Skip to main content
Log in

Revisional Bariatric Surgery by Conversion to Gastric Bypass or Sleeve—Good Short-Term Outcomes at Higher Risks

  • Clinical Report
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This is a retrospective study of prospectively collected data from 34 patients who had revisional bariatric surgery at a single centre. The aim was to report the indications for revisional surgery, operative time, conversion to open surgery, mortality, hospital stay, early and late complications, reoperations and short-term efficacy. From 2006 to 2011, 31 patients who formerly had been operated for morbid obesity with restrictive operations and 3 patients who had been operated in the upper abdomen for other morbidities (fundoplications 2, Heller's myotomy 1) underwent a revisional Roux-en-Y gastric bypass operation (n = 30) or sleeve gastrectomy (n = 4). Demographic data, perioperative characteristics and follow-up data were entered prospectively in the hospital's database for bariatric patients. Twenty-five operations were done by laparoscopic and nine by open technique. The mean operative time was 113.17 (33.98, 54–184) min. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 3.25 (5.71, 1–32) days. Intra-operative complications occurred in six patients (17.65%), postoperative complications in nine (26.47%), and major complications in three patients (8.82%), including leakage in the gastrojejunal anastomosis in two (5.88%) patients. The conversion rate to open surgery was 2.94% (one emergency patient). There was no mortality. Excess weight loss (%, ±SD) at 3 months follow-up averaged 42.31%, ±21.54. Revisional bariatric surgery can be performed with an increased but acceptable risk, with at least short-term weight loss comparable to primary operations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Buckwalter JA, Herbst Jr CA, Khouri RK. Morbid obesity. Second gastric operations for poor weight loss. Am Surg. 1985;51:208–11.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Schwartz RW, Strodel WE, Simpson WS, et al. Gastric bypass revision: lessons learned from 920 cases. Surgery. 1988;104:806–12.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Buchwald H, Oien DM. Metabolic/bariatric surgery worldwide 2008. Obes Surg. 2009;19:1605–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Suter M, Calmes JM, Paroz A, et al. A 10-year experience with laparoscopic gastric banding for morbid obesity: high long-term complication and failure rates. Obes Surg. 2006;16:829–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tolonen P, Victorzon M, Makela J. 11-year experience with laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for morbid obesity—what happened to the first 123 patients? Obes Surg. 2008;18:251–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cadiere GB, Himpens J, Bazi M, et al. Are laparoscopic gastric bypass after gastroplasty and primary laparoscopic gastric bypass similar in terms of results? Obes Surg. 2011;21:692–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Spyropoulos C, Kehagias I, Panagiotopoulos S, et al. Revisional bariatric surgery: 13-year experience from a tertiary institution. Arch Surg. 2010;145:173–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hallowell PT, Stellato TA, Yao DA, et al. Should bariatric revisional surgery be avoided secondary to increased morbidity and mortality? Am J Surg. 2009;197:391–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jones Jr KB. Revisional bariatric surgery—potentially safe and effective. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2005;1:599–603.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Khoursheed MA, Al-Bader IA, Al-Asfar FS, et al. Revision of failed bariatric procedures to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Obes Surg. 2011;21:1157–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. te Riele WW, Sze YK, Wiezer MJ, et al. Conversion of failed laparoscopic gastric banding to gastric bypass as safe and effective as primary gastric bypass in morbidly obese patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4:735–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Owens BM, Owens ML, Hill CW. Effect of revisional bariatric surgery on weight loss and frequency of complications. Obes Surg. 1996;6:479–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sugerman HJ, Kellum Jr JM, DeMaria EJ, et al. Conversion of failed or complicated vertical banded gastroplasty to gastric bypass in morbid obesity. Am J Surg. 1996;171:263–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gagner M, Gentileschi P, de Csepel J, et al. Laparoscopic reoperative bariatric surgery: experience from 27 consecutive patients. Obes Surg. 2002;12:254–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mognol P, Chosidow D, Marmuse JP. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass after failed vertical banded gastroplasty. Obes Surg. 2007;17:1431–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee S, Carmody B, Wolfe L, et al. Effect of location and speed of diagnosis on anastomotic leak outcomes in 3828 gastric bypass cases. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007;11:708–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Van Nieuwenhove Y, Ceelen W, Van Renterghem K, et al. Conversion from band to bypass in two steps reduces the risk for anastomotic strictures. Obes Surg. 2011;21:501–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Giordano S, Salminen P, Biancari F et al: Linear stapler technique may be safer than circular in gastrojejunal anastomosis for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a meta-analysis of comparative studies. Obes Surg 2011;(in press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mikael Victorzon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Victorzon, M. Revisional Bariatric Surgery by Conversion to Gastric Bypass or Sleeve—Good Short-Term Outcomes at Higher Risks. OBES SURG 22, 29–33 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-011-0548-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-011-0548-1

Keywords

Navigation