Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Positive Psychological Impact of Bariatric Surgery

  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Background

Psychological impact of bariatric surgery has been described mostly in terms of reduction of psychopathology. This exploratory study examines the impact of bariatric surgery in terms of positive psychological growth and development.

Methods

57 patients who underwent LAGB were recruited to this study; 31 patients (54.4%) completed a questionnaire battery 1 year or more following surgery. Positive impact was assessed using the posttraumatic growth questionnaire. Mental and physical health were assessed using the SF-36. Family support was assessed using the perceived family support questionnaire and weight loss measure was assessed using measured weight differences prior to and 1 year after surgery.

Results

Positive impact was apparent in all dimensions including greater appreciation of life, increased sense of personal strength and improvement in relating to others. Positive impact appears to be independent of physical and mental health as well as of family social support.

Conclusion

Positive impact of bariatric surgery is a substantial outcome and should be examined further. Positive impact of bariatric surgery should be taken into account as a therapeutic tool in positive oriented psychological interventions following bariatric surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fabricatore AN, Wadden TA, Sarwer DB et al. Health-related quality of life and symptoms of depression in extremely obese persons seeking bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 2005; 15: 304–.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nguyen N, Varela EJ, Nguyen T et al. Quality of life assessment in the morbidly obese. Obes Surg 2006; 16: 531–.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Van Hout GC, Boekestein P, Fortuin FA et al. Psychosocial functioning following bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 2006; 16: 787–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Buddeberg-Fischer B, Klaghofer R, Sigrist S et al. Impact of psychosocial stress and symptoms on indication for bariatric surgery and outcome in morbidly obese patients. Obes Surg 2004; 14: 361–.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wee CC, Jones DB, Davis RB et al. Understanding patients’ value of weight loss and expectations for bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 2006; 16: 496–00.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edn. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.

  7. Siegel K, Schrimshaw EW. Perceiving benefits in adversity: stress-related growth in women living with HIV/AIDS. Soc Sci Med 2000; 51: 1543–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mann S, Ostroff J, Winkel G et al. Posttraumatic growth after breast cancer: patient, partner, and couple perspectives. Psychosom Med 2004; 66: 442–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Weiss T. Correlates of posttraumatic growth in husbands of breast cancer survivors. Psychooncology 2004; 13: 260–.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Waysman M, Schwarzwald J, Solomon Z. Hardiness: An examination of its relationship with positive and negative long term changes following trauma. J Trauma Stress 2001; 14: 531–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Linley PA, Joseph S. Positive change following trauma and adversity: a review. J Trauma Stress 2004; 17: 11–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mamplekou E, Komesidou V, Bissias CH et al. Psychological condition and quality of life in patients with morbid obesity before and after surgical weight loss. Obes Surg 2005; 15: 1177–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Seligman ME, Steen TA, Park N et al. Positive psychology progress: Empirical validation of interventions. Am Psychologist 2005; 60: 410–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Van Hout GC, Varschure SK, Van Heck GL. Psychosocial predictors of success following bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 2005; 15: 4: 552–0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Vishne TH, Ramadan E, Alper D et al. Long-term follow-up and factors influencing success of silastic ring vertical gastroplasty. Dig Surg 2004; 21: 134–0; discussion 140–. Epub 2004 Mar 23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Ass; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Uitenbroek DG. 1997. Binomial. SISA –Simple Interactive Statistical Analysis. http://home.clara.net/sisa/correl.htm

  18. Thaler K, Dinnewitzer A, Oberwalder M et al. Assessment of long-term quality of life after laparoscopic and open surgery for Crohn’s disease. Colorectal Dis 2005; 7: 375–1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Brunaud L, Bresler L, Zarnegar R et al. Does robotic adrenalectomy improve patient quality of life when compared to laparoscopic adrenalectomy? World J Surg 2004; 28: 1180–.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tedeschi RG, Calhoun LG. The Posttraumatic Growth Inventory: Measuring the positive legacy of trauma. J Trauma Stress 1996; 9: 455–1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Laufer A, Solomon Z. Posttraumatic symptoms and posttraumatic growth among Israeli youth exposed to terror incidents. J Social Clin Psychology 2006; 25: 429–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30: 473–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Procidano ME, Heller K. Measures at perceived social support from friends and from family. Three validation studies. Am J Comm Psychology 1983; 11: 1–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Thornton AA, Perez MA. Posttraumatic growth in prostate cancer survivors and their partners. Psychooncology 2006; 15: 285–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ahroni JH, Montgomery KF, Watkins BM. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: weight loss, co-morbidities, medication usage and quality of life at one year. Obes Surg 2005; 15: 641–.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Baider L, Ever-Hadani P, Goldzweig G et al. Is perceived family support a relevant variable in psychological distress? A sample of prostate and breast cancer couples. J Psychosom Res 2003; 55: 453–0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bocchieri LE, Meana M, Barry L et al. Perceived psychosocial outcomes of gastric bypass surgery: A qualitative study. Obes Surg 2002; 12: 781–.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Park CL, Cohen LH, Murch R. Assessment and prediction of stress-related growth. J Pers 1996; 64: 1: 71–05.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Armeli S, Gunthert, KC, Cohen LH. Stressor appraisals, positive impact and post-event outcomes: The dimensionality and antecedents of stress-related growth. J Social Clin Psychology 2001; 20: 366–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Cordova MJ, Cunningham LC, Carlson CR et al. Posttraumatic growth following breast cancer: A controlled comparison study. Health Psychology 2001; 20: 176–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Janoff-Bulman R. Shattered Assumptions: Towards a New Psychology of Trauma. New York: Free Press; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Evers AW, Kraaimaat FW, van Lankvels W et al. Beyond unfavorable thinking: the illness cognition questionnaire for chronic diseases. J Consult Clin Psychol 2001; 69: 1026–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Tennen H, Affleck G, Urrows S et al. Perceiving control, construing benefits, and daily processes in rheumatoid arthritis. Can J Behav Sci 1992; 24: 186–03.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Davis CG, Nolen-Haeksema S, Larson J. Making sense of loss and benefiting from the experience: two construals of meaning. J Pers Soc Psychol 1998; 75: 2: 561–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Fromm K, Andrykowski MA, Hunt J. Positive and negative psychosocial sequelae of bone marrow transplantation: Implications for quality of life assessment. J Behav Med 1996; 19: 221–0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Joseph S, Williams R, Yule W. Changes in outlook following disaster: The preliminary development of a measure to assess positive and negative responses. J Traum Stress 1993; 6: 271–.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Marcus JD, Elkins GR. Development of a model for a structured support group for patients following bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 2004; 14: 103–.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hershberger PJ. Prescribing happiness: positive psychology and family medicine. Fam Med 2005; 37: 630–.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shimon Shiri MA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shiri, S., Gurevich, T., Feintuch, U. et al. Positive Psychological Impact of Bariatric Surgery. OBES SURG 17, 663–668 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-007-9111-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-007-9111-5

Key words

Navigation