Abstract
The classical method for designing against high-cycle fatigue fracture is based primarily on statistical models derived from laboratory experimental data. This paper considers a number of actual fatigue failures where the analyses of the failures, in part, made use of classical high-cycle fatigue resistance design methodology as an analytical tool. This paper uses failure analyses to demonstrate that the long-taught classical methodology is useful and accurate as both a design and an analysis tool. The usefulness and accuracy of the method is verified in that it is shown to have predicted actual failures, given known materials, manufacturing histories, and service operating conditions. Example analyses include: a fatigue-cracked roll from a paper-making machine, a fractured anvil on a steam powered forge, and a fractured shaft on a helical ribbon dryer.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Shigley, J.E.: Mechanical Design Engineering, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, 1972
Juvinall, R.C., Marshek, K.M.: Fundamentals of Machine Component Design, 2nd edn. Wiley, 1991
Juvinall, R.C.: Stress, Strain, and Strength. McGraw-Hill, 1967
Pilkey, W.D.: Peterson’s Stress Concentration Factors, 2nd edn. Wiley, 1997
Harris, R.D.: “Fracture Analysis of a Forging Anvil,” ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exposition, 1998, 98-WA/DE-13
Harris, R.D, Jur, T.A.: “Failure Analysis of a Large Dryer Shaft,” ASME Winter Annual Meeting, 1993, 93-WA/DE-12
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Harris, D., Jur, T. Classical Fatigue Design Techniques as a Failure Analysis Tool. J Fail. Anal. and Preven. 9, 81–87 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-008-9202-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-008-9202-1