Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparative study of some soil properties in forested and deforested areas in Cox’s Bazar and Rangamati Districts, Bangladesh

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Forestry Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study dealt with the assessment of impact of deforestation on soil through a comparative analysis of soil physicochemical properties of natural forest and deforested areas. Soil samples from three depths (top, middle and bottom) under natural forest and nearby deforested areas were collected to investigate soil properties. Forest soils show no significant change in particle size distribution. Bulk density of forested soils shows the significant differences in top and middle layers. Soil pH in top and middle soil, organic matter in top soil and available phosphorus in middle soil of the forest site are found to be significantly higher than that of the deforested soils. Forest soils also have significantly higher level of exchangeable Ca2+, K+ in top and middle soil and Mg2+ at all depth than those of deforested site. Exchangeable Na+ and cation exchange capacity (CEC) are observed unchanged in both sites. The results suggest that change in soil properties was more obvious in surface and sub surface portions of both areas. The study shows that deterioration of physicochemical properties occurred due to deforestation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams PW, Boyle JR. 1982. Soil fertility changes following clearcut and whole tree harvesting and burning in central Michigan. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 46: 638–640.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Adejuwon JO, Ekanade O. 1987. Edaphic component of the environment degradation resulting from the replacement of tropical rain forest by field and tree crops in SW Nigeria. International Tree Crops Journal, 4: 269–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agboola AA. 1994. A recipe for continuous arable crop production in the forest zone of western Nigeria. In: Sanchez PA, Van Houten H (eds), Alternative to slash-and-burn agriculture. Symposium ID-6. 15th International Soil Science Congress, Mexico, pp.107–120

  • Allen JC. 1985. Soil response to forest clearing in the United States and the tropics: Geological and biological factors. Biotropica, 17: 15–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amin R, Akonda AW, Neyamat H. 2002. National assessment of forestry restoration policy and practices in South Asia: Bangladesh. IUCN/WWF, 50pp.

  • Anonymous. 1992. Forestry Master Plan-Main Plan, ADB (TA No.1355-Ban), UNDP/FAO BGD 88/025, 162pp.

  • Araki S. 1992. The role of miombo woodland ecosystem in chitemene shifting cultivation in northern Zambia. Japan InforMAB, 11: 8–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Araujo QR, Comerford NB, Ogram AV, Al-Agely A, Filho LP, Santos JG. 2005. Soil carbon and physical property changes in Brazilian Coastal Tableland soils with land use following deforestation. Agroforestry Systems, 63(2): 193–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black CA. 1965. Methods of Soil Analysis. American Society of Agronomy, Inc. Publisher, Madison, Wisconsin, U.S.A. pp.894–895.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake GR. 1965. Bulk density. In: Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1 (eds. C.A. Black, D.D. Evans, J.L. White. I.E. Ensminger and F.E. Clark). American Society of Agronomy, Inc. Publisher, Madison, Wisconsin, U.S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswas SR, Choudhury JK. 2007. Forests and forest management practices in Bangladesh: the question of sustainability. International Forestry Review, 9(2): 627–640 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle JR. 1975. Whole tree harvesting impact on site quality. Paper presenting at the Tappi Annual Meeting, 24–26 February, New York.

  • Brammer H. 1971. Bangladesh Land Resources Technical Report-3.AGL: SF,Pak-6, FAO, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chidumayo EN. 1989. Land use, deforestation and reforestation in the Zambian copperbelt. Land Degradation and Rehabilitation, 1: 209–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chidumayo EN, Kwibisa L. 2003. Effects of deforestation on grass biomass and soil nutrient status in miombo woodland, Zambia. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 96: 97–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury MSH, Biswas S, Haque SMS, Muhammed N, Koike M. 2007. Comparative analysis of some selected macronutrients of soil orange orchard and degraded forests in Chittagong Hill Tracts, Bangladesh. Journal of Forest Research, 18(1): 27–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado CR, Barcelo G, Parraga J. 1985. Effects of deforestation on the soils of the Antequera region of Malaga, Spain. III. Analysis and evaluation. Ann Edafol Agrobiol, 44: 1015–1027.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO. 2001. State of the world’s forests 2001, FAO. Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO. 2000. Forest Resources of Bangladesh Country Report, Rome 2000. The Forest Resources Assessment Programme; Originated by: Forestry Department. Available at http://www.fao.org/docrep/007/ad104e/AD104E04.htm#P393_24960

  • Hajabbasi MA, Jalalian A, Karimzadeh HR. 1997. Deforestation effect on physical and chemical properties, Lordegan, Iran. Plant and Soil, 190: 301–308.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrickson OQ, Chatarpaul L, Burgess D. 1989. Nutrient cycling following whole-tree and conventional harvest in northern mixed forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 19: 725–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoque AKMF. 1977. Soil erosion in teak plantation. In Proc. of first Bangladesh National Conference on Forestry, Dhaka, Bangladesh, pp. 80–83.

  • Jackson ML. 1973. Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N. Jersey, USA. pp. 205–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson CE, Johnson AH, Siccama TG. 1991. Whole-tree clearcutting on exchangeable cations and soil acidity. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 55: 502–508.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu SL, Fu BJ, Lu YH, Chen LD. 2002. Effects of reforestation and deforestation on soil properties in humid mountainous areas: a case study in Wolong Nature Reserve, Sichuan province, China. Soil Use and Management, 18: 376–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lugo AE, Sanchez MJ. 1986. Land use and organic carbon content of some subtropical soils. Plant and Soil, 96: 185–196.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lu D, Moran E, Mausel P. 2002. Linking Amazonian secondary succession forest growth to soil properties. Land degradation Division, 13: 331–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minitab Inc. 1996. Minitab user’s guide, release 11. Minitab, State College, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mongabay. 2000. http://rainforests.mongabay.com/deforestation/2000/Bangladesh.htm

  • Moyo S, O’Keefe P, Sill M. 1993. The Southern African Environment: Profiles of the SADC Countries. ETC Foundation/Earthscan Publishers, London, 354 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mroz GD, Jurgensen MF, Frederick D,J. 1985. Soil nutrient changes following whole tree harvesting on tree- northern hardwood sites. Soil Science Society of America, 49: 1552–1557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohta S. 1990. Influence of deforestation on the soils of the Pantabagan area, Central Auzon, Philippines. Soil Science & Plant Nutrition, 36: 561–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrick JH, Smith DW. 1975. Forest management and nutrient cycling in eastern hardwoods. USDA For. Serv. Res. Pap.ME-4. Northeast For. Exp. Stat. Broomal, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasiah V, Kay BD. 1995. Runoff and soil loss as influenced by selected stability parameter and cropping and tillage practices. Geoderma, 68: 321–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RSS (Reconnaissance Soil Survey). 1976. Reconnaissance Soil Survey of Sadar South and Cox’s Bazar Subdivision Chittagong District. Department of Soil Survey.Government of the Peoples Republic of Bangladesh, 5pp

  • Sahani U, Behera N. 2001. Impact of deforestation on soil physicochemical characteristics, microbial biomass and microbial activity of tropical soil. Land Degradation & Development, 12: 93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saikh H, Varadachari C, Ghosh K. 1998. Effects of deforestation and cultivation on soil CEC and contents of exchangeable bases: A case study in Simlipal National Park, India. Plant and Soil, 204(2): 175–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vagen TG. 2004. Change in soil quality in relation to deforestation and land use change in the highlands of Madagascar. Available at http://www.cababstractsplus.org/google/abstract_learnmore.asp.

  • Walkley A, Black IA. 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science, 37: 29–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Soil Science, University of Chittagong, Chittagong, 4331, Bangladesh

    M.A. Zaman & K.T. Osman

  2. Institute of Forestry and Environmental Sciences, University of Chittagong, Chittagong, 4331, Bangladesh

    S. M. Sirajul Haque

Authors
  1. M.A. Zaman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K.T. Osman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. M. Sirajul Haque
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M.A. Zaman.

Additional information

The online version is available at http://www.springerlink.com

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zaman, M., Osman, K. & Sirajul Haque, S.M. Comparative study of some soil properties in forested and deforested areas in Cox’s Bazar and Rangamati Districts, Bangladesh. Journal of Forestry Research 21, 319–322 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-010-0077-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-010-0077-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation