Abstract
Background
The Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q) is increasingly used in studies with bariatric surgery patients although little is known about psychometric properties of this self-report measure in this clinical group. The current study evaluated the factor structure and construct validity of the EDE-Q in bariatric surgery candidates.
Methods
Participants were a consecutive series of 174 obese bariatric surgery candidates who completed the EDE-Q and a battery of behavioral and psychological measures.
Results
Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) revealed an inadequate fit for the original EDE-Q structure but revealed a good fit for an alternative structure suggested by recent research with obese samples. CFA supported a seven-item, three-factor structure; the three factors were interpreted as dietary restraint, shape/weight overvaluation, and body dissatisfaction. The three factors converged with other relevant collateral measures.
Conclusions
These factor analytic findings, which replicate recent findings from studies with diverse obese samples, demonstrated convergent validity. Implications of these findings for clinical assessment and research with bariatric surgery patients are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dixon JB, Straznicky NE, Lambert EA, et al. Surgical approaches to the treatment of obesity. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;8:429–37.
Sjöström L, Lindroos A, Peltonen M, et al. Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years after bariatric surgery. New Engl J Med. 2004;351:2683–93.
Sarwer DB, Wadden TA, Fabricatore AN. Psychosocial and behavioral aspects of bariatric surgery. Obes Res. 2005;13:639–48.
Wadden TA, Faulconbridge LF, Jones-Corneille LR, et al. Binge eating disorder and the outcome of bariatric surgery at one year: a prospective observational study. Obesity. 2011;19:1220–8.
White MA, Masheb RM, Rothschild BS, et al. The prognostic significance of regular binge eating in extremely obese gastric bypass patients: 12-month postoperative outcomes. J Clin Psychiat. 2006;67:1928–35.
White MA, Kalarchian MA, Masheb RM, et al. Loss of control over eating predicts outcomes in bariatric surgery: a prospective 24-month follow-up study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2010;71:175–84.
Grilo CM, Masheb RM, Wilson GT. A comparison of different methods for assessing the features of eating disorders in patients with binge eating disorder. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2001;69:317–22.
Grilo CM, Masheb RM, Wilson GT. Different methods for assessing the features of eating disorders in patients with binge eating disorder: a replication. Obes Res. 2001;9:418–22.
Fairburn CG, Beglin SJ. Assessment of eating disorders: interview or self-report questionnaire? Int J Eat Disord. 1994;16:363–70.
Barnes RD, Masheb RM, White MA, et al. Comparison of methods for identifying and assessing obese patients with binge eating disorder in primary care settings. Int J Eat Disord. 2011;44:157–63.
Kalarchian MA, Wilson GT, Brolin RE, et al. Assessment of eating disorders in bariatric surgery candidates: self-report questionnaire versus interview. Int J Eat Disord. 2000;28:465–9.
de Zwaan M, Mitchell JE, Swan-Kremeier L, et al. A comparison of different methods of assessing the features of eating disorders in post-gastric bypass patients: a pilot study. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2004;12:380–6.
Elder KA, Grilo CM, Masheb RM, et al. Comparison of two self-report instruments for assessing binge eating in bariatric surgery candidates. Behav Res Ther. 2006;44:545–60.
Reas DL, Grilo CM, Masheb RM. Reliability of the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire in patients with binge eating disorder. Beh Res Ther. 2006;44:43–51.
Mond JM, Hay PJ, Rodgers B, et al. Temporal stability of the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire. Int J Eat Disord. 2004;36:195–203.
Berg KC, Peterson CB, Frazier P, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the eating disorder examination and eating disorder examination-questionnaire: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Eat Disord. 2012;45:428–38.
Peterson CB, Crosby RD, Wonderlich SA, et al. Psychometric properties of the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire: factor structure and internal consistency. Int J Eat Disord. 2007;40:386–9.
Hrabosky JI, White MA, Masheb RM, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire for bariatric surgery candidates. Obesity. 2008;16:763–9.
Mannucci E, Ricca V, di Bernardo M, et al. Psychometric properties of EDE 12.0D in obese patients without binge eating disorder. Eat Weight Disord. 1997;2:144–9.
Wade TD, Byrne S, Bryant-Waugh R. The Eating Disorder Examination: norms and construct validity with young and middle adolescent girls. Int J Eat Disord. 2008;41:551–8.
Bryne SM, Allen KL, Lampard AM, et al. The factor structure of the Eating Disorder Examination in clinical and community samples. Int J Eat Disord. 2010;43:260–5.
Grilo CM, Crosby RD, Peterson CB, et al. Factor structure of the Eating disorder Examination interview in patients with binge eating disorder. Obesity. 2010;18:977–81.
Grilo CM, Crosby RD, White MA. Spanish-language Eating disorder Examination Interview: factor structure in Latino/as. Eat Beh. 2012;13:410–3.
Fairburn CG, Cooper Z. The Eating Disorder Examination (12th Edition). In: Fairburn CG, Wilson GT, editors. Binge eating: nature, assessment, and treatment. New York: Guilford; 1993. p. 317–60.
Cooper PJ, Taylor MJ, Cooper Z, et al. The development and validation of the Body Shape Questionnaire. Int J Eat Disord. 1987;6:485–94.
Rosen JC, Jones A, Ramirez E, et al. Body Shape Questionnaire: studies of validity and reliability. Int J Eat Disord. 1996;20:315–9.
Beck AT, Steer R. Manual for Revised Beck Depression Inventory. New York: Psychological Corporation; 1987.
Beck AT, Steer R, Garbin M. Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: 25 years of evaluation. Clin Psychol Rev. 1988;8:77–100.
Rosenberg M. Conceiving the self. New York: Basic; 1979.
Griffiths RA, Beumont PJV, Giannakopoulos E, et al. Measuring self-esteem in dieting disordered patients: the validity of the Rosenberg and Coopersmith contrasted. Int J Eat Disord. 1999;25:227–31.
Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model. 1999;6:1–55.
Hrabosky JI, Masheb RM, White MA, et al. Overvaluation of shape/weight in binge eating disorder. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2007;75:175–80.
Masheb RM, Grilo CM, Burke-Martindale CH, et al. Evaluating oneself by shape and weight is not the same as being dissatisfied about shape and weight: a longitudinal examination in severely obese gastric bypass patients. Int J Eat Disord. 2006;39:716–20.
Grilo CM, Hrabosky JI, Allison KC, et al. Overvaluation of shape and weight in binge eating disorder and overweight controls: refinement of a diagnostic construct. J Abn Psychol. 2008;117:414–9.
Grilo CM, Masheb RM, White MA. Significance of overvaluation of shape/weight in binge eating disorder: comparative study with overweight and bulimia nervosa. Obesity. 2010;18:499–504.
Grilo CM, Masheb RM, Crosby RD. Predictors and moderators of response to cognitive behavioral therapy and medication for the treatment of binge eating disorder. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2012;80:897–906.
Grilo CM, White MA, Gueorguieva R, et al. Predictive significance of the overvaluation of shape/weight in obese patients with binge eating disorder: findings from a randomized controlled trial with 12-month follow-up. Psychol Med. 2012. doi:10.1017/S0033291712002097.
Acknowledgments
Dr. Grilo was supported, in part, by National Institutes of Health grant K24 DK070052. Dr. Henderson was supported by the Rudd Foundation.
Conflict of Interest
Drs. Grilo, Henderson, Bell, and Crosby report no conflicts of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grilo, C.M., Henderson, K.E., Bell, R.L. et al. Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire Factor Structure and Construct Validity in Bariatric Surgery Candidates. OBES SURG 23, 657–662 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-012-0840-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-012-0840-8