Skip to main content
Log in

Determination of the Johnson-Cook Constitutive Model Parameters of Materials by Cluster Global Optimization Algorithm

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 04 August 2016

Abstract

The Johnson-Cook (J-C) constitutive model is widely used in the finite element simulation, as this model shows the relationship between stress and strain in a simple way. In this paper, a cluster global optimization algorithm is proposed to determine the J-C constitutive model parameters of materials. A set of assumed parameters is used for the accuracy verification of the procedure. The parameters of two materials (401 steel and 823 steel) are determined. Results show that the procedure is reliable and effective. The relative error between the optimized and assumed parameters is no more than 4.02%, and the relative error between the optimized and assumed stress is 0.2% × 10−5. The J-C constitutive parameters can be determined more precisely and quickly than the traditional manual procedure. Furthermore, all the parameters can be simultaneously determined using several curves under different experimental conditions. A strategy is also proposed to accurately determine the constitutive parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P.L. Mangono, The Principles of Materials Selection for Engineering Design, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Dey, T. Borvik, O.S. Hopperstad, and M. Langseth, On the Influence of Constitutive Relation in Projectile Impact of Steel Plates, Int. J. Impact Eng., 2007, 34(3), p 464–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. B. Langrand, P. Geoffroy, J.-L. Petitniot, J. Fabis et al., Identification Technique of Constitutive Model Parameters for Crashworthiness Modeling, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 1999, 4, p 215–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. K.R. William and S.E. Jones, A Revised Form for the Johnson-Cook Strength Model, Int. J. Impact Eng., 1998, 21(8), p 609–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. G.R. Johnson and W.H. Cook, A Constitutive Model and Data for Metal Subjected to Large Strains, High Strain Rates and High Temperatures, Proceedings of the Seventh Symposium on Ballistics, The Hague, The Netherlands, 1983, p 541–547

  6. W.J. Kang, S.S. Cho, H. Huh, and D.T. Chung, Identification of Dynamic Behavior of Sheet Metals for an Auto-Body with Tension Split Hopkinson Bar, Society of Automotive Engineers, Paper #981010, 1998, p 908–913

  7. J.M. Lacy, J.K. Shelley, and J.H. Weathersby, et al., Optimization-Based Constitutive Parameter Identification from Sparse Taylor Cylinder Data, 81st Shock and Vibration Symposium, USA, 2010.

  8. G. Chen, C. Ren, Yu Wei et al., Application of Genetic Algorithms for Optimizing the Johnson-Cook Constitutive Model Parameters When Simulating the Titanium Alloy Ti-6Al-4V Machining Process, Eng. Manuf., 2012, 226, p 1287–1297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. G.H. Majzoobi, S.F.Z. Khosroshahi, and H.B. Mohammadloo, Determination of Materials Parameters Under Dynamic Loading: Part II: Optimization, Comput. Mater. Sci., 2010, 49(2), p 201–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. L. Gao, F. Lemarchand, and M. Lequime, Application of Global Optimization Algorithms for Optical Thin Film Index Determination from Spectro-photometric Analysis, Adv. Opt. Thin Films IV, 2011, 8168, p 8168B-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. L. Gao, F. Lemarchand, and M. Lequime, Exploitation of Multiple Incidences Spectrometric Measurements for Thin Film Reverse Engineering, Opt. Express, 2012, 20(14), p 15734–15751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. T. Csendes, B. Daróczy, and Z. Hantos, Nonlinear Parameter Estimation by Global Optimization: Comparison of Local Search Methods in Respiratory System Modelling, System Modelling and Optimization, Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, No. 84, A. Prékopa and B. Straziczky, Eds., 1986, p 188–192

  13. T. Csendes, Nonlinear Parameter Estimation by Global Optimization—Efficiency and Reliability, Acta Cybern., 1988, 8, p 361–370

    Google Scholar 

  14. R.W. Becker and G.V. Lago, A Global Optimization Algorithm, Proceedings of the 8th Allerton Conference on Circuits and Systems Theory, 1970, p 3–12

  15. A.A. Törn, Global Optimization as a Combination of Global and Local Search, Proceedings of Computer Simulation Versus Analytical Solutions for Business and Economic Models, 1972, p 191–206

  16. F. Liu, S. Yuan, and Q. Chen, Comparative Study of High Energy Beam Controlling the Power of Fragmentation from Projectile, Ordnance Mater. Sci. Eng., 2008, 1(1), p 67–70

    Google Scholar 

  17. H. Dong, G. Li, and N. Chen, Dynamic Deformation Behavior of High Strength 823 Steel, Mater. Sci. Technol., 1996, 17, p 16–19

    Google Scholar 

  18. Y. Shu, W. Zeng, J. Zhou et al., A Study of BT20 Alloy High Temperature Deformation Behavior, Mater. Sci. Technol., 2005, 13(1), p 66–69

    Google Scholar 

  19. R. Smerd, S. Winkler, C. Salisbury, M. Worswick et al., High Strain Rate Tensile Testing of Automotive Aluminum Alloy Sheet, Int. J. Impact Eng., 2005, 32, p 541–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhipeng Huang.

Additional information

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11665-016-2256-4.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, Z., Gao, L., Wang, Y. et al. Determination of the Johnson-Cook Constitutive Model Parameters of Materials by Cluster Global Optimization Algorithm. J. of Materi Eng and Perform 25, 4099–4107 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-016-2178-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-016-2178-1

Keywords

Navigation