Skip to main content
Log in

Relationship Between Knee Anthropometry and Surgical Time in Total Knee Arthroplasty in Severely and Morbidly Obese Patients: A New Prognostic Index of Surgical Difficulty

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients with severe and morbid obesity is one of the current challenges in prosthetic knee surgery. The body mass index (BMI) is used to identify patients who may present difficulties during surgery and postoperative complications. We carried out a prospective study with an initial hypothesis that BMI is not associated with tourniquet time in obese patients undergoing TKA and that some anthropometric parameters may be useful in predicting tourniquet time in severely and morbidly obese patients.

Methods

One hundred consecutive patients diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis with BMI ≥35 kg/m2 scheduled for TKA were prospectively studied. Suprapatellar, infrapatellar, and supra/infrapatellar anthropometric indexes were calculated before surgery. The tourniquet time was determined.

Results

The mean BMI was 39.81 kg/m2 (SD ± 3.75). A total of 58% of patients were classified as class III obesity (BMI 35–39.99) and 42% as class IV (BMI ≥ 40) Mean tourniquet time was 41.67 min (SD ± 9.26). There was no association between the BMI and tourniquet time. The suprapatellar index was negatively associated with tourniquet time (p < 0.038).

Discussion

The BMI is not the only parameter that should be considered in order to identify severely and morbidly obese patients who may have more surgical difficulties during TKA. Preoperative determination of the suprapatellar index helped us to classify these patients according to the morphology of the knee and predicted a longer tourniquet time and, therefore, greater surgical difficulty, in patients with a suprapatellar ratio below 1.6 in this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stickles B, Philips L, Brox WT, et al. Defining the relationship between obesity and total joint arthroplasty. Obes Res. 2001;9:219–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bourne R, Mukhi S, Zhu N, et al. Role of obesity on the risk for total hip or knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 2007;465:185–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Guss D, Bhattacharyya T. Perioperative management of the obese orthopaedic patient. J AAOS. 2006;14:425–32.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Naik G. Surgeons weighty dilemma. The Wall Street Journal. 2006;28.

  5. Fehring Th, Odum S, Griffin WL, et al. The obesity epidemic. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22 Supl 2:71–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gilliespi GN, Proteus AJ. Obesity and knee arthroplasty. The Knee. 2007;14:81–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Winarsky R, Barth P, Lotke P. Total Knee Arthroplasty in morbidly obese patients. J Bone Joint Surg. 1998;80A:1770–4.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Booth RE Jr. Total Knee arthroplasty in the obese patient: tips and quips. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17 Suppl 1:69–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rottman SJ, Dvorkin M, Gold D. Extramedullary versus intramedullary tibial alignment guides for total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2005;28:1445–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Krushell R, Fingeroth R. Primary total knee arthroplasty in morbidly obese patients. A 5-to-14-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22 Suppl 1:77–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Amin AK, Patton JT, Cook RE. Does obesity influence the clinical outcome at five years following total knee replacement for osteoarthritis? J Bone Joint Surg. 2006;88B:335–40.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Miric A, Moe LimKahn B, et al. Perioperative morbidity following total knee arthroplasty among obese patients. J Knee Surg. 2002;15:77–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Patel VP, Walsh M, Shegal B, et al. Factors associated with prolonged wound drainage after primary total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg. 2007;89A:33–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Foran JRH, Mont MA, Gracia E, et al. The outcome of total knee arthroplasty in obese patients. J Bone Joint Surg. 2004;86A:1609–15.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Foran JRH, Mont MA, Rajadhyaksha AD, et al. Total Knee arthroplasty in obese Group. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:817–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Namba RS, Paxton L, Fithian D. Obesity and perioperative morbidity in total hip and total knee arthroplasty patients. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20 Suppl 3:46–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Deshmukh RG, Hayes JH, Pinder IM. Does body weight influence outcome after total knee arthroplasty? A 1-Year Analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:315–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Spicer P, Schaper B, et al. Body mass index as a predictor of outcome in total knee replacement. Int Orthop. 2001;25:246–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Núñez M, Núñez E, del Val JL, et al. Health-related quality of life in patients with osteoarthritis after total knee replacement: factors influencing outcomes at 36 months of follow-up. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2007;15:1001–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen L, Peeters A, Magliano DJ, et al. Anthropometric measures and absolute cardiovascular risk estimates in the Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle (AusDiab) Stydy. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2007;14:740–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rama R, Apsingi S, Poovali S, et al. Timing of tourniquet release in knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg. 2007;89A:605–99.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Stürmer T, Günther KP, Brenner H. Obesity, overweight and patterns of osteoarthritis: the Ulm Osteoarthritis Study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53:307–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Powell A, Teichtahl AJ, Wluka AE, et al. Obesity a preventable risk factor for large joint osteoarthritis which may act through biomechanical factors. Br J Sports Med. 2005;39:4–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Messier SO, Gutekunst DJ, Davis C, et al. Weight loss reduces knee-joint loads in overweight and obese older adults with knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Reum. 2005;52:2026–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Focht BC, Rejeski WJ, Ambrosius WT, et al. Exercise, Self-efficacy, and mobility performance in overweight and obese older adults with knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Reum. 2005;53:659–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nevitt MC. Obesity outcomes in disease management: clinical outcomes for osteoarthritis. Obes Res. 2002:10 Suppl 1:33–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu B, Balkwill E, Cooper C, et al. Relationship of height, weight and body mass index to the risk of hip and knee replacements in middle-aged women. Rheumatology. 2007;46:861–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Abbate LM, Stevens J, Schwartz TA, et al. Anthropometric measures, body composition, body fat distribution, and knee osteoarthritis in women. Obesity. 2006;14:1274–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ding Ch, Cicuttini F, Scott F, et al. Knee structural alteration and BMI: a cross-sectional Study. Obes Res. 2005;13:350–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang Y, Wluka A, English D, et al. Body composition and knee cartilage properties in healthy, community-based adults. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007;66:1244–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. M. Lozano.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lozano, L.M., Núñez, M., Segur, J.M. et al. Relationship Between Knee Anthropometry and Surgical Time in Total Knee Arthroplasty in Severely and Morbidly Obese Patients: A New Prognostic Index of Surgical Difficulty. OBES SURG 18, 1149–1153 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-008-9481-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-008-9481-3

Keywords

Navigation