Skip to main content
Log in

Publication Trends in Bariatric Surgery: a Bibliometric Study

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The interest in bariatric surgery has considerably increased in the scientific community in the last two decades. We present a bibliometric analysis of scientific publications in bariatric surgery focusing on the period 2010–2014.

Methods

We used the Web of Science database as source of data. The main bibliometric indicators were applied in order to assess the increase of scientific production, the productivity of journals, authors, and countries.

Results

Bibliographic research retrieved 7860 papers for the period 2010–2014.

The scientific production in bariatric surgery has an exponential distribution (r = 97.9 %). A total of 76.8 % (21,893/28,505) of authors signed one paper and 307 (1.1 %) signed ten or more. The two most prolific journals are Obesity Surgery and SOARD, responsible for 22 % of the publication. The largest contributors in absolute number of articles are the USA, the UK, and Italy, while Sweden, Norway, and Switzerland are the most prolific nations after adjustment for the number of inhabitants and prevalence of obesity.

Conclusion

Bariatric surgery has been a field of intense research in the last 20 years.

We observed a growing interest of non-surgical journals and an increasing participation of new countries. Nevertheless, latest trends suggest a saturation of scientific production in this field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Buchwald H, Oien DM. Metabolic/bariatric surgery worldwide 2011. Obes Surg. 2013;23:427–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Burns EM, Naseem H, Bottle A, et al. Introduction of laparoscopic bariatric surgery in England: observational population cohort study. BMJ. 2010;341:c4296.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stroh C, Birk D, Flade-Kuthe R, et al. A nationwide survey on bariatric surgery in Germany—results 2005–2007. Obes Surg. 2009;19:105–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Marsk R, Freedman J, Tynelius P, et al. Antiobesity surgery in Sweden from 1980 to 2005: a population-based study with a focus on mortality. Ann Surg. 2008;248:777–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lazzati A, Guy-Lachuer R, Delaunay V, et al. Bariatric surgery trends in France: 2005–2011. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10(2):328–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nguyen NT, Masoomi H, Magno CP, et al. Trends in une of bariatric surgery: 2003-2008. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;213(2):261–6.

  7. Lomanto D, Lee WJ, Goel R, et al. Bariatric surgery in Asia in the 598 last 5 years (2005–2009). Obes Surg. 2012;22:502–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Vioque J, Ramos JM, Navarrete-Muñoz EM, et al. A bibliometric study of scientific literature on obesity research in PubMed (1988–2007). Obes Rev. 2010;11(8):603–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pritchard A. ‘Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics?’. J Doc. 1969;25(4):348–9. Available from: https://www.academia.edu/598618/Statistical_bibliography_or_bibliometrics.

    Google Scholar 

  10. The World Bank. Indicators [Internet]. Available from: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator

  11. World Health Organization. Global database on body mass index [Internet]. Available from: http://apps.who.int/bmi/index.jsp

  12. EF English Proficiency Index. Methodology [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ef.co.uk/epi

  13. Wikipedia.com. EF English Proficiency Index [Internet]. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EF_English_Proficiency_Index

  14. Price DJS. Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press; 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Price DJS. Science since Babylon. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1962. p. 119.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lotka AJ. The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. J Wash Acad Sci. 1926;16(12):317–32.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Price DJS. Quantitative measures of development of science. Arc Int Hist Sci (Paris). 1951;4(14):85–93.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Radhakrishnan T, Kernizan R. Lotka’s law and computer science literature. J Am Soc Inf Sci. 1979;30(1):51–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Voos H. Lotka and information science. J Am Soc Inf Sci. 1974;25:270–2. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.4630250410/abstract.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Price DJS. Science et Suprascience. Paris, Fayard: Traduction française de G. Lévy; 1972. p. 70.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rostaing H. Veille technologique et bibliométrie : concepts, outils, applications [Internet]. Available from: http://quoniam.info/competitive-intelligence/PDF/PhDs_Guidance/PhD_Herve_Rostaing.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Lazzati.

Ethics declarations

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed Consent

Does not apply.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dabi, Y., Darrigues, L., Katsahian, S. et al. Publication Trends in Bariatric Surgery: a Bibliometric Study. OBES SURG 26, 2691–2699 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2160-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2160-x

Keywords

Navigation