Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Management Algorithm for Leaks Following Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Leak after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is a serious complication. No clear algorithm has been described for management.

Methods

We reviewed our prospective database for all leaks after LSG treated at the Bariatric and Metabolic Institute (BMI) Abu Dhabi from 2010 to 2014. Our management algorithm is based on the timing of the LSG leak, nutritional status of the patient, and the presence of stenosis or peritonitis. Acute leaks with or without peritonitis are treated by operatively or utilizing endoscopic stenting, respectively. LSG leaks with stenosis not amenable to endoscopic stenting are treated with laparoscopic Roux en Y esophagojejunostomy (LRYEJ).

Results

We performed 236 LSG without a leak, and 14 LSG leaks were referred to our unit. Mean age was 35.6 years, and 50 % of patients were males. Mean BMI was 37 kg/m2. The patients presented on average 13.9 weeks after LSG. Enteral feeding was used as the primary nutrition route in 85.5 % of patients. Our management strategy was operative in 78.4 % of patients (jejunostomy feeding in 57 % and LRYEJ in 21.4 % of patients) and conservative with or without stents in 21.6 % of patients. Mean in hospital length of stay (LOS) was 5.6 weeks. Our reoperation rate was 7 %. There were no mortalities and one patient 7 % developed pulmonary embolism. None of the patients treated returned with a leak or collection after a mean follow up of 23.6 months.

Conclusion

Treating leaks following LSG based on the timing of presentation, presence of stricture, and malnutrition is safe and effective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. van Rutte PW, Smulders JF, de Zoete JP, et al. Outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy as a primary bariatric procedure. Br J Surg. 2014;101(6):661–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Buchwald H, Oien DM. Metabolic/bariatric surgery worldwide 2011. Obes Surg. 2013;23(4):427–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hutter MM, Schirmer BD, Jones DB, et al. First report from the American College of Surgeons–Bariatric Surgery Center Network: laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy has morbidity and effectiveness positioned between the band and the bypass. Ann Surg. 2011;254(3):410.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Moszkowicz D, Arienzo R, Khettab I, et al. Sleeve gastrectomy severe complications: is it always a reasonable surgical option? Ones Surg. 2013;23(5):676–86.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Casella G, Soricelli E, Rizzeloo M, et al. Non surgical treatment of staple line leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2009;19:821–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Csendes A, Braghetto I, Leon P, et al. Management of leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in patients with obesity. J Gastrointestinal Surg. 2010;149(9):1343–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Abraham A, Rizvon K, Singh J, et al. Successful management of a gastric sleeve leak with an endoscopic stent. Case Rep Gastrointest Med. 2012;2012:205979.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Puli SR, Spofford IS, Thompson CC. Use of self-expandable stents in the treatment of bariatric surgery leaks: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75(2):287–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nimeri A, Mohamed A, El Hassan E, et al. Are results of bariatric surgery different in the Middle East? Early experience of an international bariatric surgery program and an ACS NSQIP outcomes comparison. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216(6):1082–8. PMID:23619317.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. El Hassan E, Mohamed A, Ibrahim M, et al. Single-stage operative management of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy leaks without endoscopic stent placement. Obes Surg. 2013;23(5):722–6. PMID:23460264.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Parikh M, Issa R, McCrillis A, et al. Surgical strategies that may decrease leak after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 9991 cases. Ann Surg. 2013;257(2):231–7. PMID:23023201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rosenthal RJ, Diaz AA, International Sleeve Gastrectomy Expert Panel. International Sleeve Gastrectomy Expert Panel Consensus Statement: best practice guidelines based on experience of >12,000 cases. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8(1):8–19. PMID:22248433.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Aurora AR, Khaitan L, Saber AA. Sleeve gastrectomy and the risk of leak: a systematic analysis of 4,888 patients. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(6):1509.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Eubanks S, Edwards CA, Fearing NM, et al. Use of endoscopic stents to treat anastomotic complications after bariatric surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206(5):935–8. discussion 938- PMID:18471727.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nguyen NT, Nguyen XM, Dholakia C. The use of endoscopic stent in management of leaks after sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2010;20(9):1289–92. PMID:20443150.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Informed Consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Nimeri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nimeri, A., Ibrahim, M., Maasher, A. et al. Management Algorithm for Leaks Following Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy. OBES SURG 26, 21–25 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1751-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1751-2

Keywords

Navigation