Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Post-implant Analysis of Epidemiologic and Eating Behavior Data Related to Weight Loss Effectiveness in Obese Patients Treated with Gastric Electrical Stimulation

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To determine possible preoperative predictors for obtaining clinically meaningful weight loss with gastric electrical stimulation (GES) using the “Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire” (TFEQ) as well as epidemiological data.

Methods

Ninety-seven obese participants in a prospective multicenter randomized study conducted in nine European centers were implanted laparoscopically with the abiliti® closed-loop GES system (CLGES). Five clinical variables and three preoperative TFEQ factor scores (F1—cognitive-restraint, F2—disinhibition, and F3—hunger) were analyzed in order to determine predictors of weight loss success defined as excess weight loss (EWL) > 30% and failure defined as EWL < 20% at 12 months post-surgery.

Results

The mean 12-month %EWL with CLGES was 35.1 ± 19.7%, with a success rate of 52% and a failure rate of 19%. Significant predictors of success were body mass index (BMI) < 40 kg/m2 and age ≥ 50 years, increasing probability of success by 22 and 29%, respectively. A low F1—cognitive-restraint score was a significant predictor of failure (p = 0.004). The best predictive model for success included F1—cognitive-restraint, F2—disinhibition, BMI < 40, and age ≥ 50 (p = 0.002).

Conclusion

This retrospective analysis has shown that age, preoperative BMI, and F1—cognitive-restraint and F2—disinhibition scores from a preoperatively administered TFEQ are predictive of weight loss outcomes with CLGES and may be used for patient selection.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01448785.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cigaina VV, Saggioro A, Rigo VV, et al. Long-term effects of gastric pacing to reduce feed intake in swine. Obes Surg. 1996;6:250–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Policker S, Haddad W, Yaniv I. Treatment of type 2 diabetes using meal-triggered gastric electrical stimulation. Isr Med Assoc J. 2009;11(4):206–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shikora SA, Bergenstal R, Bessler M, et al. Implantable gastric stimulation for the treatment of clinically severe obesity: results of the SHAPE trial. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5:31–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ikramuddin S, Blackstone RP, Brancatisano A, et al. Effect of reversible intermittent intra-abdominal vagal nerve blockade on morbid obesity: the ReCharge randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014;312:915–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shikora SA, Wolfe BM, Apovian CM, et al. Sustained weight loss with vagal nerve blockade but not with sham: 18-month results of the ReCharge trial. J Obes. 2015;365604 doi:10.1155/2015/365604.

  6. Miras M, Serrano M, Durán C, et al. Early experience with customized, meal-triggered gastric electrical stimulation in obese patients. Obesity Surg. 2015;25:174–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Horbach T, Thalheimer A, Seyfried F, et al. abiliti® closed loop gastric electrical stimulation system for treatment of obesity: clinical results with a 27-month follow-up. Obesity Surg. 2015;25:1779–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Horbach T, Meyer G, Morales-Conde S, et al. Closed-loop gastric electrical stimulation versus laparoscopic adjustable gastric band for the treatment of obesity: a randomized 12-month multicenter study. Int J Obes. 2016; doi:10.1038/ijo.2016.159.

    Google Scholar 

  9. National Institutes of Health. Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults—the evidence report. Obes Res. 1998;6(Suppl 2):51S–209S.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dunkle-Blatter SE, St Jean MR, Whitehead C, et al. Outcomes among elderly bariatric patients at a high-volume center. Dis Relat ObesSurg. 2007;3:163–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hays NP, Bathalon GP, McCrory MA, et al. Eating behavior correlates of adult weight gain and obesity in healthy women aged 55-65 y. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002;75(3):476–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kruger R, De Bray JG, Beck KL, Conlon CA, Stonehouse W. Exploring the relationship between body composition and eating behavior using the Three Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ) in young New Zealand women. Nutrients. 2016; 8(7): doi:10.3390/nu8070386.

  13. Campos GM, Rabl C, Mulligan K, et al. Factors associated with weight loss after gastric bypass. Arch Surg. 2008;143:877–83. discussion 884

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Livingston EH, Huerta S, Arthur D, et al. Male gender is a predictor of morbidity and age a predictor of mortality for patients undergoing gastric bypass surgery. Ann Surg. 2002;236:576–82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Stunkard AJ, Messick S. The three-factor eating questionnaire (TFEQ) eating or inventory. In: Rush J, First MB, Blacker D, editors. Handbook of psychiatric measures. 2nd ed. USA: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2008. p. 631–3.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Stunkard AJ, Messick S. The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger. J Psychosom Res. 1985;29:71–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Miras AD, Al-Najim W, Jackson SN, et al. Psychological characteristics, eating behavior, and quality of life assessment of obese patients undergoing weight loss interventions. Scand J Surg. 2015 Mar;104(1):10–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Burgmer R, Grigutsch K, Zipfel S, et al. The influence of eating behavior and eating pathology on weight loss after gastric restriction operations. Obes Surg. 2005 May;15(5):684–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Langlois F, Langlois MF, Carpentier AC, et al. Ghrelin levels are associated with hunger as measured by the three-factor eating questionnaire in healthy young adults. Physiol Behav. 2011 Sep 1;104(3):373–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bas M, Bozan N, Cigerim N. Dieting, dietary restraint, and binge eating disorder among overweight adolescents in Turkey. Adolescence. 2008;43(171):635–49.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Le Grange D, Gorin A, Catley D, et al. Does momentary assessment detect binge eating in overweight women that is denied at interview? Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2001;9:309–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bryant EJ, King NA, Blundell JE. Disinhibition: its effects on appetite and weight regulation. Obes Rev. 2008;9(5):409–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. WHO consultation on obesity. Obesity: prevention and management the global epidemic. Geneva. World Health Organization, June 3–5, 1997. (WHO technical report series no 894).

  24. Trieu HT, Gonzalvo JP, Szomstein S, et al. Safety and outcomes of laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery in patients 60 years of age and older. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3:383–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Scozzari G, Passera R, Benvenga R, et al. Age as a long-term prognostic factor bariatric surgery. Ann Surg. 2012;256(5):724–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Nguyen NT, Rivers R, Wolfe BM. Factors associated with operative outcomes in laparoscopic gastric bypass. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;197:548–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Varela JE, Wilson SE, Nguyen NT. Outcomes of bariatric surgery in the elderly. Surg Am. 2006;72:865–9.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Contreras JE, Santander C, Court I, et al. Correlation between age and weight loss after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2013;23(8):1286–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gokee-LaRose J, Gorin AA, Raynor HA, et al. Are standard behavioral weight loss programs effective for young adults? Int J Obes. 2009 Dec;33(12):1374–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Puzziferri N, Nakonezny PA, Livingston EH, et al. Variations of weight loss and gastric bypass following gastric band. Ann Surg. 2008;248:233–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Keren D, Matter I, Lavy A. Lifestyle modification parallels to sleeve success. Obes Surg. 2014;24(5):735–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the following investigators and site personnel who participated in the study: principal investigator: Thomas Horbach, MD, Stadtkrankenhaus Schwabach, Schwabach, Germany. Co-investigators: Spain: Salvador Morales Conde, MD and Isaías Alarcón del Agua, MD, Hospital Virgen del Rocio, Sevilla; Antonio José Torres, MD, Andrés Sanchez Pernaute, MD, and Miguel A. Rubio, MD, Complutense University of Madrid Hospital Clinico “San Carlos”, Madrid; Antonio José Torres, Fernando Lapuente, Felipe Acedo, and Antonio Picardo, Hospital Universitario Madrid Monteprincipe, Madrid. Germany: Günther Meyer, MD, Wolfart Klinik Adipositas Zentrum, München-Graefelfing; Christine Stroh, MD, SRH Wald-Klinikum Gera, Gera; Martin Susewind, MD, C Ev. Krankenhaus Hubertus, Berlin. France: Jerome Dargent, MD, Polyclinique de Rillieux, Clinique Lyon-Nord, RILLIEUX. Italy: Franco Favretti, MD, Vicenza Regional Hospital, Vicenza; Giuseppe M. Rovera, MD, San Luca Torino, Torino and Marco Anselmino, MD, University Hospital Pisa, Pisa.

The study was financially supported by the IntraPace Inc., San Jose, CA, USA. We would also like to thank sponsor personnel Rose Province for contribution to content and language editing, and Javier Sanchez for the support with data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. Alarcón del Agua.

Ethics declarations

This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Conflict of Interest

Dr. Alarcón del Agua, Dr. Socas-Macias, Dr. Moreno-Barranco, Dr. García de Luna, and Dr. Morales-Conde have nothing to disclose. Dr. Torres-Garcia and Dr. Busetto report personal fees from IntraPace Inc., during the conduct of the study. Dr. Busetto also reports personal fees from Novo Nordisk, outside the submitted work.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alarcón del Agua, I., Socas-Macias, M., Busetto, L. et al. Post-implant Analysis of Epidemiologic and Eating Behavior Data Related to Weight Loss Effectiveness in Obese Patients Treated with Gastric Electrical Stimulation. OBES SURG 27, 1573–1580 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2495-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2495-3

Keywords

Navigation