Skip to main content
Log in

Characterization of Flame Cut Heavy Steel: Modeling of Temperature History and Residual Stress Formation

  • Published:
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Heavy steel plates are used in demanding applications that require both high strength and hardness. An important step in the production of such components is cutting the plates with a cost-effective thermal cutting method such as flame cutting. Flame cutting is performed with a controlled flame and oxygen jet, which burns the steel and forms a cutting edge. However, the thermal cutting of heavy steel plates causes several problems. A heat-affected zone (HAZ) is generated at the cut edge due to the steep temperature gradient. Consequently, volume changes, hardness variations, and microstructural changes occur in the HAZ. In addition, residual stresses are formed at the cut edge during the process. In the worst case, unsuitable flame cutting practices generate cracks at the cut edge. The flame cutting of thick steel plate was modeled using the commercial finite element software ABAQUS. The results of modeling were verified by X-ray diffraction-based residual stress measurements and microstructural analysis. The model provides several outcomes, such as obtaining more information related to the formation of residual stresses and the temperature history during the flame cutting process. In addition, an extensive series of flame cut samples was designed with the assistance of the model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L.R. Soisson: 1993, ASM Handbook Online: ASM International, Vol. 6, pp. 1155-1165.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Thiébaud, J. Drezet, J. Lebet: J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2014, vol. 214, pp. 304-310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. L. Lindgren, A. Carlestam, M. Jonsson: J. Eng. Mater. Tech., 1993, vol. 115, pp. 440-445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Martín-Meizoso, J. Aldazabal, J.L. Pedrejón, S. Moreno: Frattura ed Integrita Strutturale, 2014, vol. 30, pp. 14-22.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A.D. Wilson: Eng. J., 1990, vol. 27, pp. 98-107.

    Google Scholar 

  6. W. Wood, Publ. No. FHWA-RD-93-015, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Virginia, (1994).

  7. H. Thomas, J. De Back, T.J. Bos, T. Muller, J.J.W. Nibbering, C.J.J.M. Verwey, R. Vonk, Final report of Working Group 1913 of the Netherlands Institute of Welding, Technical Steel Research, Commission of the European Communities, Delft, (1980).

  8. G.S. Schajer, Practical Residual Stress Measurement Methods, 1 st edn. (Wiley, Chichester, 2013), pp. 1-3.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. D. Radaj: Heat effects of welding: temperature field, residual stresses, distortion, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1992, pp. 7-9.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Z.Y. Wei, Y.J. Liu, B. Zhou: Adv. Mat. Res., 2011, vol. 314-316, pp. 437-447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. R. Thiébaud, J. Lebet, Experimental study of residual stresses in thick steel plates, in Proceedings of the Annual Stability Conference Structural Stability Research Council, Texas, USA, 2012, pp. 1–16.

  12. T. Jokiaho, T. Saarinen, S. Santa-Aho, P. Peura, M. Vippola: Key Eng. Mater. 2016, vol. 674, pp. 103-108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. K.W. Andrews: J. Iron Steel Inst., 1965, vol. 203, pp. 721-727.

    Google Scholar 

  14. W. Steven, A.G. Haynes: J. Iron Steel Inst., 1956, vol. 183, pp. 349-359.

    Google Scholar 

  15. S. Kamamoto, T. Nishimori, S. Kinoshita: Mater. Sci. Technol., 1985, vol. 1, pp. 798-804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. D.P. Koistinen, R.E. Marburger: Acta Metall., 1959, vol. 7, pp. 59-60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. SFS-EN 15305, Non-destructive Testing - Test Method for Residual stress analysis by X-ray Diffraction, (2008).

  18. M. Fitzpatrick, A. Fry, P. Holdway, F. Kandil, J. Shackleton, L. Suominen, International Measurement Good Practice Guide No. 52, Crown, (2005).

  19. P.J. Withers, H.K.D.H. Bhadeshia: Mater. Sci. Technol., 2001, Vol. 17, pp. 355-365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The funding for this work was mainly provided by the TUT graduate school. The authors would like to thank Mr. Juha Uusitalo from the University of Oulu for carrying out the Gleeble experiments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Jokiaho.

Additional information

Manuscript submitted March 31, 2017.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jokiaho, T., Laitinen, A., Santa-aho, S. et al. Characterization of Flame Cut Heavy Steel: Modeling of Temperature History and Residual Stress Formation. Metall Mater Trans B 48, 2891–2901 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-017-1090-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-017-1090-x

Keywords

Navigation