Abstract
Boreal forests play an important role in global environment systems. Understanding boreal forest ecosystem structure and function requires accurate monitoring and estimating of forest canopy and biomass. We used partial least square regression (PLSR) models to relate forest parameters, i.e. canopy closure density and above ground tree biomass, to Landsat ETM+ data. The established models were optimized according to the variable importance for projection (VIP) criterion and the bootstrap method, and their performance was compared using several statistical indices. All variables selected by the VIP criterion passed the bootstrap test (p<0.05). The simplified models without insignificant variables (VIP <1) performed as well as the full model but with less computation time. The relative root mean square error (RMSE%) was 29% for canopy closure density, and 58% for above-ground tree biomass. We conclude that PLSR can be an effective method for estimating canopy closure density and above-ground biomass.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Carreiras JMB, Pereira JMC, Pereira JS. 2006. Estimation of tree canopy cover in evergreen oak woodlands using remote sensing. Forest Ecology and Management, 223: 45–53.
Cho M, Skidmore A., Cors I F, Van Wieren S, Sobhan I. 2007. Estimation of green grass/herb biomass from airborne hyperspectral imagery using spectral indices and partial least squares regression. International Journal of Applied Earth Observations and Geoinformation, 9: 414–424.
Cohen WB, Maiersperger TK, Gower ST, Turner DP. 2003. An improved strategy for regression of biophysical variables and Landsat ETM+ data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 84: 561–571.
Crist E, Cicone R. 1984. A physically-based transformation of thematic mapper data-the TM tasseled cap. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 22: 256–263.
Fang JY, Liu GH, Xu SL. 1996. Biomass and net production of forest vegetation in China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 16: 497–508. (In Chinese with English abstract).
Farifteh J, Van Der Meer F, Atzberger C, Carranza EJM. 2007. Quantitative analysis of salt-affected soil reflectance spectra: A comparison of two adaptive methods (PLSR and ANN). Remote Sensing of Environment, 110: 59–78.
Fiala ACS, Garman SL, GRAY AN. 2006. Comparison of five canopy cover estimation techniques in the western Oregon Cascades. Forest Ecology and Management, 232: 188–197.
Hansen PM, Schjoerring JK. 2003. Reflectance measurement of canopy biomass and nitrogen status in wheat crops using normalized difference vegetation indices and partial least squares regression. Remote Sensing of Environment, 86: 542–553.
Hernandez-stefanoni J, Ponce-hernandez R. 2006. Mapping the spatial variability of plant diversity in a tropical forest: comparison of spatial interpolation methods. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 117: 307–334.
Jakubauskas ME, PRICE KP. 1997. Empirical relationships between structural and spectral factors of Yellowstone lodgepole pine forests. Photogrammetric engineering and remote sensing, 63: 1375–1381.
Joshi C, De Leeuw J, Skidmore AK, Van Duren IC, Van Oosten H. 2006. Remotely sensed estimation of forest canopy density: A comparison of the performance of four methods. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 8: 84–95.
Lemay V, Maedel J, Coops NC. 2008. Estimating stand structural details using nearest neighbor analyses to link ground data, forest cover maps, and Landsat imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment, 112: 2578–2591.
Næsset E, Bollandsas OM, Gobakken T. 2005. Comparing regression methods in estimation of biophysical properties of forest stands from two different inventories using laser scanner data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 94: 541–553.
Price K, Guo X, Stiles J. 2002. Optimal Landsat TM band combinations and vegetation indices for discrimination of six grassland types in eastern Kansas. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 23: 5031–5042.
Reese H, Nilsson M, Sandström P, Olsson H. 2002. Applications using estimates of forest parameters derived from satellite and forest inventory data. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 37: 37–55.
Serneels S, Van Espen P. 2005. Bootstrap confidence intervals for trilinear partial least squares regression. Analytica Chimica Acta, 544: 153–158.
Wang HW, Wu ZB, Meng J (Eds.). 2006. Partial Least-Squares Regression — Linear and Nonlinear Methods. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press. pp.35–123 (In Chinese).
WU FZ (Ed.). 1996. Forest Mensuration. Beijing: Chinese Forestry Publishing House, pp.174–202 (In Chinese).
Wulder M, Han T, White J, Sweda T, Tsuzuki H. 2007. Integrating profiling LIDAR with Landsat data for regional boreal forest canopy attribute estimation and change characterization. Remote Sensing of Environment, 110: 123–137.
Zhao XW, Li CG (Eds.). 2001. Quantitative Estimation of Forest Resource Based on “3S”: Theory, Method Application and Software. Beijing: China Science and Technology Press, pp. 12–46 (In Chinese).
Zheng D, Rademacher J, Chen J, Crow T, Bresee M, Le Moine J, Ryu SR. 2004. Estimating aboveground biomass using Landsat 7 ETM+ data across a managed landscape in northern Wisconsin, USA. Remote Sensing of Environment, 93: 402–411.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Foundation project: This study was supported by the 948 Program of the State Forestry Administration (2009-4-43) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 30870420).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lei, Cl., Ju, Cy., Cai, Tj. et al. Estimating canopy closure density and above-ground tree biomass using partial least square methods in Chinese boreal forests. Journal of Forestry Research 23, 191–196 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-012-0232-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-012-0232-x