Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction and Optimization of Pulsed Current Gas Tungsten Arc Welding Process Parameters to Obtain Sound Weld Pool Geometry in Titanium Alloy Using Lexicographic Method

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstact

In this article the weld pool geometry of pulsed current gas tungsten arc (GTA)-welded titanium alloy was analyzed. Increase in use of pulsed current process creates dependancy on the use of mathematical equations to predict the weld pool geometry. Hence, the development of mathematical models using four factors, five levels, central composite design was attempted. The developed models were checked for their adequacy. Lexicographic method was used for optimizing the process parameters of pulsed current GTA welding technique. Optimizing the process parameters has resulted in bringing out strong weld pool geometry, which was later confirmed by conducting confirmation tests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Y. Qi., D. Ju., H. Quan and Z. Liying 2000 ‘Electron Beam Welding, Laser Beam Welding and Gas Tungsten Arc Welding of Titanium Sheet’, Mater. Sci. Eng., A280, 177–181

    Google Scholar 

  2. R.P. Simpson: Refinement of Weld Fusion Zones in Alpha–Beta Titanium Alloys, Weld. J.; 1977, 56, 67s.

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. Madhusudhan Reddy, Welding of Aluminium and Alloys, Proceedings of ISTE Summer School on Recent Developments in Materials Joining, Annamalai University, 2001

  4. K. Prasad Rao, Fusion Zone Grain Refinement in GTA Welds Using Magnetic Arc Oscillation and Current Pulsing, RAMP, 2001, p 176–196

  5. G. Madhusudhan Reddy, A.A. Gokhale, and K. Prasad Rao, Optimization of Pulse Frequency in Pulsed Current Gas Tungsten Arc Welding of Al-Lithium Alloy Steels, Mater. Sci. Technol., 1993, 14, p 61–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Balasubramanian, V. Jayabalan and V. Balasubramanian 2006 Optimizing the Pulsed Current Gas Tungsten Arc Welding Parameters. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 22, (6), 821–825.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S.C. Juang and Y.S. Tarang, Process Parameter Selection for Optimizing the Weld Pool Geometry in the Tungsten Inert Gas Welding of Stainless Steel, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2002, 122, p 33–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Balasubramanian, V. Jayabalan, and V. Balasubramanian, A Mathematical Model to Predict Impact Toughness of Pulsed Current Gas Tungsten Arc Welded Titanium Alloy, J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2008, 35, p 852–858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. D.C. Montgomery, Design and Analysis of Experiments, 3rd ed., John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1991

  10. N. Arunkumar, L. Karunamoorthy, S. Anand and T. Ramesh Babu (2006) Linear Approach for Solving a Piecewise Linear Vendor Selection Problem of Quantity Discounts Using Lexicographic Method, J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 28, 1254–1260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Ravindran, D.T. Phillips, and D.J. Solberg, Operations Research: Principles and Practice, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1987

  12. Y.S. Tarang, H.L. Tsai and S.S.Yeh (1999) Modeling, Optimization and Classification of Weld Quality in TIG Welding. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 39, (9), 1427–1438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. V. Ravisankar and V. Balasubramanian 2006 “Optimising Pulsed Current TIG Welding Parameters to Refine the Fusion Zone”, Sci. Technol. Weld. Join. 1 (11), pp. 57–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Balasubramanian V. Jayabalan and V. Balasubramanian 2008 “Effect of Current Pulsing on Tensile Properties of Titanium Alloy”, J. Mater. Des. 29, 1459–1466

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. M. Balasubramanian, V. Jayabalan and V. Balasubramanian (2008) Effect of Microstructure on Pulse GTA Welded α-β Titanium Alloy. J. Mater. Lett. 62 (6–7):1102–1106.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express sincere thanks to the Department of Manufacturing Engineering, Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar, Tamil Nadu for extending the facilities of Metal Joining Laboratory and Material Testing Laboratory to carryout this investigation. The authors are grateful to Mr. K. Anbazhagan, Chennai for making necessary arrangements to procure the base metal for investigation. The authors wish to thank Mr. S. Babu, DRDO Project Associate, Annamalai University for rendering helping hand to carryout the statistical analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Balasubramanian.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Balasubramanian, M., Jayabalan, V. & Balasubramanian, V. Prediction and Optimization of Pulsed Current Gas Tungsten Arc Welding Process Parameters to Obtain Sound Weld Pool Geometry in Titanium Alloy Using Lexicographic Method. J. of Materi Eng and Perform 18, 871–877 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-008-9305-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-008-9305-6

Keywords

Navigation