Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Central Pedicled Breast Reduction Technique in Male Patients After Massive Weight Loss

  • Technical Innovation
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Male patients after massive weight loss often suffer from redundant skin and soft tissue in the anterior and lateral chest region, causing various deformities of pseudogynecomastia. Techniques with free or pedicled nipple–areola complex (NAC) transposition are widely accepted. The authors present their approach to male breast reduction with preservation of the NAC on a central dermoglandular pedicle and a wide elliptical tissue excision of breast and lateral thorax tissue in combination with liposuction. Male breast reduction was performed on patients after moderate to massive weight loss due to diet or bariatric procedures. Former procedures included free nipple–areola grafts or inferior pedicled techniques for NAC preservation. As a modification, we performed a central pedicled breast reduction on nine male patients with excessive liposuction of the pedicle and a horizontal elliptical skin removal, allowing for sufficient tissue removal at the lateral thorax. From October 2010 until June 2011, nine male patients had central pedicled breast reconstructions after massive weight loss. Mean age was 29.1 years, mean preoperative body mass index was 29.2, and mean preoperative weight loss was 63.9 kg. The chest wall improvement was rated “very good” by eight patients. No major complications occurred in all nine patients. Male chest deformities after massive weight loss can be dealt by several approaches. The optimal scar positioning and the preservation of NAC may be the most challenging aspects of these procedures. Therefore, the preservation of the NAC on a central dermoglandular pedicle with a horizontal submammary scar course may optimize the esthetic outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Braunstein GD. Gynecomastia. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1229.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Simon BE, Hoffman S, Kahn S. Classification of gynecomastia. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1973;51:48.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rohrich R, Ha R, Kenkel J, et al. Classifications and management of gynecomastia: defining the role of ultrasound-assisted liposuction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111:909.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gheita A. Gynecomastia: the horizontal ellipse method for its correction. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2008;32(5):795–801.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gusenoff JA, Coon D, Rubin JP. Pseudogynecomastia after massive weight loss: detectability of technique, patient satisfaction, and classification. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122(5):1301–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Aly AS. Body contouring after massive weight loss. St. Louis: Quality Medical; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stoff A, Reichenberger MA, Richter DF. Male breast contouring after massive weight loss. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2006;38(4):209–16. German.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Beckenstein MS, Windle BH, Stroup Jr RT. Anatomical parameters for nipple position and areolar diameter in males. Ann Plast Surg. 1996;36:33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Beer GM, Budi S, Seifert B, et al. Configuration and localization of the nipple–areola complex in men. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108:1947.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Shulman O, Badani E, Wolf Y, et al. Appropriate location of the nipple–areola complex in males. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108:348.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hodgson EL, Fruhstorfer BH, Malata CM. Ultrasonic liposuction in the treatment of gynecomastia. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116:646.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tashkandi M, Al-Qattan MM, Hassanain JM, et al. The surgical management of high grade gynecomastia. Ann Plast Surg. 2004;53:17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kornstein AN, Cinelli PB. Inferior pedicle reduction technique for larger forms of gynecomastia. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1992;16:331.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Persichetti P, Berloco M, Casadei RM, et al. Gynecomastia and the complete circumareolar approach in the surgical management of skin redundancy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107:948.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Song AY, Jean RD, Hurwitz DJ, et al. A classification of contour deformities after bariatric weight loss: the Pittsburgh rating scale. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116:1535.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mladick RA, Hunstad JP, Pitman GH, et al. Practice forum: male body contouring. Aesthet Surg J. 2006;26:307.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Richter DF, Stoff A. The upper lateral thoracic lift (ULTL). Volume 2, number 2. Plastic surgery pulse news. St. Louis: Quality Medical; 2010.

  18. Richter DF, Stoff A. Back and lateral fold contouring. In: Nahai F, editor. The art of aesthetic surgery: principles and techniques. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Quality Medical; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

Dr. Stoff, Dr. Velasco, and Dr. Richter have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Stoff.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stoff, A., Velasco-Laguardia, F.J. & Richter, D.F. Central Pedicled Breast Reduction Technique in Male Patients After Massive Weight Loss. OBES SURG 22, 445–451 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-011-0583-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-011-0583-y

Keywords

Navigation