Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of electroplating parameters on the composition and morphology of Sn-Ag solder

  • Special Issue Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Electronic Materials Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Sn-Ag solder was electrodeposited from a bath that basically is composed of tin sulfate (SnSO4), silver nitrate (AgNO3), and thiourea (CH4N2S), acting as a complexing agent to silver. The composition and morphology of electrodeposited Sn-Ag solder were studied in terms of silver concentration in bath current density, duty cycle, and additives. It was possible to control silver content in the electrodeposit by means of varying silver concentration in bath and current density. The microstructure and surface morphology of the electrodeposit become finer and smoother with increasing current density. The pulse-current (PC) plating method was applied to compare to the conventional direct-current (DC) plating. Varying duty cycle in PC plating did not change the microstructure in general, but some improvement in surface roughness was observed compared to DC plating. However, the silver composition in the electrodeposit increased with decreasing the duty cycle at a constant current density. An addition of a surface-active agent helped to reduce the surface roughness and the variation of silver content in the electrodeposit. In an optimum condition, eutectic Sn-Ag solder bumps with a fine pitch of 30 µm and height of 15 µm were successfully electroplated. The composition of Sn-Ag bumps was analyzed by energy dispersive x-ray spectrometry (EDS) and wavelength dispersive x-ray spectrometry (WDS) methods, and the surface morphology was characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and a three-dimensional surface analyzer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. European Union, WEEE Directive, 3rd Draft (2000).

  2. Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare Waste Regulation (1998).

  3. E. Menzel, German patent 718,252 (1942).

  4. H. Leidheiser, Jr. and A.R.P. Ghuman, J. Electrochem. Soc. 120, 60 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  5. J.C. Puippe and W. Fluehman, Plating Surface Finishing 46 (1983).

  6. S. Arai, Microjoining and Assembly Technology Electronic 3rd Symp., Feb. 6–7 (1997).

  7. T. Kondo et al., Plating Surface Finishing 51 (1998).

  8. S. Arai, T. Watanabe, and M. Higashi, U.S. patent 5,902,472 (11 May 1999).

  9. K. Oshima and S. Yuasa, U.S. patent 5,911,866 (15 June 1999).

  10. S. Arai, U.S. patent 5,948,235 (7 September 1999).

  11. I. Yanada and M. Tsujimoto, U.S. patent 6,099,713 (8 August 2000).

  12. M.P. Toban, D.C. Marcktell, N.D. Brown, and C.A. Doyle, U.S. patent 6,210,556 (3 April 2001).

  13. F.A. Lowenheim, Electroplating (New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  14. A.C. Tan, Tin and Solder Plating in the Semiconductor Industry (New York: Chapman & Hall, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  15. S.H. Kim, J.Y. Kim, J. Yu, and T.Y. Lee, J. Electron. Mater. 33, 948 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. I. Ohno, J. Met. Finishing Jpn. 39, 149 (1988).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. A. Brenner, Electrodeposition of Alloys, vol. I (New York: Academic Press, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  18. C.C. Wan et al., Plating 559 (1974).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, J.Y., Yu, J., Lee, J.H. et al. The effects of electroplating parameters on the composition and morphology of Sn-Ag solder. J. Electron. Mater. 33, 1459–1464 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-004-0087-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-004-0087-9

Key words

Navigation