Abstract
Introduction
Bariatric surgery has proven safe and effective for long-term weight loss in morbidly obese patients. Readmissions within 30 days of discharge have become an important metric for quality of care. Sleeve gastrectomy is a common bariatric procedure, but data regarding early readmission is sparse. The purpose of this study is to determine what, if any, demographic or technical factors influence returns to the hospital or readmission following sleeve gastrectomy.
Methods
All laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomies (n = 200) performed at a single community hospital from February 2009 to November 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic, technical, length of stay, return to Emergency Department (ED) and readmission data were gathered for each patient. The data were analyzed to determine what factors were related to early return to the Emergency Department or readmission.
Results
Demographics were similar to other studies, with a male to female ratio of 1:4. Patients returning to the ED or readmitted within 30 days were statistically younger than those not returning. None of the other demographic, social, technical, or comorbid conditions considered were associated with a statistically significant risk of readmission or return to the ED within 30 days.
Conclusion
Although the only statistically significant difference among the groups studied was age, trends toward significance exist in minority ethnicity and comorbid asthma. These factors have been associated with increased complications in other types of surgery. Larger, multi-institutional studies are needed to further evaluate these and other risk factors for readmission following bariatric surgery.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Nguyen NT et al. Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass: a randomized study of outcomes, quality of life, and costs. Ann Surg. 2001;234(3):279–89. discussion 289-91.
Ballantyne GH et al. Predictors of prolonged hospital stay following open and laparoscopic gastric bypass for morbid obesity: body mass index, length of surgery, sleep apnea, asthma, and the metabolic syndrome. Obes Surg. 2004;14(8):1042–50.
Dallal RM, Datta T, Braitman LE. Medicare and Medicaid status predicts prolonged length of stay after bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3(6):592–6.
Fares 2nd LG et al. 23-Hour stay outcomes for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in a small, teaching community hospital. Am Surg. 2008;74(12):1206–10.
dos Santos Moraes Jr I et al. Hospital discharge in the day following open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: is it feasible and safe? Obes Surg. 2009;19(3):281–6.
Dallal RM, Trang A. Analysis of perioperative outcomes, length of hospital stay, and readmission rate after gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(3):754–8.
Cooney RN et al. The impact of a clinical pathway for gastric bypass surgery on resource utilization. J Surg Res. 2001;98(2):97–101.
Huerta S et al. Reduced length of stay by implementation of a clinical pathway for bariatric surgery in an academic health care center. Am Surg. 2001;67(12):1128–35.
Sasse KC et al. Outpatient weight loss surgery: initiating a gastric bypass and gastric banding ambulatory weight loss surgery center. JSLS. 2009;13(1):50–5.
Dorman RB et al. Risk for hospital readmission following bariatric surgery. PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e32506.
Hong B et al. Factors associated with readmission after laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8(6):691–5.
Kellogg TA et al. Patterns of readmission and reoperation within 90 days after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5(4):416–23.
Stellato TA et al. Two-day length of stay following open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: is it feasible, safe and reasonable? Obes Surg. 2004;14(1):27–34.
Pratt GM et al. Demographics and outcomes at American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Centers of Excellence. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(4):795–9.
Pratt GM, McLees B, Pories WJ. The ASBS Bariatric Surgery Centers of Excellence program: a blueprint for quality improvement. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2006;2(5):497–503. discussion 503.
McCarty TM et al. Optimizing outcomes in bariatric surgery: outpatient laparoscopic gastric bypass. Ann Surg. 2005;242(4):494–8. discussion 498-501.
Watkins BM et al. Adjustable gastric banding in an ambulatory surgery center. Obes Surg. 2005;15(7):1045–9.
Kormanova K et al. Is laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding a day surgery procedure? Obes Surg. 2004;14(9):1237–40.
Lemanu DP et al. Randomized clinical trial of enhanced recovery versus standard care after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Br J Surg. 2013;100(4):482–9.
Awad S et al. Enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery (ERABS): clinical outcomes from a tertiary referral bariatric centre. Obes Surg. 2014;24(5):753–8.
Dailey EA et al. Risk factors for readmission of orthopaedic surgical patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(11):1012–9.
Hannan EL et al. Predictors of readmission for complications of coronary artery bypass graft surgery. JAMA. 2003;290(6):773–80.
Iannuzzi JC et al. Risk score for unplanned vascular readmissions. J Vasc Surg. 2014;59(5):1340–7. e1.
Baker MT et al. Length of stay and impact on readmission rates after laparoscopic gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2006;2(4):435–9.
Yeats M et al. The use and modification of clinical pathways to achieve specific outcomes in bariatric surgery. Am Surg. 2005;71(2):152–4.
Weller WE, Rosati C, Hannan EL. Relationship between surgeon and hospital volume and readmission after bariatric operation. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204(3):383–91.
Conflict of Interest
Dr. Lutfi is a consultant for Ethicon, GORE, and Allergan. Dr. Willson, Dr. Gomberawalla, and Ms. Mahoney declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Willson, T.D., Gomberawalla, A., Mahoney, K. et al. Factors Influencing 30-Day Emergency Visits and Readmissions after Sleeve Gastrectomy: Results from a Community Bariatric Center. OBES SURG 25, 975–981 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-014-1546-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-014-1546-x