Skip to main content
Log in

Quantification by allometric equations of carbon sequestered by Tectona grandis in different agroforestry systems

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Forestry Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Non destructive methods for quantification of carbon sequestration in tropical trees are inadequately developed. We described a standardized method for estimating carbon stock in teak (Tectona grandis Linn. F.). We developed linear allometric equations using girth at breast height (GBH), height and age to quantify above ground biomass (AGB). We used AGB to estimate carbon stock for teak trees of different age groups (1.5, 3.5, 7.5, 13.5, 18.5 and 23.5 years). The regression equation with GBH, y = 3.174x − 21.27, r 2=0.898 (p <0.01), was found precise and convenient due to the difficulty in determination of height and age in dense natural forests of teak. The equation was evaluated in teak agroforestry systems that included Triticum aestivum (wheat), Cicer arietinum (gram), Withania somnifera (ashwagandha), Avena fatua (wild oat) and Hordeum vulgare (barley) as agricultural crops established at Tropical Forest Research Institute, Jabalpur, M.P. (India). The annual carbon stock gain in teak in different agroforestry systems was in the order: teak-barley (60.47%) > teak-wheat (56.92%) > teak-wild oat (54.94%) > teak-gram (37.15%) > teak-ashwagandha (11.86%). The results from GBH-based regression equations provided satisfactory estimates of carbon stock in tropical trees.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Basuki TM, Van Laake PE, Skidmore AK, Hussin YA. 2009. Allometric equations for estimating the above ground biomass in tropical lowland Dipterocarp forests. Forest Ecology & Management, 257(8): 1684–1694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black CR, Ong CK. 2000. Utilization of light and water in tropical agriculture. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 104(1): 25–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown S, Gillespie A, Lugo AE. 1989. Biomass estimation methods for tropical forests with applications to forest inventory data. Forest Science, 35(4): 881–902.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown S. 1997. Estimating biomass and biomass change of tropical forest: a primer. Rome: FAO — Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Champion HG, Seth SK. 1968. A revised survey of the forest types of India. Delhi: Govt. of India Press, p. 404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chave J, Andalo C, Brown S, Cairns MA, Chambers JQ, Eamus D, Folster H, Fromard F, Higuchi N, Kira T, Lescure JP, Nelson BW, Ogawa H, Puig H, Riera B, Yamakura T. 2005. Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests. Oecologia, 145(1): 87–99.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chave J, Condit R, Aguilar S, Hernandez A, Lao S, Perez R. 2004. Error propagation and scaling for tropical forest biomass estimates. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B — Biological Sciences, 359(1443): 409–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark DA, Brown S, Kicklighter D, Chambers JQ, Thomlinson JR, Ni J. 2001. Measuring net primary production in forests: concepts and field methods. Ecological Applications, 11(2): 356–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedegart T. 1975. In: Burley J, Styles BT (eds). Breeding systems, variation and genetic improvement of teak (Tectona grandis Linn. F.) Tropical trees variation, breeding and conservation. New York: Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaul M, Mohren GMJ, Dadhwal VK. 2010.Carbon storage and sequestration potential of selected tree species in India. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 15(5): 489–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ketterings QM, Coe R, Noordwijk MV, Ambagau Y, Palm CA. 2001. Reducing uncertainty in the use of allometric biomass equation for predicting above-ground tree biomass in mixed secondary forest. Forest Ecology & Management, 146: 199–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noordwijk MV, Lusiana B. 2000. WaNuLCAS version 2.0: Background on a model of water, nutrient and light capture in agroforestry systems. Bogor, Indonesia: The World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), p. 186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips OL, Malhi Y, Vinceti B, Baker T, Lewis SL, Higuchi N, Laurance WF, Nunez VP, Vasquez MR, Laurance SG, Ferreira LV, Stern MM, Brown S, Grace J. 2002. Changes in the biomass of tropical forests: Evaluating potential biases. Ecological Applications, 12: 576–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russel RS. 1977. Plant root systems: Their function and interaction with the soil. Maidenhead, Berks, United Kingdom: McGraw Hill Book Company (UK) Limited, pp. 30–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troup RS. 1921. The silviculture of Indian trees. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 697–798.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change). 2008. Report of the conference of the parties on its thirteenth session, held in Bali from 3 to 15 December 2007. Addendum, Part 2. Document FCCC/CP/2007/6/Add. 1. Bonn Germany: UNFCCC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams MS, Schreuder HT. 2000. Guidelines for choosing volume equations in the presence of measurement error in height. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 30(2): 306–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Avinash Jain.

Additional information

Fund project: This study was financially supported by Indian Council of Forestry Research and Education, Dehradun, India.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jain, A., Ansari, S.A. Quantification by allometric equations of carbon sequestered by Tectona grandis in different agroforestry systems. Journal of Forestry Research 24, 699–702 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-013-0406-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-013-0406-1

Keywords

Navigation