Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Biliopancreatic Diversion for Severe Obesity: Long-Term Effectiveness and Nutritional Complications

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Bariatric surgery is currently the treatment of choice for those patients with severe obesity, but the procedure of choice is not clearly established. We describe weight loss and nutritional parameters in severely obese patients after biliopancreatic diversion for 10 years of follow-up.

Methods

Patients were followed by the same multidisciplinary team, and data are shown for 10 years. Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System (BAROS) questionnaire, data regarding the evolution of obesity-related diseases, and nutritional parameters are reported.

Results

Two hundred ninety-nine patients underwent biliopancreatic diversion, 76.1 % women, initial BMI 50.1 kg/m2 (7.2). Weight loss was maintained throughout 10 years with EWL% around 65 % and EBMIL% around 70 %. More than 80 % of the patients showed EWL higher than 50 %. Blood pressure, glucose metabolism, and lipid profile clearly improved after surgery. Mean nutritional parameters remained within the normal range during follow-up. Protein malnutrition affected less than 4 % and anemia up to 16 %. Fat-soluble vitamin levels decreased along the time, with vitamin D deficiency in 61.5 % of patients. No significant differences were found either in nutritional parameters or weight loss regarding gastrectomy or gastric preservation, or common limb length longer or shorter than 55 cm

Conclusions

Biliopancreatic diversion is an effective surgical procedure in terms of weight loss, quality of life, and evolution of obesity-related diseases. Nutritional deficiencies are less frequent than feared for a malabsorptive procedure, but must be taken into account, especially for fat-soluble vitamins.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Buchwald H, Estok R, Fahrbach K, et al. Weight and type 2 diabetes after bariatric surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Med. 2009;122(3):248–56. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.09.041.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Topart P, Becouarn G, Salle A. Five-year follow-up after biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7(2):199–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gracia JA, Martínez M, Elia M, et al. Obesity surgery results depending on technique performed: long-term outcome. Obes Surg. 2009;19(4):432–8. doi:10.1007/s11695-008-9762-x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Skroubis G, Kouri N, Mead N, et al. Long-term results of a prospective comparison of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus a variant of biliopancreatic diversion in a non-superobese population (BMI 35-50 kg/m(2)). Obes Surg. 2014;24(2):197–204. doi:10.1007/s11695-013-1081-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mechanick JI, Youdim A, Jones DB, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists; Obesity Society, American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery. Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient—2013 update: cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013;21 Suppl 1:S1–27. doi:10.1002/oby.20461.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mann JP, Jakes AD, Hayden JD et al. Systematic review of definitions of failure in revisional bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2014.

  7. Oria HE, Moorehead MK. Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System (BAROS). Obes Surg. 1998;8:487–99.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Moorehead MK, Ardelt-Gattinger E, Lechner H, et al. The validation of the Moorehead–Ardelt–Gattinger quality of life questionnaire II. Obes Surg. 2003;13:684–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Thumham DI, Davies JA, Crump BJ, et al. The use 01 different lipids to express serum tocopherol:lipid ratios for the measurement of vitamin E status. Ann Clin Biochem. 1986;23:514–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ford L, Farr J, Morris P, et al. The value of measuring serum cholesterol-adjusted vitamin E in routine practice. Ann Clin Biochem. 2006;43:130–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ascaso JF, Romero P, Real JT, et al. Insulin resistance quantification by fasting insulin plasma values and HOMA index in a non-diabetic population. Med Clin (Barc). 2001;117(14):530–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Marceau P, Biron S, Hould FS, et al. Duodenal switch: long-term results. Obes Surg. 2007;17(11):1421–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Moroshko I, Brennan L, O'Brien P. Predictors of attrition in bariatric after care: a systematic review of the literature. Obes Surg. 2012;22(10):1640–7. doi:10.1007/s11695-012-0691-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Buchwald H, Estok R, Fahrbach K, et al. Weight and type 2 diabetes after bariatric surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Med. 2009;122(3):248-256.e5. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.09.041.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Skroubis G, Kouri N, Mead N, et al. Long-term results of a prospective comparison of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus a variant of biliopancreatic diversion in a non-superobese population (BMI 35-50 kg/m(2)). Obes Surg. 2014;24(2):197–204. doi:10.1007/s11695-013-1081-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Marinari GM, Murelli F, Camerini G, et al. A 15-year evaluation of biliopancreatic diversion according to the Bariatric Analysis Reporting Outcome System (BAROS). Obes Surg. 2004;14:325–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dalcanale L, Oliveira CP, Faintuch J, et al. Long-term nutritional outcome after gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2010;20(2):181–7. doi:10.1007/s11695-009-9916-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mason EE, Hesson WW. Informed consent for obesity surgery. Obes Surg. 1998;8:419–28.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Scopinaro N. Thirty-five years of biliopancreatic diversion: notes on gastrointestinal physiology to complete the published information useful for a better understanding and clinical use of the operation. Obes Surg. 2012;22(3):427–32. doi:10.1007/s11695-011-0554-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Avinoah E, Ovnat A, Charuzi I. Nutritional status years after Roux-En-Y gastric bypass surgery. Surgery. 1992;111:137–42.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Buffington C, Walker B, Cowan Jr GS, et al. Vitamin D deficiency in the morbidly obese. Obes Surg. 1993;3:421–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chapin BL, LeMar HJ, Knodel DH, et al. Secondary hyperparathyroidism following biliopancreatic diversion. Arch Surg. 1996;131:1048–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Marceau P, Hould FS, Simard S, et al. Biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch. World J Surg. 1998;22:947–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Alvarez-Leite JI. Nutrient deficiencies secondary to bariatric surgery. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2004;7:569–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Vazquez C, Morejon E, Muñoz C, et al. Repercusión nutricional de la cirugía bariátrica segúntécnica de Scopinaro: análisis de 40 casos. Nutr Hosp. 2003;18:189–93.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Berger JR. The neurological complications of bariatric surgery. Arch Neurol. 2004;61:1185–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Brolin RE, Gorman JH, Gorman RC, et al. Are vitamin B12 and folate deficiencies clinically important after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass? J Gastrointest Surg. 1998;2:436–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Crea N, Pata G, Di Betta E, et al. Long-term results of biliopancreatic diversion with or without gastric preservation for morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2011;21(2):139–45. doi:10.1007/s11695-010-0333-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Vidal P, Ramón JM, Goday A, et al. Lack of adherence to follow-up visits after bariatric surgery: reasons and outcome. Obes Surg. 2014;24(2):179–83. doi:10.1007/s11695-013-1094-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Topart P, Becouarn G, Sallé A, et al. Biliopancreatic diversion requires multiple vitamin and micronutrient adjustments within 2 years of surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014. doi:10.1016/j.soard.2014.02.007.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

Ballesteros-Pomar MD, González de Francisco T, Urioste-Fondo A, González-Herraez L, Calleja-Fernández A, Vidal-Casariego A, Simó-Fernández V, and Cano-Rodríguez I declare no conflict of interest. For this type of study formal consent is not required

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to María D. Ballesteros-Pomar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ballesteros-Pomar, M.D., González de Francisco, T., Urioste-Fondo, A. et al. Biliopancreatic Diversion for Severe Obesity: Long-Term Effectiveness and Nutritional Complications. OBES SURG 26, 38–44 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1719-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1719-2

Keywords

Navigation