Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Patient and Parent Perspectives of Adolescent Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding (LAGB)

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Adolescent obesity is a significant global health challenge and severely obese adolescents commonly experience serious medical and psychosocial challenges. Consequently, severe adolescent obesity is increasingly being treated surgically. The limited available research examining the effectiveness of adolescent bariatric surgery focuses primarily on bio-medical outcomes. There is a need for a more comprehensive understanding of the behavioural, emotional and social factors which affect adolescents’ and parents’ experience of weight loss surgery.

Methods

Patient and parents’ perspectives of adolescent LAGB were examined using a qualitative research methodology. Individual, semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight adolescent patients and five parents. Thematic analysis was used to identify key themes in the qualitative data.

Results

Patients and parents generally considered adolescent laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) to be a life-changing experience, resulting in physical and mental health benefits. Factors considered to facilitate weight loss following surgery included parental support and adherence to treatment guidelines. Many adolescents reported experiencing surgical weight loss stigma and challenging interpersonal outcomes after weight loss for which they felt unprepared.

Conclusions

Patients and parents perceived LAGB positively. There are opportunities to improve both the experience and outcomes of adolescent LAGB through parental education and enhancements to surgical aftercare programmes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Huang R, Beilin L. Adolescent BMI is independently associated with the development of coronary hearth disease. Evid Based Med. 2012;17(1):35–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schwimmer JB, Burwinkle TM, Varni JW. Health-related quality of life of severely obese children and adolescents. J Am Med Assoc. 2003;289(14):1813–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zeller MH et al. Psychosocial functioning improves following adolescent bariatric surgery. Obesity. 2009;17(5):985–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Neumark-Sztainer D et al. Weight-teasing among adolescents: correlations with weight status and disordered eating behaviors. Int J Obes (Lond). 2002;26:123–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Britz B et al. Rates of psychiatric disorders in a clinical study group of adolescents with extreme obesity and in obese adolescents ascertained via a population based study. Int J Obes (Lond). 2000;24:1707–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Puhl, R.M., C.A. Heuer, and K.D. Brownell, Stigma and social consequences of obesity, in Clinical obesity in adults and children, P.G. Kopelman, I.D. Caterson, and W.H. Dietz, Editors. 2010, Blackwell

  7. Murtagh J, Dixey R, Rudolf M. A qualitative investigation into the levers and barriers to weight loss in children: opinions of obese children. Arch Dis Child. 2006;91(11):920–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Stewart L et al. Parents’ journey through treatment for their child’s obesity: a qualitative study. Arch Dis Child. 2008;93:35–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Oude Luttikhuis H et al. Interventions for treating obesity in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;1.

  10. Tsai WS, Inge TH, Burd RS. Bariatric surgery in adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161:217–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. O’Brien P et al. Long-term outcomes after bariatric surgery. Ann Surg. 2013;257(1):87–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Aikenhead A, C Knai, and T. Lobstein, Do surgical interventions to treat obesity in children and adolescents have long- versus short-term advantages and are they cost-effective? 2012, World Health Organization.

  13. Pallati P et al. Trends in adolescent bariatric surgery evaluated by UHC database collection. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(11):3077–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Black, J.A., et al. Bariatric surgery for obese children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obesity Reviews, 2013.

  15. Treadwell JR, Sun F, Schoelles K. Systematic review and meta-analysis of bariatric surgery for pediatric obesity. Ann Surg. 2008;248(5):763–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Willcox K and L Brennan. Biopsychosocial outcomes of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in adolescents: a systematic review of the literature. Obesity Surgery, 2014: p. 1-10.

  17. O’Brien PE et al. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in severely obese adolescents: a randomized trial. J Am Med Assoc. 2010;303(6):519–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Vazzana AD. Psychological outcomes of bariatric surgery in morbidly obese adolescents. Prim Psychiatry. 2008;15(8):68–73.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Borrell-Carrio F, Suchman AL, Epstein RM. The biopsychosocial model 25 years later: principles, practice and scientific enquiry. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2(6):576–82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Poole NA et al. Compliance with surgical after-care following bariatric surgery for morbid obesity: a retrospective study. Obes Surg. 2005;15:261–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zitsman JL et al. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in adolescents: short-term results. J Pediatr Surg. 2011;46(1):157–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dillard BE et al. Initial experience with the adjustable gastric band in morbidly obese US adolescents and recommendations for further investigation. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2007;45(2):240–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Britten N. Qualitative research on health communication: what can it contribute? Patient Educ Couns. 2011;82:384–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Noyes J. et al. Qualitative research and Cochrane reviews, in Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, J.P.T. Higgins and S. Green, Editors. 2009, The Cochrane Collaboration.

  25. Candy B, King M, Jones L, Oliver S. Using qualitative synthesis to explore heterogeneity of complex interventions. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11:1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lincoln YS, Guba EG, Inquiry N. Newbury Park. CA: Sage; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Guest G, Bunce A, Johson L. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods. 2006;18(59):59–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Charmaz K. Qualitative interviewing and grounded theory analysis. In: Gubrium JF, Holstein JA, editors. Handbook of interview research: context & method. Thousand Oaks: CA: Sage; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ezzy D, Liamputtong P. Qualitative research methods. 2nd ed. South Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77--101.

  31. Braun V, Clarke V. Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. London:Sage;2013.

  32. Pontiroli AE et al. Post-surgery adherence to scheduled visits and compliance, more than personality disorders, predict outcomes of bariatric restrictive surgery in morbidly obese patients. Obes Surg. 2007;17(11):1492–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. van Hout GC, Verschure SK, Van Heck GL. Psychosocial predictors of success following bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2005;15(4):552–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Odom J et al. Behavioral predictors of weight regain after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2010;20(3):349–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. van Geelen SM et al. The controversy over pediatric bariatric surgery. Bioethical Inq. 2013;10:227–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Elkins G et al. Noncompliance with behavioral recommendations following bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2005;15:546–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Moroshko I, Brennan L, O’Brien P. Predictors of attrition in bariatric aftercare: a systematic review of the literature. Obes Surg. 2012;22(10):1640–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. D’Agostino NM, Penney A, Zebrack B. Providing developmentally appropriate psychosocial care to adolescent and young adult cancer survivors. Cancer. 2011;117(10 suppl):2319–34.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Nicholas D et al. Evaluation of an online education and support intervention for adolescents with diabetes. Soc Work Health Care. 2012;51:815–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Treadgold CL, Kuperberg A. Been there, done that, wrote the blog: the choices and challenges of supporting adolescents and young adults with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(32):3842–4849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Sutton D, Raines DA. Health-related quality of life: physical and mental functioning after bariatric surgery. Bariatric Nurs Surgical Patient Care. 2008;3(4):271–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Song Z et al. Association between support group attendance and weight loss after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4(2):100–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Elakkary E, Gazayerli MM. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric band: do support groups add to the weight loss? Obes Surg. 2004;14:1139–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Whitney S et al. Support group meeting attendance is associated with better weight loss. Obes Surg. 2008;18(4):391–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Puhl RM, Brownell KD. Confronting and coping with weight stigma: an investigation of overweight and obese adults. Obesity. 2006;14(10):1802–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Fardouly J, Vartanian LR. Changes in weight bias following weight loss: the impact of weight loss method. Int J Obes (Lond). 2012;36:314–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Bocchieri LE, Meana M, Fisher BL. Perceived psychosocial outcomes of gastric bypass surgery: a qualitative study. Obes Surg. 2002;12:781–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Radzik M, Sherer M, Neinstein L. Psychosocial development in normal adolescents. In: Neinstein L, editor. Adolescent health care: a practical guide. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leah Brennan.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Willcox, K., Warren, N., O’Brien, P. et al. Patient and Parent Perspectives of Adolescent Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding (LAGB). OBES SURG 26, 2667–2674 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2156-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2156-6

Keywords

Navigation