Skip to main content
Log in

Attention to Technical Details Is Important for Best Outcomes with One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abbreviations

OAGB:

one anastomosis gastric bypass

OGD:

oesophago-gastro-duodenoscopy

References

  1. Shenouda MM, Harb SE, Mikhail SAA, et al. Bile gastritis following laparoscopic single anastomosis gastric bypass: pilot study to assess significance of bilirubin level in gastric aspirate. Obes Surg. 2018;28(2):389–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mahawar KK, Carr WR, Balupuri S, et al. Controversy surrounding ‘mini’ gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2014;24(2):324–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mahawar KK, Jennings N, Brown J, et al. “Mini” gastric bypass: systematic review of a controversial procedure. Obes Surg. 2013;23(11):1890–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. El-Masry S, El-Shahat M, Badra G, et al. Helicobacter pylori and hepatitis C virus coinfection in Egyptian patients. J Global Infect Dis. 2010;2(1):4–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mohammad MA, Hussein L, Coward A, et al. Prevalence of helicobacter pylori infection among Egyptian children: impact of social background and effect on growth. Public Health Nutr. 2008;11(3):230–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Eshraghian A. Epidemiology of helicobacter pylori infection among the healthy population in Iran and countries of the eastern Mediterranean region: a systematic review of prevalence and risk factors. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(46):17618–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Vere CC, Cazacu S, Comănescu V, et al. Endoscopical and histological features in bile reflux gastritis. Romanian J Morphol Embryol. 2005;46(4):269–74.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mahawar KK. Key features of an ideal one anastomosis/mini-gastric bypass pouch. Obes Surg. 2017;27(6):1630–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Doulami G, Triantafyllou S, Albanopoulos K, et al. Acid and nonacid gastroesophageal reflux after single anastomosis gastric bypass. An objective assessment using 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH metry. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(4):484–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. De Luca M, Tie T, Ooi G, et al. Mini gastric bypass-one anastomosis gastric bypass (MGB-OAGB)-IFSO position statement. Obes Surg. 2018;28:1188–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3182-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mahawar KK, Himpens J, Shikora SA, et al. The first consensus statement on one anastomosis/mini gastric bypass (OAGB/MGB) using a modified Delphi approach. Obes Surg. 2018;28(2):303–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kamal K. Mahawar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.

Statement on Human and Animal Rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

Not applicable.

Ethical Approval

Not applicable.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mahawar, K.K. Attention to Technical Details Is Important for Best Outcomes with One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass. OBES SURG 28, 2920–2921 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3367-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3367-9

Navigation