Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Portrayal of Bariatric Surgery in the UK Print Media

  • Clinical Research
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Bariatric and metabolic surgery is a recent introduction into mainstream surgical practice. It has been shown to have a beneficial effect on the health of an individual and a positive economic impact for society. Nonetheless, bariatric surgery faces a problem of perception from both the public and healthcare commissioners. The media functions as an interface between the medical community, government and the public. It therefore plays a critical role in shaping public opinion regarding health issues.

Methods

Articles relating to bariatric surgery in the ten most frequently read UK daily newspapers were assessed over a 24-month period (January 2010–December 2011). Each article was rated via a five-point scale from very negative (1) to very positive (5) by two independent assessors to produce an average score.

Results

A total of 197 relevant articles were identified and analysed for content. Sixty-four (33 %) of all articles were negatively slanted (mean score 1–2.5), 105 (53 %) were positive (mean score 3.5–5) and 28 (14 %) were neutral (mean score 2.5–3.5). The average score of all articles was 3.3 (neutral, but slightly positive).

Conclusions

The print media will influence public perceptions of bariatric surgery. There is huge variation in how bariatric surgery is reported, but overall the coverage is neutral. We feel that negative reportage distorts the overall awareness of bariatric surgery and may affect both how and when the obese seek medical intervention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hawkins SC, Osborne A, Finlay IG, Alagaratnam S, Edmond JR, Welbourn R. Paid work increases and state benefit claims decrease after bariatric surgery. Obesity Surgery. 2007;17:434–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dallal RM, Chernoff A, O'Leary MP, Smith JA, Braverman JD, Quebbemann BB. Sexual dysfunction is common in the morbidly obese male and improves after gastric bypass surgery. Journal of the American College of Surgery. 2008;207:859–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Monkhouse SJ, Morgan JD, Bates SE, Norton SA. An overview of the management of morbid obesity. Postgradutate Medical Journal. 2009;85:678–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cooper CP, Roter DL. “If it bleeds it leads”? Attributes of TV health news stories that drive viewer attention. Public Health Reporting. 2000;115:331–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Williamson JML, Skinner CI, Hocken DB. Death and illness in the media. International Journal of Clinical Practice. 2011;65:547–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. The PLoS Medicine editors. False hopes, unwarranted fears: the trouble with medical news stories. PLoS Medicine. 2008;5:681–3.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Williamson JML, Jones IH, Hocken DB. How does the media profile of cancer compare with prevalence? Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. 2011;93:9–128.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Young ME, Geoffrey RN, Humphries KR. Medicine in the popular press: the influence of media on perceptions of disease. PLoS One. 2008;3:e3552.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schwitzer G, Mudur G, Henry D, Wilson A, Goozner M, Simbra M, Sweet M, Baverstock KA. What are the roles and responsibilites of the media in disseminating health information. PLoS Medicine. 2005;2:576–82.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Holder HD, Treno AJ. Media advocacy in community prevention: news as a means to advance policy change. Addiction. 1997;92:89–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chapman S, McLeod K, Wakefield M, Holding S. Impact of celebrity illness on breast cancer screening: Kylie Minogue’s breast cancer diagnosis. MJA. 2005;183:247–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Williamson JML, Hocken DB. Pancreatic cancer in the media: the Swayze shift. The Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. 2010;92:537–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Puhl RM, Heuer CA. The stigma of obesity: a review and update. Obesity. 2009;17:941–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Teachman BA, Brownell KD. Implicit anti-fat bias among health professionals: is anyone immune? International Journal of Obesity. 2001;25:1525–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Schwartz MB, Chambliss HO, Brownell KD, Blair SN, Bilington C. Weight bias among health professionals specializing in obesity. Obesity Research. 2003;11:1033–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sandberg H. A matter of looks: the framing of obesity in four Swedish daily newspapers. Communications. 2007;32:447–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Daily Mail. How the Fern Britten effect is fueling the rise in weight loss surgery. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1306569/Fern-Britton-effect-fuels-weight-loss-surgery-rise.html

  18. National Readership Survey. NRS readership estimates—newspapers and supplements. October 2009–September 2010. http://www.nrs.co.uk/toplinereadership.html (accessed February 2011)

  19. Office for National Statistics. Press release: UK population grows to 61.4 million. www.statistics.gov (downloaded September 2009)

  20. Williamson J, Hocken D. How much vascular disease is reported by the UK media? International Journal of Clinical Practice. 2010;64:1167–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Puhl RM, Schwartz MB, Brownell KD. Impact of perceived consensus on stereotypes about obese people: a new approach for reducing bias. Health Psychology. 2005;24:517–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Teachman BA, Gapinski KD, Brownell KD, Rawlins M, Jeyaram S. Demonstrations of implicit anti-fat bias: the impact of providing causal information and evoking empathy. Health Psychology. 2003;22:68–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and Bariatric Surgery, The Royal Gloucestershire Hospital, Great Western Road, Gloucester, GL1 3NN, UK

    J. M. L. Williamson, J. A. Rink & D. H. Hewin

Authors
  1. J. M. L. Williamson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. A. Rink
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. H. Hewin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. M. L. Williamson.

Electronic Supplementary Materials

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(PDF 510 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Williamson, J.M.L., Rink, J.A. & Hewin, D.H. The Portrayal of Bariatric Surgery in the UK Print Media. OBES SURG 22, 1690–1694 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-012-0701-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-012-0701-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation