Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Spatial modeling of the carbon stock of forest trees in Heilongjiang Province, China

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Forestry Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Heilongjiang province is the largest forest zone in China and the forest coverage rate is 46%. Forests of Heilongjiang province play an important role in the forest ecosystem of China. In this study we investigated the spatial distribution of forest carbon storage in Heilongjiang province using 3083 plots sampled in 2010. We attempted to fit two global models, ordinary least squares model (OLS), linear mixed model (LMM), and a local model, geographically weighted regression model (GWR), to the relationship between forest carbon content and stand, environment, and climate factors. Five predictors significantly affected forest carbon storage and spatial distribution, viz. average diameter of stand (DBH), number of trees per hectare (TPH), elevation (Elev), slope (Slope) and the product of precipitation and temperature (Rain_Temp). The GWR model outperformed the two global models in both model fitting and prediction because it successfully reduced both spatial autocorrelation and heterogeneity in model residuals. More importantly, the GWR model provided localized model coefficients for each location in the study area, which allowed us to evaluate the influences of local stand conditions and topographic features on tree and stand growth, and forest carbon stock. It also helped us to better understand the impacts of silvicultural and management activities on the amount and changes of forest carbon storage across the province. The detailed information can be readily incorporated with the mapping ability of GIS software to provide excellent tools for assessing the distribution and dynamics of the forest-carbon stock in the next few years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anselin L, Bera AK. 1998. Spatial dependence in linear regression models with an introduction to spatial econometrics. Statistics Textbooks and Monographs, 155: 237–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baral A, Guha GS. 2004. Trees for carbon sequestration or fossil fuel substitution: the issue of cost vs. carbon benefit. Biomass and Bioenergy, 27: 41–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bronson DR, Gower ST, Tanner M, Linder S, Van Herk I. 2008. Response of soil surface CO2 flux in a boreal forest to ecosystem warming. Global Change Biology, 14: 856–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown S. 2002. Measuring carbon in forests: current status and future challenges. Environmental Pollution, 116:363–372.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brunsdon C, Fotheringham AS, Charlton M. 1999. Some notes on parametric significance tests for geographically weighted regression. Journal of Regional Science, 39:497–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunsdon C, Fotheringham AS, Charlton M. 2002. Geographically weighted summary statistics — A framework for localized exploratory data analysis. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 26:501–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunsdon C, Fotheringham AS, Charlton ME. 1996. Geographically weighted regression: A method for exploring spatial nonstationarity. Geographical Analysis, 28: 281–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charlton M, Fotheringham S, Brunsdon C. 2009. Geographically weighted regression. White paper. National Centre for Geocomputation. National University of Ireland Maynooth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi GQ. 2010. The impacts of highway expansion on population change: An integrated spatial approach. Rural Sociology, 75:58–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi W, Qian XY. 2009. The role of education in regional innovation activities and economic growth: spatial evidence from China. Available at: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/15779

    Google Scholar 

  • Daoyi G, Peijun S. 2004. Inter-annual changes in Eurasian continent NDVI and its sensitivity to the large-scale climate variations in the last 20 years. Acta Botanica Siniea, 46:186–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du HQ, Zhou GM, Fan WY, Ge HL, Xu XJ, Shi YJ, Fan WL. 2010. Spatial heterogeneity and carbon contribution of aboveground biomass of moso bamboo by using geostatistical theory. Plant Ecology, 207:131–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Echalar F, Gaudichet A, Cachier H, Artaxo P. 1995. Aerosol emissions by tropical forest and savanna biomass burning: Characteristic trace elements and fluxes. Geophysical Research Letters, 22: 3039–3042.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Espa G, Arbia G, Giuliani D. 2013. Conditional versus unconditional industrial agglomeration: disentangling spatial dependence and spatial heterogeneity in the analysis of ICT firms’ distribution in Milan. Journal of Geographical Systems, 15: 31–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahey TJ, Woodbury PB, Battles JJ, Goodale CL, Hamburg SP, Ollinger SV, Woodall CW. 2009. Forest carbon storage: ecology, management, and policy. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 8: 245–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falkowski P, Scholes RJ, Boyle EEA, Canadell J, Canfield D, Elser J, Gruber N, Hibbard K, Högberg P, Linder S. 2000. The global carbon cycle: A test of our knowledge of earth as a system. Science, 290: 291–296.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fang JY, Chen AP, Peng CH, Zhao SQ, Ci LJ. 2001. Changes in forest biomass carbon storage in China between 1949 and 1998. Science, 292: 2320–2322.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fotheringham AS, Brunsdon C, Charlton M. 2002. Geographically weighted regression: the analysis of spatially varying relationships. Wiley and Sons, p.269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fotheringham AS, Charlton ME, Brunsdon C. 2001. Spatial variations in school performance: A local analysis using geographically weighted regression. Geographical and Environmental Modeling, 5: 43–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granier A, Ceschia E, Damesin C, Dufrêne E, Epron D, Gross P, Lebaube S, Le DV, Le GN, Lemoine D. 2000. The carbon balance of a young beech forest. Functional Ecology, 14: 312–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo L, Ma Z, and Zhang L. 2008. Comparison of bandwidth selection in application of geographically weighted regression: a case study. Canadian Journal of Forestry Research, 38: 2526–2534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazlett PW, Gordon AM, Sibley PK, Buttle JM. 2005. Stand carbon stocks and soil carbon and nitrogen storage for riparian and upland forests of boreal lakes in northeastern Ontario. Forest Ecology and Management, 219: 56–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heath LS, Smith JE. 2000. An assessment of uncertainty in forest carbon budget projections. Environmental Science and Policy, 3:73–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • HLJFOREST. 2014. http://www.hljforest.gov.cn/

  • Houoatow RA. 1997. Terrestrial carbon storage: global lessons for Amazonian research. Ciencia e Cultura Sao Paulo, 49: 58–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston K, Ver JM, Krivoruchko K, Lucas N. 2001. Using ArcGIS geostatistical analyst. Esri Redlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurz WA, Apps MJ. 1999. A 70-year retrospective analysis of carbon fluxes in the Canadian forest sector. Ecology Applications, 9: 526–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurz WA, Stinson G, Rampley GJ, Dymond CC, Neilson ET. 2008. Risk of natural disturbances makes future contribution of Canada’s forests to the global carbon cycle highly uncertain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105: 1551–1555.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Law BE, Thornton PE, Irvine J, Anthoni PM, Van TS. 2001. Carbon storage and fluxes in ponderosa pine forests at different developmental stages. Global Change Biology, 7: 755–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindesay JA, Andreae MO, Goldammer JG, Harris G, Annegarn HJ, Garstang M, Scholes RJ, Van BW. 1996. International geosphere-biosphere programme/international global atmospheric chemistry SAFARI-92 field experiment: Background and overview. Journal of Geophysical Research, 101: 23521–23523, 530.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Littell RC, Milliken WW, Stroup RD, Wolfinger A. 2006. SAS for mixed models. 2 nd Ed. Cary, USA: SAS Press, p.441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu J, Zhang L. 2011. Modeling and prediction of tree height-diameter relationships using spatial autoregressive models. Forest Science, 57: 252–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu J, Zhang L. 2012. Geographically local linear mixed models for tree height-diameter relationship. Forest Science, 58:75–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma Z, Zuckerberg B, Porter WF, Zhang L. 2011. Use of localized descriptive statistics for exploring the spatial pattern changes of bird species richness at multiple scales. Applied Geography, 32: 185–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myeong S, Nowak DJ, Duggin MJ. 2006. A temporal analysis of urban forest carbon storage using remote sensing. Remote Sensing and Environment, 101: 277–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neilson ET, MacLean DA, Meng F, Arp PA. 2007. Spatial distribution of carbon in natural and managed stands in an industrial forest in New Brunswick, Canada. Forest Ecology and Management, 253: 148–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson R, Krabill W, Tonelli J. 1988. Estimating forest biomass and volume using airborne laser data. Remote Sensing and Environment, 24: 247–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips DL, Brown SL, Schroeder PE, Birdsey RA. 2000. Toward error analysis of large — scale forest carbon budgets. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 9: 305–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickett S, Cadenasso ML. 1995. Landscape ecology: spatial heterogeneity in ecological systems. Science, 269: 331–334.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sales MH, Souza CM, Kyriakidis PC, Roberts DA, Vidal E. 2007. Improving spatial distribution estimation of forest biomass with geostatistics: A case study for Rondônia, Brazil. Ecological Modeling, 205: 221–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute, Inc. 2011. SAS/STAT Users’ guide. Version 9.3. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi H, Zhang L. 2003. Local analysis of tree competition and growth. Forest Science, 49: 938–955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi H, Zhang L, Liu J. 2006. A new spatial-attribute weighting function for geographically weighted regression. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 36: 996–1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith JE, Heath LS, Skog KE, Birdsey RA. 2006. Methods for calculating forest ecosystem and harvested carbon with standard estimates for forest types of the United States. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sohngen B, Mendelsohn R. 2003. An optimal control model of forest carbon sequestration. American J. Agricultural Economics, 85: 448–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang SZ, Zhang HR, Xu H. 2000. Study on establish and estimate method of compatible biomass model. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 36: 19–27. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentini R, Matteucci G, Dolman AJ, Schulze E, Rebmann C, Moors EJ, Granier A, Gross P, Jensen NO, Pilegaard K. 2000. Respiration as the main determinant of carbon balance in European forests. Nature, 404: 861–865.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wofsy SC, Harriss RC. 2002. The North American Carbon Program (NACP). Report of the NACP Committee of the US Interagency Carbon Cycle Science Program. US Global Change Research Program, Washington, DC 59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Bi H, Cheng P, Davis CJ. 2004. Modeling spatial variation in tree diameter-height relationships. Forest Ecology and Management, 189: 317–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Gove JH. 2005. Spatial assessment of model errors from four regression techniques. Forest Science, 51:334–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Gove JH, Heath L. 2005. Spatial residual analysis of six modeling techniques. Ecological Modeling, 186: 154–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Ma Z, Guo L. 2009. An evaluation of spatial autocorrelation and heterogeneity in the residuals of six regression models. Forest Science, 55: 533–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Shi H. 2004. Local modeling of tree growth by geographically weighted regression. Forest Science, 50: 225–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhen Z, Li FR, Liu ZG, Liu C, Zhao YL, Ma ZH, Zhang L. 2013. Geographically local modeling of occurrence, count, and volume of downwood in Northeast China. Applied Geography, 37: 114–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou XJ, Wang FL, Wu YY, Na JH, Pan HS, Wang Y. 2013. Analysis of temperature change characteristics of Heilongjiang Province, northeast China and whole country in recent 60 years. Journal of Natural Disasters, 22(2):124–129. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Forest Management, School of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, 150040, P.R. China

    Chang Liu, Fengri Li & Xingji Jin

  2. Department of Forest and Natural Resources Management, State University of New York, College of Environmental Science and Forestry (SUNY-ESF), One Forestry Drive, Syracuse, NY, 13210, USA

    Lianjun Zhang

Authors
  1. Chang Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lianjun Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fengri Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xingji Jin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fengri Li.

Additional information

Project funding: This research was financially supported by the Scientific Research Funds for Forestry Public Welfare of China (Granted No. 201004026) and the Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (IRT1054).

Corresponding editor: Chai Ruihai

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, C., Zhang, L., Li, F. et al. Spatial modeling of the carbon stock of forest trees in Heilongjiang Province, China. Journal of Forestry Research 25, 269–280 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-014-0458-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-014-0458-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation