Skip to main content
Log in

Future steelmaking technologies and the role of basic research

  • Published:
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The steel industry is going through a technological revolution that will not only change how steel is produced but also the entire structure of the industry. The drivers for the new or improved technologies, including reduction in capital requirements, possible shortages in raw materials such as coke and low residual scrap, environmental concerns, and customer demands are briefly examined. The required response of the industry to these drivers will be new processes such as direct ironmaking, near net shape casting, and those to improve charge materials to the electric arc furnace (EAF).

The know-how for these process improvoeemnts and revolutionary technologies can be purchased, if it exists. However, since the U.S. industry has a unique set of drivers, it may be necessary to develop many of the new technologies through its own research and development. The current status of research and developoment in the United States and selected international producers was examined. As expected, it was found that the industry’s research capabilities have been greatly reduced. Furthermore, less than half of the companies that identified a given technology as critical have significant research and development programs addressing the technology. It is clear that, in many cases, these technologies must be developed collaboratively using all of the intellectual resources available, including universities. Much of the basic process understanding and data for optimization can be obtained from basic research, which is highly focused on the requirements of the new process, thus eliminating some expensive pilot plant trials.

Examples of how basic research aided in process improvements in the past are given. The examples include demonstrating how fundamentals of reaction kinetics, improved nitrogen control, and thermodynamics of systems helped reduce nozzle clogging and how fluid flow studies reduced defects in casting. However, in general, basic research did not play a major role in processes previously developed but helped our understanding and aided optimization. To have a major impact, basic research must be focused and be an integral part of any new process development. An example where this has been done successfully is the AISI Direct Ironmaking and Waste Oxide Recycle projects, in which fundamental studies on reduction, slag foaming, and postcombustion reactions have led to process understanding, control, and optimization. Industry leaders recognize the value and need for basic research but insist it be truly relevant and done with industry input. From these examples, the lessons learned on how to make basic research more effective are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Szekely: Metall. Trans. B, 1980, vol. 11B, pp. 353–71.

    Google Scholar 

  2. K. Brotzman: Steelmaking Conf. Proc. ISS, 1987, vol. 70.

  3. T. Dancy: Metall. Trans. B, 1977, vol. 8B, pp. 201–13.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. R.J. Fruehan, H.W. Paxton, F. Garratani, and L. Lave: The Future Steelmaking Industry and Its Technologies, Idaho National Research Laboratory, Idaho Falls, ID, INEL, 95/0046, Jan. 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R.J. Fruehan and H. Uljon: Current Steel Industry Research Capabilities, Sloan Steel Industry Study Report, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.

  6. P. Nilles: Proc. 77th Steelmaking Conf., ISS, Chicago, IL, 1994, p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R.R. Pehlke and J.F. Elliott: Trans. TMS-AIME, 1963, vol. 227, p. 844.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. R.J. Fruehan and L.J. Martonik: Metall. Trans. B, 1980, vol. 11B, pp. 615–21.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Byrne and G.R. Belton: Metall. Trans. B, 1983, vol. 14B, pp. 441–49.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. P.C. Glaws and R.J. Fruehan: Metall. Trans. B., 1985, vol. 16B, pp. 551–59.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. G.R. Belton: Proc. 75th Steelmaking Conf., ISS, Toronto, 1992, p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  12. K. Primos, F. Huber, W. Krieger, and G. Paferi: 5th Int. Iron and Steel Congr., Steelmaking Proc., 1986, vol. 69, p. 613.

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. Goldstein and R.J. Fruehan: 5th Eur. Electric Steelmaking Conf., Paris, June 1995.

  14. N. Bannenberg, B. Bergman, H. Wagner, and H. Gaye: Proc. 6th Int. Iron and Steel Congr., Nagoya, Japan, 1990, vol. 3, p. 603.

    Google Scholar 

  15. H. Uljon and R.J. Fruehan: Research in Progress, 1995, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  16. D. Goldstein and R.J. Fruehan: Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, private communication.

  17. K. Larsen and R.J. Fruehan: Trans. ISS, I&SM, 1990, July, p. 45.

  18. W.H. Emling, T.A. Waugaman, S.L. Feldbauer, and A.W. Cramb: Proc. 77th Steelmaking Conf., ISS, Chicago, IL, 1994, p. 371.

    Google Scholar 

  19. R.J. Fruehan: Savard Lee Symp., TMS, Montreal, 1992, p. 233.

    Google Scholar 

  20. D.-J. Min and R.J. Fruehan: Metall. Trans. B, 1992, vol. 23B, pp. 29–37.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. B. Sarma, A.W. Cramb, and R.J. Fruehan: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 1997, vol. 28B, pp. 0000–00.

    Google Scholar 

  22. B. Sarma and E. Aukrust: AISI Direct Steelmaking, Pittsburgh, PA, private communication, 1992.

  23. K. Ito and R.J. Fruehan: Metall. Trans. B, 1989, vol. 20B, pp. 509–14.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Y. Zhang and R.J. Fruehan: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 1995, vol. 26B, pp. 803–12.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. T. Nagasaka and R.J. Fruehan: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 1994, vol. 25B, pp. 245–53.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Annual Report of the Metals Initiative for Fiscal Year 1994, Office of Industrial Technologies, DOE, Washington DC.

  27. W.P. Sun, J.T. Jonas, F.B. Hawbolt, I.V. Samarasekera, J.K. Brimacombe, and Y. Yue: Advances in Hot Deformation Textures and Microstructures, TMS, Warrendale, PA, 1994, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  28. C. Devadas, J.V. Samarasekera, and F.B. Hawbolt: Metall. Trans. A, 1991, vol. 22A, pp. 307–17.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Professor Richard J. Fruehan received his B.S. and Ph.D. degrees from the University of Pennsylvania in 1963 and 1966, respectively. He was an NSF postdoctoral scholar at Imperial College, University of London, from 1966 to 1967. He then was on the staff of the United States Steel Laboratory until he joined the faculty of Carnegie Mellon University as a Professor in 1980. Dr. Fruehan organized the Center for Iron and Steelmaking Research, an NSF Industry/University Cooperative Research Center, and is currently the director. The Center currently has 24 industrial company members, including those in the United States, Europe, Asia, South Africa, and South America. Dr. Fruehan has authored over 150 papers, two books, and co-authored two additional books and is the holder of five patents. He has received several awards for his publications, including the 1970 and 1982 Hunt Medal (AIME), the 1982 and 1991 John Chipman Medal (AIME), the 1989 Mathewson Gold Medal (TMS-AIME), the 1993 Albert Sauveur Award (ASM INTERNATIONAL), the 1976 Gilcrist Medal (Metals Society, London), and the 1996 Howe Memorial Lecture (ISS-AIME); he also received an IR100 Award for the invention of the oxygen sensor. In 1985, he was elected a distinguished member of the Iron and Steel Society. He served as president of the Iron and Steel Society of AIME from 1990 to 1991. In 1997, he was appointed the U.S. Steel Professor of the Materials Science and Engineering Department, Carnegie Mellon University.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fruehan, R.J. Future steelmaking technologies and the role of basic research. Metall Mater Trans B 28, 743–753 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-997-0001-y

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-997-0001-y

Keywords

Navigation