Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of moisture and elevated temperature on reliability of interfacial adhesion in plastic packages

  • Regular Issue Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Electronic Materials Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The interfacial-adhesion performance between the lead frame and molding compound was studied after temperature cycles and hygrothermal aging, simulating a typical package-assembly process. The hygrothermal aging involved a treatment at 85°C and 85% relative humidity (RH) for 168 h and three cycles of infrared (IR) solder-reflow condition. The interfacial-bond strengths were measured using shear and lead-pull tests. The lead-frame surface finishes studied include a bare Cu, microetched Cu, spot Ag coating, Ni, Pd/Ni, and Au/Ni coatings. Special emphasis was placed on the study of the changes in surface characteristics and the corresponding interfacial adhesion after various manufacturing processes. It was found that moderate thermal cycles enhanced the interfacial adhesion for all coated lead frames, except the Ni coating. Hygrothermal aging was detrimental to the interfacial-bond strength, especially for hydrophilic or polar surfaces, such as bare Cu, Ag, Pd/Ni, and Au/Ni coated lead frames. The introduction of tiny dimples etched on the lead frame was effective in mitigating the reduction in interfacial-bond strength arising from hygrothermal aging. This result confirms the important role of the mechanical-interlocking mechanism provided by dimples in retaining the interfacial adhesion in a humid environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L.T. Nguyen, ASME J. Electron. Packaging 115, 346 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  2. S.V. Golwalkar, Thermal Stress and Strain in Microelectronics Packaging, ed. J. Lau, (New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1994), pp. 445–466.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Lin, E. Blackshear and P. Serisky, Proc. 26th Int. Reliability Physics Symp. (Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 1988), pp. 83–89.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. T. Steiner and D. Suhl, IEEE Trans. CHMT 10, 209 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. Lea and D. Tilbrook, Soldering Surf. Mount. Technol. 3, 30 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. L. Yip, T. Massingill, and H. Naini, 46th ECTC (Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 1996), pp. 829–835.

    Google Scholar 

  7. K. Sawada, T. Nakazawa, K. Matsumoto, Y. Hiruta, and T. Sudo, 32nd Int. Reliability Physics Symp. (Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 1994), pp. 114–119.

    Google Scholar 

  8. T. Nakazawa, K. Sawada, and T. Sudo, 8th Int. Microelectronics Conf. (Tokyo: Society for Hybrid Microelectronics, 1994), pp. 231–236.

    Google Scholar 

  9. I. Fukuzawa, S. Ishiguro, and S. Nambu, 23rd Int. Reliability Physics Symp. (New York: IEEE, 1995), pp. 192–199.

    Google Scholar 

  10. D.E. Pope and L.M. Clifton, 5th Ann. IEEE/IETM/CPMT Symp. (1988), pp. 89–92.

  11. G.S. Ganesan, G. Lewis, A. Woosley, W. Lindsay, and H. Berg, 45th ECTC (Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 1995), pp. 450–454.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Y. Orii, O. Suzuki, A. Nakanishi, K. Takahashi, R. Kimoto, and T. Nishita, 17th Int. Symp. for Testing and Failure Analysis (1991), pp. 213–220.

  13. IPC-SM-786A, The Institute for Interconnecting and Packaging Electronic Circuits, Lincolnwood, IL (1995).

  14. JEDEC Standard JESD22-A112 (1994).

  15. M. Lebbai, J.K. Kim, and M.M.F. Yuen, in this issue.

  16. M. Lebbai, J.K. Kim, W.K. Szeto, M.M.F. Yuen, and P. Tong, in this issue.

  17. L.T. Nguyen, R.H.Y. Lo, and J.G. Belani, IEEE Int. Electronics Manufacturing Technology Symp. (Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 1993), pp. 204–212.

    Google Scholar 

  18. T.R. Tubbs and P. Procter, 7th Int. SAMPE Electronics Conf. (Covina, CA: Society for the Advancement of Material and Process Engineering, 1994), pp. 541–552.

    Google Scholar 

  19. S. Wu, J. Adhes. 5, 39 (1973).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. R.A. Glendhill and A.J. Kinloch, J. Adhes. 6, 315 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  21. S. Kim, 41st ECTC (Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 1991), 750–758.

    Google Scholar 

  22. J.H. Lau and C. Chang, IEEE Trans. Comp. Hybrids Manuf. Technol. 22, 111 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  23. S. Luo and C.P. Wong, EMAP 2000 (Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 2000), pp. 243–250.

    Google Scholar 

  24. B.H. Moon, H.Y. Yoo, and K. Sawada, 48th ECTC (Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 1998), pp. 1148–1153.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Y. Tomioka and J. Miyake, 49th ECTC (Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 1999), pp. 714–720.

    Google Scholar 

  26. S.J. Cho, K.W. Paik, and Y.G. Kim, IEEE Trans. Comp. Packag. Manuf. Technol. Part B 20, 167 (1997).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. C.T. Chong, A. Leslie, L.T. Beng, and C. Lee, 45th ECTC (Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 1995), pp. 463–469.

    Google Scholar 

  28. H. Ohsuga, H. Suzuki, T. Aihara, and T. Hamano, 44th ECTC (Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 1994), pp. 141–146.

    Google Scholar 

  29. C. Newey and G. Weaver, Materials Principles and Practice (London: Butterworths, 1990), pp. 125–129.

    Google Scholar 

  30. M. Pecht, Microelectronic Packaging Hand Book (New York: Marcel Dekker, 1991), pp. 203–233.

    Google Scholar 

  31. O. Yoshioka, N. Okabe, S. Nagayama, R. Yamauchi, and G. Murakami, 39th ECTC (Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 1989), pp. 464–471.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lebbai, M., Kim, JK. & Yuen, M.M.F. Effects of moisture and elevated temperature on reliability of interfacial adhesion in plastic packages. J. Electron. Mater. 32, 574–582 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-003-0144-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-003-0144-9

Key words

Navigation