Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effectiveness of the Transoral Endoscopic Vertical Gastroplasty (TOGa®): a Good Balance Between Weight Loss and Complications, if Compared with Gastric Bypass and Biliopancreatic Diversion

  • Clinical Research
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The effectiveness of restrictive procedures has been inferior to that of malabsorbitive ones. Recent variants of restrictive procedures, i.e., gastric banding and sleeve gastrectomy, confirm the strive for more efficacious solutions with less complications. We investigated the balance between effectiveness and complications for a new restrictive procedure, a Transoral Endoscopic Vertical Gastroplasty (TOGa®)

Methods

Seventy-nine morbidly obese patients were submitted to one out of three surgical procedures: TOGa® (29 patients), laparoscopic gastric bypass (LRYGBP; 20 patients), and biliopancreatic diversion (BPD; 30 patients). Mean BMI were 41.7 (35.4–46.6), 44.8 (36.4–54), and 47.5 (41–60.3), respectively. All the patients reached a 2-year follow-up.

Results

In TOGa® group BMI, respectively at 12 and 24 months, was 34.5 and 35.5, with 44 and 48.3 % of patients with BMI lower than 35. In LRYGBP group, BMI was 30.7 and 29.2 kg/m2, with 80 and 85 % of patients with BMI < 35. In BPD group, BMI was 30 and 29.6 kg/m2, with 100 and 93.3 % of patients with BMI < 35. In TOGa® group, 59 % of patients with an initial BMI < 45 reached a BMI < 35, in comparison to 48 % recorded in the whole group and to 14.3 % in patients with initial BMI ≥ 45.

Conclusions

In selected patients, TOGa®, was associated with good results after two years in terms of weight loss, even in comparison with LRYGBP and BPD. Minimal trauma, absence of complications, and short hospital stay justify this procedure for patients with low BMI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. NIH Conference. Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity. Consensus Development Conference Panel. Ann Int Med. 1991;115:956–961.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Devière J, Ojeda Valdes G, Cuevas Herrera L, et al. Safety, feasibility and weight loss after transoral gastroplasty: first human multicenter study. Surg Endosc. 2008;22(3):589–98 Epub 2007 Nov 1. Erratum in: Surg Endosc. 2008 Mar;22(3):599. PubMed PMID: 17973163.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Moreno C, Closset J, Dugardeyn S, et al. Transoral gastroplasty is safe, feasible, and induces significant weight loss in morbidly obese patients: results of the second human pilot study. Endoscopy. 2008;40(5):406–13. Erratum in: Endoscopy. 2008 Jun;40(6):537. PubMed PMID: 18459077.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;292(14):1724–37. Review. Erratum in: JAMA. 2005 Apr 13;293(14):1728. PubMed PMID: 15479938.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Buchwald H, Estok R, Fahrbach K, et al. Weight and type 2 diabetes after bariatric surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Med. 2009;122(3):248–256.e5. Review. PubMed PMID: 19272486.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. MacLean LD, Rhode BM, Forse RA, et al. Surgery for obesity—an update of a randomized trial. Obes Surg. 1995;5(2):145–50. PubMed PMID: 10733802.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Di Lorenzo N, Furbetta F, Favretti F, et al. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding via pars flaccida versus perigastric positioning: technique, complications, and results in 2,549 patients. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(7):1519–23. Epub 2010 Mar 31. PubMed PMID: 20354885.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Favretti F, Segato G, Ashton D, et al. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in 1,791 consecutive obese patients: 12-year results. Obes Surg. 2007;17(2):168–75. PubMed PMID: 17476867.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. American Society for Bariatric Surgery Standards Committee, 2004–2005, Oria HE, Carrasquilla C, et al. Guidelines for weight calculations and follow-up in bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2005;1(1):67–8. PubMed PMID: 16925214.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Montero PN, Stefanidis D, Norton HJ, et al. Reported excess weight loss after bariatric surgery could vary significantly depending on calculation method: a plea for standardization. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011; 7(4):531-534.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Deitel M, Gawdat K, Melissas J. Reporting weight loss 2007. Obes Surg. 2007;17(5):565–8. Review. Erratum in: Obes Surg. 2007;17(7):996.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Baltasar A, Serra C, Bou R, et al. Expected body mass index after bariatric surgery. Cir Esp. 2009;86(5):308–12. Epub 2009 Jul 31. PubMed PMID: 19646684.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dixon JB, McPhail T, O'Brien PE. Minimal reporting requirements for weight loss: current methods not ideal. Obes Surg. 2005;15(7):1034–9. PubMed PMID: 16105403.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Garb J, Welch G, Zagarins S, et al. Bariatric surgery for the treatment of morbid obesity: a meta-analysis of weight loss outcomes for laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding and laparoscopic gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2009;19(10):1447–55. Epub 2009 Aug 5. Review. PubMed PMID: 19655209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Biron S, Hould FS, Lebel S, et al. Twenty years of biliopancreatic diversion: what is the goal of the surgery? Obes Surg. 2004;14(2):160–4. PubMed PMID: 15018742.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Varela JE, Frey W. Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in mildly obese (BMI < 35 kg/m2) compared to severely obese. Obes Surg. 2011;21(4):421–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. FDA NEWS RELEASE, Feb 16 2011.

  18. Valera-Mora ME, Simeoni B, Gagliardi L, et al. Predictors of weight loss and reversal of comorbidities in malabsorbitive bariatric surgery. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;81(6):1292–7. PubMed PMID: 15941878.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cunneen SA. Review of meta-analytic comparisons of bariatric surgery with a focus on laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4(3 Suppl):S47–55. Review. PubMed PMID:18501315.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Singhal R, Bryant C, Kitchen M, et al. Band slippage and erosion after laparoscopic gastric banding: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(12):2980–6. Epub 2010 Jul 31. PubMed PMID: 20680349.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Stroh C, Hohmann U, Schramm H, et al. Fourteen-year long-term results after gastric banding. J Obes. 2011;2011:128451. Epub 2010 Dec 22. PubMed PMID: 21234392; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3017910.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lanthaler M, Aigner F, Kinzl J, et al. Long-term results and complications following adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2010;20(8):1078–85. PubMed PMID: 20496124.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Mrs. Carolina Gualtieri for her precious cooperation as Clinical Research Coordinator. Special thanks to GianLuigi Conte, M.D. and his psychiatric team, for patient assistance.

Conflict of Interest Statement

Costamagna G. and Perri V have a potential conflict of interest as they were both supported by a grant from Satiety, Inc, U.S.A. All the other authors, (Nanni G., Familiari P, Mor A., Iaconelli A., Rubino F., Boldrini G, Salerno MP, Leccesi L, Iesari S., Sollazzi L, Perilli W, Castagneto M, and Mingrone G) declare no conflict of interest directly or indirectly related to this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giuseppe Nanni.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nanni, G., Familiari, P., Mor, A. et al. Effectiveness of the Transoral Endoscopic Vertical Gastroplasty (TOGa®): a Good Balance Between Weight Loss and Complications, if Compared with Gastric Bypass and Biliopancreatic Diversion. OBES SURG 22, 1897–1902 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-012-0770-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-012-0770-5

Keywords

Navigation