fluoroscopy and manometry were performed on 7 participants.

Results

Demographic data are as follows: age 45.3 ± 15.0 years, 73.1% female, excess weight loss 62.2 ± 28.1% at 8 months. Scintigraphy showed rapid gastric emptying (24.4 ± 11.4 vs. 75.80 ± 45.19 min in control, p < 0.001) with 35.24 ± 17.12% of bolus transited into small bowel on initial frame. Triggered deglutitive reflux was common (54.4% vs. 18.2%, p = 0.017). Stress barium delineated separate vertical and antral gastric compartments with cyclical emptying of 8 stages, including reflux-induced repeated esophageal peristalsis. During manometry, ramping effects were noted, with sequential swallows producing sustained isobaric pressurizations in proximal stomach (33.6 ± 29.5 mmHg). Video fluoroscopy showed individual esophageal peristalsis generating pressurizations at 5.0 ± 1.4 cm below lower esophageal sphincter (LES), at amplitude of 31.6 ± 13.1 mmHg, associated with intragastric transit. Pressurizations were sustained for 17.3 ± 8.2 s, similar to the prolonged LES contraction (18.5 ± 9.0 s, p = 0.355).

Conclusions

Repeated esophageal peristaltic contractions induced isobaric pressurization of proximal stomach, thus providing the drive to pressurize and empty the vertical compartment of the gastric sleeve. Transit following SG appeared to be esophageal-mediated and followed a distinct cycle with strong associations with reflux.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arman GA, Himpens J, Dhaenens J, et al. Long-term (11+years) outcomes in weight, patient satisfaction, comorbidities, and gastroesophageal reflux treatment after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(10):1778–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Vigneshwaran B, Wahal A, Aggarwal S, et al. Impact of sleeve gastrectomy on type 2 diabetes mellitus, gastric emptying time, glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), ghrelin and leptin in non-morbidly obese subjects with BMI 30-35.0 kg/m(2): a prospective study. Obes Surg. 2016;26(12):2817–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Tolone S, Savarino E, Yates RB. The impact of bariatric surgery on esophageal function. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2016;1381(1):98–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bou Daher H, Sharara AI. Gastroesophageal reflux disease, obesity and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: the burning questions. World J Gastroenterol. 2019;25(33):4805–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nocca D, Loureiro M, Skalli EM, et al. Five-year results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for the treatment of severe obesity. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(8):3251–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Barr AC, Frelich MJ, Bosler ME, et al. GERD and acid reduction medication use following gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(1):410–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Locke III GR, Talley NJ, Fett SL, et al. Risk factors associated with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux. Am J Med. 1999;106:642–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ruhl CE, Everhart JE. Overweight, but not high dietary fat intake, increases risk of gastroesophageal reflux disease hospitalization—the NHANES I Epidemiologic Followup Study. Ann Epidemiol. 1999;9:424–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Iossa A, Abdelgawad M, Watkins BM, et al. Leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: overview of pathogenesis and risk factors. Langenbeck's Arch Surg. 2016;401(6):757–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Parikh M, Issa R, McCrillis A, et al. Surgical strategies that may decrease leak after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 9991 cases. Ann Surg. 2013;257(2):231–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Stroh C, Kockerling F, Volker L, et al. Results of more than 11,800 sleeve gastrectomies: data analysis of the German Bariatric Surgery Registry. Ann Surg. 2016;263(5):949–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cesana G, Cioffi S, Giorgi R, et al. Proximal leakage after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: an analysis of preoperative and operative predictors on 1738 consecutive procedures. Obes Surg. 2018;28(3):627–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yuval JB, Mintz Y, Cohen MJ, et al. The effects of bougie caliber on leaks and excess weight loss following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Is there an ideal bougie size? Obes Surg. 2013;23(10):1685–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Burgos AM, Braghetto I, Csendes A, et al. Gastric leak after laparoscopic-sleeve gastrectomy for obesity. Obes Surg. 2009;19(12):1672–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Al Hajj G, Chemaly R. Fistula following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a proposed classification and algorithm for optimal management. Obes Surg. 2018;28(3):656–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mion F, Tolone S, Garros A, et al. High-resolution impedance manometry after sleeve gastrectomy: increased intragastric pressure and reflux are frequent events. Obes Surg. 2016;26(10):2449–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Corcelles R, Boules M, Froylich D, et al. Total weight loss as the outcome measure of choice after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2016;26(8):1794–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Burton PR, Yap K, Brown WA, et al. Changes in satiety, supra- and infraband transit, and gastric emptying following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: a prospective follow-up study. Obes Surg. 2011;21(2):217–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Johari Y, Ooi G, Burton P, et al. Long-term matched comparison of adjustable gastric banding versus sleeve gastrectomy: weight loss, quality of life, hospital resource use and patient-reported outcome measures. Obes Surg. 2020;30(1):214–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dakkak M, Bennett JR. A new dysphagia score with objective validation. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1992;14(2):354–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Anvari M, Allen C, Born A. Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication is a satisfactory alternative to long-term omeprazole therapy. Br J Surg. 1995;82(7):938–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. McHorney CA, Ware Jr JE, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care. 1993;31:247–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Burton PR, Brown WA, Laurie C, et al. Mechanisms of bolus clearance in patients with laparoscopic adjustable gastric bands. Obes Surg. 2010;20(9):1265–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Burton PR, Brown WA, Laurie C, et al. The effect of laparoscopic adjustable gastric bands on esophageal motility and the gastroesophageal junction; analysis using high resolution video manometry. Obes Surg. 2009;19(7):905–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kahrilas PJ, Ghosh SK, Pandolfino JE. Esophageal motility disorders in terms of pressure topography: the Chicago Classification. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008;42:627–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ryan KK, Tremaroli V, Clemmensen C, et al. FXR is a molecular target for the effects of vertical sleeve gastrectomy. Nature. 2014;509(7499):183–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Yazmin Johari was extensively involved in design, data collection, data analysis, presentation, and write up.

Anagi Wickremasinghe, Pradipta Kiswadono, Helen Yue, Geraldine Ooi, and Cheryl Laurie were involved in the initial design, patient recruitment, data collection, and data representation.

Geoffrey Hebbard, Paul Beech, Kenneth SK Yap, Wendy Brown, and Paul Burton were extensively involved in initial concept, design, supervision, data analysis, presentation, write up, and final approval of the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yazmin Johari.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Wendy Brown received grants from Johnson and Johnson, grants from Medtronic, grants from GORE, personal fees from GORE, grants from Applied Medical, grants from Apollo Endosurgery, grants and personal fees from Novo Nordisc, and personal fees from Merck Sharpe and Dohme, outside the submitted work. The other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

Ethics approval was obtained from the Alfred Hospital Human Research and Ethics Committee (HREC) no. 380/16 and The Avenue Hospital HREC no. 236.

Informed Consent

An information statement was provided prior to commencement. Written informed consent was obtained in an opt-in manner.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Johari, Y., Wickremasinghe, A., Kiswandono, P. et al. Mechanisms of Esophageal and Gastric Transit Following Sleeve Gastrectomy. OBES SURG 31, 725–737 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04988-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04988-1

Keywords

Navigation