Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Failure Analysis of Unidirectional Ceramic Matrix Composite Lamina and Cross-Ply Laminate under Fiber Direction Uniaxial Tensile Load: Cohesive Zone Modeling and Brittle Fracture Mechanics Approach

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current research work presents the computational micromechanical analysis of the room temperature tensile failure behavior of unidirectional (UD) and cross-ply (0/90) ceramic matrix composites (CMCs). For computational micromechanical analysis, three-dimensional (3D) representative volume element (RVE) and multi-fiber multilayer RVE (M2 RVE) models are generated that are representative of the lamina and the laminate under investigation. The RVE and M2 RVE models are generated by replicating the fiber distribution, and the placement of the fibers observed in a microscopic image of an actual CMC laminate. The generated RVE models consist of the discrete representation of individual constituent phases of the CMC such as fibers, interphase, matrix, and the fiber–interphase interface region. Under the applied external tensile load, the fiber–interphase interface interactions are modeled using the cohesive elements that follow the bilinear traction separation law. The matrix, fiber, and interphase materials failure behavior is captured using a brittle cracking model. In order to validate the proposed numerical methodology, the predicted average stress–strain curve at the UD laminate level is compared to the experimental stress–strain curve reported in the literature. In addition, the observed different phases in the predicted stress–strain curve are validated with the literature data. Using the proposed numerical methodology, a detailed local stress–strain and damage analysis leads to an observation that the so-called ductile stress–strain behavior (kink in the stress–strain curve) of a CMC UD laminate under uniaxial fiber direction tensile loads is mainly caused by the matrix damage initiation. Apart from the SiC material properties such as strength and fracture energy, it is also observed that the RVE size influences the average strength and failure strain predictions using computational micromechanics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. Daggumati, A. Sharma, and Y.S. Pydi, Micromechanical FE Analysis of SiCf/SiC Composite with BN Interface, Silicon, 2020, 12(2), p 245–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-019-00119-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. R. Naslain, Design, Preparation and Properties of Non-oxide CMCs for Application in Engines and Nuclear Reactors: An Overview, Compos. Sci. Technol., 2004, 64(2), p 155–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00230-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Grujicic, J.S. Snipes, R. Galgalikar, R. Yavari, V. Avuthu, and S. Ramaswami, Multi-length-scale Derivation of the Room-Temperature Material Constitutive Model for SiC/SiC Ceramic-Matrix Composites, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part L J. Mater. Des. Appl., 2015, 231(5), p 443–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464420715600002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. D.G. Dunn, The effect of fiber volume fraction in HiperComp® SiC-SiC composites. Ph.D Dissertation, Alfred Univ., New York (2010).

  5. A.G. Evans, Ceramics and Ceramic Composites as High-Temperature Structural Materials: Challenges and Opportunities, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A Phys. Eng. Sci., 1995, 351(1697), p 511–527. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1995.0050

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. V. Bheemreddy, K. Chandrashekhara, L.R. Dharani, and G.E. Hilmas, Computational Study of Micromechanical Damage Behavior in Continuous Fiber-Reinforced Ceramic Composites, J. Mater. Sci., 2016, 51(18), p 8610–8624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-0120-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. A.G. Evans and F.W. Zok, The Physics and Mechanics of Fibre-Reinforced Brittle Matrix Composites, J. Mater. Sci., 1994, 29(15), p 3857–3896. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00355946

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. K.M. Sevener, J.M. Tracy, Z. Chen, J.D. Kiser, and S. Daly, Crack Opening Behavior in Ceramic Matrix Composites, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 2017, 100(10), p 4734–4747. https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.14976

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. J.M. Tracy, Multi-scale Investigation of Damage Mechanisms in SiC/SiC Ceramic Matrix Composites, Univ of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 2014

    Google Scholar 

  10. B.A. Bednarcyk, S.K. Mital, E.J. Pineda, and S.M. Arnold, Multiscale Modeling of Ceramic Matrix Composites, in 56th AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, 2015, p 1191. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2015-1191.

  11. S. Mital, R. Goldberg, and P. Bonacuse, Modeling of Damage Initiation and Progression in a SiC/SiC Woven Ceramic Matrix Composite,” in 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, 2012, p 1–14. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2012-1652.

  12. T.J. Vaughan and C.T. McCarthy, Micromechanical Modelling of the Transverse Damage Behaviour in Fibre Reinforced Composites, Compos. Sci. Technol., 2011, 71(3), p 388–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.12.006

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. C. McCarthy and T. Vaughan, Micromechanical Failure Analysis of Advanced Composite Materials, in Numerical Modelling of Failure in Advanced Composite Materials, Elsevier Ltd., 2015, p 379–409.

  14. C. González and J. LLorca, Mechanical Behavior of Unidirectional Fiber-Reinforced Polymers under Transverse Compression: Microscopic Mechanisms and Modeling, Compos. Sci. Technol., 2007, 67(13), p 2795–2806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.02.001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. L. Yang, Y. Yan, Y. Liu, and Z. Ran, Microscopic Failure Mechanisms of Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites under Transverse Tension and Compression, Compos. Sci. Technol., 2012, 72(15), p 1818–1825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.08.001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. L. Yang, Z. Wu, Y. Cao, and Y. Yan, Micromechanical Modelling and Simulation of Unidirectional Fibre-Reinforced Composite under Shear Loading, J. Reinf. Plast. Compos., 2014, 34(1), p 72–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684414562873

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. M. Romanowicz, A Numerical Approach for Predicting the Failure Locus of Fiber Reinforced Composites under Combined Transverse Compression and Axial Tension, Comput. Mater. Sci., 2012, 51(1), p 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.07.039

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. M. Braginsky and C.P. Przybyla, Simulation of Crack Propagation/Deflection in Ceramic Matrix Continuous Fiber Reinforced Composites with Weak Interphase via the Extended Finite Element Method, Compos. Struct., 2016, 136, p 538–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.10.038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. S.K. Mital, B.A. Bednarcyk, S.M. Arnold, and J. Lang, Modeling of Melt-Infiltrated SiC/SiC Composite Properties, Technical Report. NASA/TM-2009–215806, E-17069, NASA Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, OH, United States, 2009.

  20. C. Chateau, L. Gélébart, M. Bornert, and J. Crépin, Micromechanical Modeling of the Elastic Behavior of Unidirectional CVI, SiC/SiC Composites, Int. J. Solids Struct., 2015, 58, p 322–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.11.020

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. E. Totry, C. González, and J. LLorca, Prediction of the Failure Locus of C/PEEK Composites under Transverse Compression and Longitudinal Shear Through Computational Micromechanics, Compos. Sci. Technol., 2008, 68(15–16), p 3128–3136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.07.011

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. D. Garoz et al., Consistent Application of Periodic Boundary Conditions in Implicit and Explicit Finite Element Simulations of Damage in Composites, Compos. Part B, 2019, 168, p 254–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.023

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. ABAQUS, Analysis User’s Manual. Version 6.10,” Dassault Systemes Simulia, Inc., 2010.

  24. J.G. Rots, Computational Modeling of Concrete Fracture, Ph.D Dissertation, Delft Univ. of Tech., Netherlands, 1988.

  25. A. Hillerborg, M. Modéer, and P.E. Petersson, Analysis of Crack Formation and Crack Growth in Concrete by Means of Fracture Mechanics and Finite Elements, Cem. Concr. Res., 1976, 6(6), p 773–781. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(76)90007-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Z.P. Bazant and B.H. Oh, Crack Band Theory for Fracture of Concrete, Matér. Constr., 1983, 16(3), p 155–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02486267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. J.G. Rots and J. Blaauwendraad, Crack Models for Concrete: Discrete or Smeared? Fixed, Multi-directional or Rotating?, Heron, 1989, 34(1), p 3–59

    Google Scholar 

  28. G. Corman and K. Luthra, Melt Infiltrated Ceramic Composites (Hipercomp) For Gas Turbine Engine Applications, in Continuous Fiber Ceramic Composites Program Phase II Final Report for the Period May 1994–Sept. 2005, 2006, p 31–53.

  29. C. Chateau, L. Gélébart, M. Bornert, J. Crépin, D. Caldemaison, and C. Sauder, Modeling of Damage in Unidirectional Ceramic Matrix Composites and Multi-scale Experimental Validation on Third Generation SiC/SiC Minicomposites, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 2014, 63, p 298–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2013.09.001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. D. Zhang and D.R. Hayhurst, Stress–strain and Fracture Behaviour of 0°/90° and Plain Weave Ceramic Matrix Composites from Tow Multi-axial Properties, Int. J. Solids Struct., 2010, 47(21), p 2958–2969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2010.06.023

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. W.A. Curtin, Theory of Mechanical Properties of Ceramic-Matrix Composites, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 1991, 74(11), p 2837–2845. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb06852.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. W.A. Curtin, B.K. Ahn, and N. Takeda, Modeling Brittle and Tough Stress–strain Behavior in Unidirectional Ceramic Matrix Composites, Acta Mater., 1998, 46(10), p 3409–3420. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00041-X

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. J.A. Coppola and R.C. Bradt, Measurement of Fracture Surface Energy of SiC, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 1972, 55(9), p 455–460. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1972.tb11339.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Tirupati, Tirupati, A.P, 517506, India

    S. Daggumati

  2. Discipline of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Indore, Simrol, Indore, 453552, India

    A. Sharma, A. Kasera & N. Upadhyay

Authors
  1. S. Daggumati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Sharma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. Kasera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. N. Upadhyay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Daggumati.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Daggumati, S., Sharma, A., Kasera, A. et al. Failure Analysis of Unidirectional Ceramic Matrix Composite Lamina and Cross-Ply Laminate under Fiber Direction Uniaxial Tensile Load: Cohesive Zone Modeling and Brittle Fracture Mechanics Approach. J. of Materi Eng and Perform 29, 2049–2060 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-020-04724-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-020-04724-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation