Skip to main content
Log in

Frequency of Adjustments and Weight Loss after Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding

  • Clinical Report
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding is an effective procedure for weight loss. Long-term follow-up and band adjustments are crucial to achieve sustained weight loss, but the optimal frequency is unknown. We compare the weight loss of two patient groups adjusted at different frequencies. A 24-month analysis was conducted to 280 patients (156 from an academic center and 124 from an outpatient surgery center). Each center’s patients were stratified into 6-month groups according to the length of follow-up. These groups were compared between the settings for average adjustments per month and percent excess weight loss (%EWL). Patient subgroup 0–6 months had 0.6 adjustments/month (adj/mo) and 18.3 % EWL at AC compared to 0.7 adj/mo and 19.1 % EWL at OC. Subgroup 6–12 months had 0.4 adj/mo and 27.2 % EWL at AC compared to 0.5 adj/mo and 33.4 % EWL at OC. Subgroup 12–18 months had 0.3 adj/mo and 25.3 % EWL at AC compared to 0.5 adj/mo and 45.6 % EWL at OC. Subgroup 18–24 months had 0.3 adj/mo and 30.9 % EWL at AC compared to 0.3 adj/mo and 42.2 % EWL at OC. Analysis of variance crossing 6-month groups with facility produced significant effects for groups (F = 15.52, df = 4.290, p < 0.001), center (F = 14.28, df = 1.290, p < 0.001), and the center-by-group interaction (F = 3.01, df = 4.290, p < 0.02). Our data suggest that more frequent adjustments result in increased EWL, but optimal frequency remains unknown. We believe that the difference noted between the clinics stems from accessibility to adjustments. Additional data, such as %EWL at smaller monthly intervals and the point of diminishing results, should be investigated in future studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Folope V, Hellot MF, Kuhn JM, et al. Weight loss and quality of life after bariatric surgery: a study of 200 patients after vertical gastroplasty or adjustable gastric banding. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2008;62:1022–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, McDowell MA, et al. Obesity among adults in the United States—no statistically significant change since 2003–2004. NCHS data brief no. 1. National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD; 2007. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19389313. Accessed 15 April 2000.

  3. O’Brien PE, Dixon JB, Brown W, et al. The laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (Lap-Band®): a prospective study of medium-term effects on weight, health and quality of life. Obes Surg. 2002;12:652–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia’s health 2004. Canberra: AIHW; 2004. AIHW Ca. No. AUS-44.

  5. Thompson D, Wolf AM. The medical-care cost burden of obesity. Obes Rev. 2001;2:189–97.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Colditz GA. Economic costs of obesity and inactivity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999;31(11):S663–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gastrointestinal Surgery for Severe Obesity. NIH Consens Statement Online. 2010;9(1):1–20. http://consensus.nih.gov/1991/1991gisurgeryobesity084html.htm.

  8. Lancaster RT, Hutter MM. Bands and bypasses: 30-day morbidity and mortality of bariatric surgical procedures as assessed by prospective, multi-center, risk-adjusted ACS-NSQIP data. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:2554–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pories WJ. Bariatric surgery: risks and rewards. J Clin Endocinol Metab. 2008;93(11):S89–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Surgery for morbid obesity: what patients should know. Toronto: FD-Communications Inc.; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sarker S, Myers JA, Shayani V. Superior weight loss with patient-driven, fluoroscopically guided band adjustment following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. JSLS. 2005;9:269–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Favretti F, O’Brien PE, Dixon JB. Patient management after LAP-BAND placement. Am J Surg. 2002;184:38S–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shen R, Dugay G, Rajaram K, et al. Impact of patient follow-up on weight loss after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2004;14:514–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. American College of Surgeons. Recommendations for facilities performing bariatric surgery. Bull Am Coll Surg. 2000;85(9):20–3.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Philips E, Ponce J, Cunneen SA, et al. Safety and effectiveness of realize adjustable gastric band: 3-year prospective study in the United States. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5(5):588–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

There were no conflicts of interest with this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan A. Myers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Valle, E., Luu, M.B., Autajay, K. et al. Frequency of Adjustments and Weight Loss after Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding. OBES SURG 22, 1880–1883 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-012-0748-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-012-0748-3

Keywords

Navigation