Skip to main content
Log in

Discourse Communities and the Discourse of Experience

  • Symposium: Legacy of Miles Little
  • Published:
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Discourse communities are groups of people who share common ideologies, and common ways of speaking about things. They can be sharply or loosely defined. We are each members of multiple discourse communities. Discourse can colonize the members of discourse communities, taking over domains of thought by means of ideology. The development of new discourse communities can serve positive ends, but discourse communities create risks as well. In our own work on the narratives of people with interests in health care, for example, we find that patients speak of their illness experiences as victims of circumstance; policy makers construct adverse experiences and challenges as opportunities to be taken; health care workers speak from a mixed perspective, seeing themselves as both victims and opportunists depending on context. To be trapped within the discourse of a particular community is to put at risk the ability to communicate across discourses. Membership of a discourse community can impair the habit of critique, and deny opportunities for heteroglossic discourse. Privileging critique as a mode of discourse perhaps might define the ethical community, suggesting that ethical community may be an antidote to the constraining effects of conventional discourse community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Annandale, E. (1998). The sociology of health and medicine: A critical introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K., Mnookin, R.H., Ross, L., Tversky, A. and Wilson, R., Eds. (1995). Barriers to conflict resolution. New York: WW Norton and Co.

  • Bakhtin, M.M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.

  • Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Campbell, J. (1973 [1949]). The hero with a thousand faces. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • Carnocham, W.B. 1992. The battleground of the curriculum. London: Macmillan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar R. (1996). Grooming, gossip and the evolution of language. London: Faber & Faber.

  • Frank, A.W. (1995). The wounded storyteller: Body, illness, and ethics. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

  • Habermas, J. (1987). The philosophical discourse of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

  • Habermas, J. (1994). The past as future, 90–93. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press.

  • Hammond, K.R. (1996). Human judgement and social policy: Irreducible uncertainty, inevitable error, unavoidable injustice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Hastrup, K. (1995). A passage to anthropology: Between experience and theory. London and New York: Routledge.

  • Illich, I. (1975). Medical Nemesis: The expropriation of health. London: Lothian Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordens, C.F.C., Little, M., Paul, K. and Sayers E.-J. (2001). Life disruption and generic complexity: A social linguistic analysis of narratives of cancer illness. Social Science & Medicine 53(9): 1227–36.

  • Little, M. (1995). Humane medicine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Little, M., Jordens, C.F.C., Paul, K., Montgomery K. and Philipson, B. (1998). Liminality: A major category of the experience of cancer illness. Social Science & Medicine, 47(10), 1485–94.

  • Little, M., Jordens, C.F.C., Paul, K., Sayers, E.-J. and Sriskandarajah, D. (1999a). Approval and disapproval in the narratives of patients with colorectal cancer and their carers. Health, 3(4), 451–67.

  • Little, M., Jordens, C.F.C., Paul, K., Sayers, E.-J. and Sriskandarajah, D. (1999b). The illness trajectory or the illness journey. What’s in a metaphor? MEDIC (Italy), 7(1), 41–8.

  • Little, M., Jordens, C.F.C., Paul, K., Sayers, E.-J. and Sriskandarajah, D. (2000). Face, honor and dignity in the context of colon cancer. Journal of Medical Humanities, 21(4), 229–43.

  • Little, M., Paul, K., Jordens, C.F.C. and Sayers, E.-J. (2000). Vulnerability in the narratives of patients and their carers – studies of colorectal cancer. Health, 4(4), 499–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, M., Jordens, C.F.C., Paul, K. and Sayers, E.-J. (2001). Surviving survival: Life after cancer. Marrickville: Choice Books.

  • Little, M., Jordens, C.F.C., Paul, K. and Sayers, E.-J. (2002). Survivorship and discourses of identity. Psycho-Oncology, 11(2), 170–78.

  • Little, M., Jordens, C.F.C., Paul, K., Sayers, E.-J., Cruickshank, J. A., Stegeman, J. et al. (2002). Discourse in different voices: Reconciling n = 1 and n = many. Social Science & Medicine, 55(7), 1079–87.

  • Lock, M. (2001). Introduction. Health 5(3): 283–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattingly, C. (1998). Healing dramas and clinical plots: The narrative structure of experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Morris P. (1996). Community beyond tradition. In P. Heelas, S. Lash and P. Morris, Detraditionalization, pp. 238–45. Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Moynihan, R. (1998). Too much medicine? The business of health and the risks for you. Sydney: ABC Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Inquiry into the Separation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders from Their Families (1997). Bringing them home. Sydney: Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission, 689.

  • Nelson, H.L. (2001). Damaged identities, narrative repair. New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, A. (2001). Biotechnology, political rationality and discourses on health risk. Health 5(3): 293–309.

  • Scott, J.W. (1991). The evidence of experience. Critical Inquiry 17: 773–797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, M.A. (1997). Moral status: Obligations to persons and other living things. Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (1988). Keywords: A vocabulary of culture and society. London: Fontana.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are particularly grateful to the readers of earlier versions of this article for their patience and constructive criticism. Their attention to detail and their capacity to make helpful suggestions seem to us to have been beyond the call of duty.

This work has been supported by grants from the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, Strathfield Private Hospital, the Thyne Reid Trust No. 1 (Education), Mrs Caroline Simpson and the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Sydney.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miles Little.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Miles Little, Christopher F.C. Jordens & Emma-Jane Sayers, Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine Vol 7(1): pp. 73–86, https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459303007001619, copyright © 2003 Copyright © 2003 SAGE Publications, Reprinted by Permission of SAGE Publications

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Little, M., Jordens, C.F.C. & Sayers, EJ. Discourse Communities and the Discourse of Experience. Bioethical Inquiry 19, 61–69 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-022-10176-w

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-022-10176-w

Keywords

Navigation