Skip to main content
Log in

Waist Circumference is Useless to Assess the Prevalence of Metabolic Abnormalities in Severely Obese Women

  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Background

The present retrospective study aims to provide additional evidence supporting the fact that waist circumference, in severe obesity, is not a good clinical marker to identify individuals with the metabolic syndrome or an altered metabolic profile.

Methods

Relationships between waist circumference and metabolic profile of pre- (n = 165) and postmenopausal (n = 43) severely obese women were compared to associations observed in pre- (n = 52) and postmenopausal (n = 35) moderately obese women.

Results

Results showed that abdominal obesity assessed by waist circumference was more highly correlated with fasting glycemia, HDL-cholesterol and the cholesterol/HDL-cholesterol ratio in moderately than in severely obese women, before menopause. After menopause, waist circumference was not a valuable predictor of metabolic abnormalities in both groups. Moreover, when waist circumference was included as a criterion of the metabolic syndrome (as defined by the NCEP ATP III guidelines) in severely obese women, the prevalence of this metabolic condition was over-estimated by 72%.

Conclusion

These results emphasize the uselessness of waist circumference to assess the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome or an altered metabolic profile in severely obese women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Liese AD, Mayer-Davis EJ, Haffner SM. Development of the multiple metabolic syndrome: an epidemiologic perspective. Epidemiol Rev 1998; 20: 157–72.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lemieux I, Pascot A, Couillard C et al. Hypertriglyceridemic waist: A marker of the atherogenic metabolic triad (hyperinsulinemia; hyperapolipoprotein B; small, dense LDL) in men? Circulation 2000; 102: 179–84.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Expert panel on detection, evaluation and treatment of high blood pressure. Executive Summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA 2001; 285: 2486–97.

  4. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute. Clinical Guidelines on the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults: The Evidence Report. Obes Res 1998; 6: 51S–210S.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Scarsella C, Alméras N, Mauriège P et al. Prevalence of metabolic alterations predictive of cardiovascular disease risk in the Quebec population. Can J Cardiol 2003; 19: 51–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Drapeau V, Lemieux I, Richard D et al. Metabolic profile in severely obese women is less deteriorated than expected when compared to moderately obese women. Obes Surg 2006; 16: 501–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Daniels SR et al. Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Scientific Statement. Circulation 2005; 112: 2735–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lemieux I, Drapeau V, Richard D et al. Waist girth does not predict metabolic complications in severely obese men. Diabetes Care 2006; 29: 1417–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pouliot MC, Després J-P, Nadeau A et al. Visceral obesity in men. Associations with glucose tolerance, plasma insulin, and lipoprotein levels. Diabetes 1992; 41: 826–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Després J-P, Nadeau A, Tremblay A et al. Role of deep abdominal fat in the association between regional adipose tissue distribution and glucose tolerance in obese women. Diabetes 1989; 12: 304–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Matsuzawa Y. Pathophysiology and molecular mechanisms of visceral fat syndrome: the Japanese experience. Diabetes Metab Rev 1997; 13: 3–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Park YW, Zhu S, Palaniappan L et al. The metabolic syndrome: prevalence and associated risk factor findings in the US population from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994. Arch Intern Med 2003; 163: 427–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mokdad AH, Ford ES, Bowman BA et al. Prevalence of obesity, diabetes, and obesity-related health risk factors, 2001. JAMA 2003; 289: 76–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pascale Mauriège.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Drapeau, V., Lemieux, I., Richard, D. et al. Waist Circumference is Useless to Assess the Prevalence of Metabolic Abnormalities in Severely Obese Women. OBES SURG 17, 905–909 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-007-9168-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-007-9168-1

Key words

Navigation