Skip to main content
Log in

Association Between the Publication of Clinical Evidence and the Use of Bariatric Surgery

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to assess whether publication of clinical evidence was associated with increased utilization of bariatric surgery.

Methods

We systematically searched the literature (1994 to 2008) to identify studies on bariatric surgery. We sorted the evidence by publication date and citation frequency. We linked the published evidence to data from the Kaiser Permanente Washington (KPWA) on 1421 bariatric surgery cases and 45,665 medically managed patients with severe obesity to assess the association between evidence and use of bariatric surgery. We used an interrupted time series analysis with a control group to estimate the association. In secondary analyses, we examined the association with accumulating major clinical evidence, the type of evidence, and stratification by influential tiers.

Results

A total of 9913 papers were identified and the top 100 cited papers were initially selected. After inclusion criteria were applied, 35 papers were selected. We selected the fourth quarter in 2004 as the exposure based on publication for the two studies with the largest number of citations. Compared to the projected secular trend, the publication of those two major articles was associated with 50 additional cases of bariatric surgery performed per 100,000 eligible individuals per quarter. In our secondary analyses, higher quality evidence (e.g., RCTs) and more highly cited evidence were each associated with a greater probability of receiving bariatric surgery.

Conclusions

For patient members of the KPWA with severe obesity, publication of clinical evidence was associated with increased use of bariatric surgery. This finding suggests that publication of higher quality positive clinical evidence may influence utilization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eddy DM. Designing a practice policy: standards, guidelines, and options. JAMA. 1990;263(22):3077–84. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1990.03440220105041.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Timmermans S, Mauck A. The promises and pitfalls of evidence-based medicine. Health Aff. 2005;24(1):18–28. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.24.1.18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lamas GA, Pfeffer MA, Hamm P, et al. Do the results of randomized clinical trials of cardiovascular drugs influence medical practice? The SAVE Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1992;327(4):241–7. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199207233270405.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gross CP, Steiner CA, Bass EB, et al. Relation between prepublication release of clinical trial results and the practice of carotid endarterectomy. JAMA. 2000;284(22):2886–93. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.284.22.2886.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Majumdar SR, McAlister FA, Soumerai SB. Synergy between publication and promotion: comparing adoption of new evidence in Canada and the United States. Am J Med. 2003;115(6):467–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9343(03)00422-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Picot J, Jones J, Colquitt JL, et al. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of bariatric (weight loss) surgery for obesity: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2009;13(41):1–190–215–357–iii–iv. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta13410.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. O'Brien PE, McPhail T, Chaston TB, et al. Systematic review of medium-term weight loss after bariatric operations. Obes Surg. 2006;16(8):1032–40. https://doi.org/10.1381/096089206778026316.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;292(14):1724–37. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.292.14.1724.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gloy VL, Briel M, Bhatt DL, et al. Bariatric surgery versus non-surgical treatment for obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2013;347(oct22 1):f5934. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f5934.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Sjostrom L, Narbro K, Sjostrom CD, et al. Effects of bariatric surgery on mortality in Swedish obese subjects. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(8):741–52. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa066254.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pontiroli AE, Morabito A. Long-term prevention of mortality in morbid obesity through bariatric surgery. A systematic review and meta-analysis of trials performed with gastric banding and gastric bypass. Ann Surg. 2011;253(3):484–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31820d98cb.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Adams TD, Gress RE, Smith SC, et al. Long-term mortality after gastric bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(8):753–61. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa066603.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sjostrom L, Lindroos AK, Peltonen M, et al. Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(26):2683–93. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa035622.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dixon JB, le Roux CW, Rubino F, Zimmet P. Bariatric surgery for type 2 diabetes. Lancet 2012;379(9833):2300–2311. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60401-2.

  15. Schauer PR, Kashyap SR, Wolski K, et al. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy in obese patients with diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(17):1567–76. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1200225.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Buchwald H, Estok R, Fahrbach K, et al. Weight and type 2 diabetes after bariatric surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Med. 2009;122(3):248–256e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.09.041.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Livingston EH, Fink AS. Quality of life: cost and future of bariatric surgery. Arch Surg. 2003;138(4):383–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.138.4.383.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Herpertz S, Kielmann R, Wolf AM, et al. Does obesity surgery improve psychosocial functioning? A systematic review. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2003;27(11):1300–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0802410.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Schauer PR, Bhatt DL, Kashyap SR. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(7):682. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc1407393.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Maggard MA, Shugarman LR, Suttorp M. Meta-analysis: surgical treatment of obesity. Ann Int Med. 2005;142(7):547–59. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-142-7-200504050-00013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mingrone G, Panunzi S, De Gaetano A, et al. Bariatric surgery versus conventional medical therapy for type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2012;366(17):1577–1585. doi:https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1200111.

  22. Martin M, Beekley A, Kjorstad R, et al. Socioeconomic disparities in eligibility and access to bariatric surgery: a national population-based analysis. SOARD. 2013;6(1):8–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2009.07.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nguyen NT, Masoomi H, Magno CP, et al. Trends in use of bariatric surgery, 2003-2008. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;213(2):261–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.04.030.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. NIH Consensus Statement. Gastrointestinal Surgery for Severe Obesity. Vol 9. 1991:1–20. https://consensus.nih.gov/1991/1991gisurgeryobesity084html.htm.

  25. Arterburn DE, Bogart A, Sherwood NE, et al. A multisite study of long-term remission and relapse of type 2 diabetes mellitus following gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2013;23(1):93–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-012-0802-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Maciejewski ML, Livingston EH, Smith VA, et al. Survival among high-risk patients after bariatric surgery. JAMA. 2011;305(23):2419–26. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.817.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sjöström L, Lindroos A-K, Peltonen M, et al. Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(26):2683–93. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa035622.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Reames BN, Finks JF, Bacal D, et al. Changes in bariatric surgery procedure use in Michigan, 2006-2013. JAMA. 2014;312(9):959–61. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.7651.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Guyatt GH, Haynes RB, Jaeschke RZ, et al. Users’ guides to the medical literature—XXV. Evidence-based medicine: principles for applying the users’ guides to patient care. JAMA. 2000;284(10):1290–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, et al. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999-2008. JAMA. 2010;303(3):235–41. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.2014.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Flegal KM, Kruszon-Moran D, Carroll MD, et al. Trends in obesity among adults in the United States, 2005 to 2014. JAMA. 2016;315(21):2284–91. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.6458.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Arterburn DE, Courcoulas AP. Bariatric surgery for obesity and metabolic conditions in adults. BMJ. 2014;349(aug27 9):g3961. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g3961.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. The Centers for Medicare Medicaid Services. National Coverage Determination (NCD) for Bariatric Surgery for Treatment of Morbid Obesity. https://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/details/ncd-details.aspx?NCDId=57&bc=AgAAgAAAAAAA&ncdver=3. Accessed December 24, 2016.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David D. Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Informed Consent

Not applicable.

Ethical Approval

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Electronic Supplementary Material

ESM 1

(DOCX 115 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, D.D., Arterburn, D.E., Sullivan, S.D. et al. Association Between the Publication of Clinical Evidence and the Use of Bariatric Surgery. OBES SURG 28, 1321–1328 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-017-2990-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-017-2990-1

Keywords

Navigation