Background
The present retrospective study aims to provide additional evidence supporting the fact that waist circumference, in severe obesity, is not a good clinical marker to identify individuals with the metabolic syndrome or an altered metabolic profile.
Methods
Relationships between waist circumference and metabolic profile of pre- (n = 165) and postmenopausal (n = 43) severely obese women were compared to associations observed in pre- (n = 52) and postmenopausal (n = 35) moderately obese women.
Results
Results showed that abdominal obesity assessed by waist circumference was more highly correlated with fasting glycemia, HDL-cholesterol and the cholesterol/HDL-cholesterol ratio in moderately than in severely obese women, before menopause. After menopause, waist circumference was not a valuable predictor of metabolic abnormalities in both groups. Moreover, when waist circumference was included as a criterion of the metabolic syndrome (as defined by the NCEP ATP III guidelines) in severely obese women, the prevalence of this metabolic condition was over-estimated by 72%.
Conclusion
These results emphasize the uselessness of waist circumference to assess the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome or an altered metabolic profile in severely obese women.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Liese AD, Mayer-Davis EJ, Haffner SM. Development of the multiple metabolic syndrome: an epidemiologic perspective. Epidemiol Rev 1998; 20: 157–72.
Lemieux I, Pascot A, Couillard C et al. Hypertriglyceridemic waist: A marker of the atherogenic metabolic triad (hyperinsulinemia; hyperapolipoprotein B; small, dense LDL) in men? Circulation 2000; 102: 179–84.
Expert panel on detection, evaluation and treatment of high blood pressure. Executive Summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA 2001; 285: 2486–97.
National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute. Clinical Guidelines on the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults: The Evidence Report. Obes Res 1998; 6: 51S–210S.
Scarsella C, Alméras N, Mauriège P et al. Prevalence of metabolic alterations predictive of cardiovascular disease risk in the Quebec population. Can J Cardiol 2003; 19: 51–7.
Drapeau V, Lemieux I, Richard D et al. Metabolic profile in severely obese women is less deteriorated than expected when compared to moderately obese women. Obes Surg 2006; 16: 501–9.
Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Daniels SR et al. Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Scientific Statement. Circulation 2005; 112: 2735–52.
Lemieux I, Drapeau V, Richard D et al. Waist girth does not predict metabolic complications in severely obese men. Diabetes Care 2006; 29: 1417–9.
Pouliot MC, Després J-P, Nadeau A et al. Visceral obesity in men. Associations with glucose tolerance, plasma insulin, and lipoprotein levels. Diabetes 1992; 41: 826–34.
Després J-P, Nadeau A, Tremblay A et al. Role of deep abdominal fat in the association between regional adipose tissue distribution and glucose tolerance in obese women. Diabetes 1989; 12: 304–9.
Matsuzawa Y. Pathophysiology and molecular mechanisms of visceral fat syndrome: the Japanese experience. Diabetes Metab Rev 1997; 13: 3–13.
Park YW, Zhu S, Palaniappan L et al. The metabolic syndrome: prevalence and associated risk factor findings in the US population from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994. Arch Intern Med 2003; 163: 427–36.
Mokdad AH, Ford ES, Bowman BA et al. Prevalence of obesity, diabetes, and obesity-related health risk factors, 2001. JAMA 2003; 289: 76–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Drapeau, V., Lemieux, I., Richard, D. et al. Waist Circumference is Useless to Assess the Prevalence of Metabolic Abnormalities in Severely Obese Women. OBES SURG 17, 905–909 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-007-9168-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-007-9168-1