Skip to main content
Log in

Simulating the Residual Stress in an A356 Automotive Wheel and Its Impact on Fatigue Life

  • Symposium: Simulation of Aluminum Shape Casting Processing
  • Published:
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Keeping the weight of unsprung rotating components low is critical for fuel efficiency in automobiles; therefore, cast aluminum alloys are the current material of choice for wheels. However, pores formed during solidification can combine with residual stresses and in-service loads to reduce the fatigue life of this safety critical part. In this study, a model of the residual stresses arising from the quench stage of a T6 heat treatment was developed. The resulting predictions were compared to residual strain measurements made on quenched wheels via a strain gage/sectioning technique. The predictions were shown to be sensitive to the alloy’s flow stress behavior, yet no data were available for the temperature- dependent and strain-rate-dependent inelastic behavior of A356 in the as-solutionized condition. Measurements of this behavior were made using a GLEEBLE 3500, and the data were incorporated into the model, significantly improving the correlation between model and experiment. In order to determine the influence of residual stress upon the final fatigue performance of the wheel during service, the change in stress level due to machining was first calculated. The residual stress was then compounded together with a service stress to determine the local stress at all points in the wheel during idealized operation. Finally, the fatigue behavior was predicted using a unified initiation and propagation model based on this local stress and an idealized pore size.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Li P., Lee P.D., Lindley T.C., Maijer D.M., Davis G.R. and Elliott J.C. (2006). Adv. Eng. Mater. 8: 476–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang Q.G., Apelian D. and Lados D.A. (2001). J. Light Met 1: 73–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yi J.Z., Gao Y.X., Lee P.D., Flower H.M. and Lindley T.C. (2003). Metall. Mater. Trans. A 34: 1879–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Maijer D.M., Gao Y., Lee P.D., Lindley T.C. and Fukui T. (2004). Metall. Mater. Trans. A 35: 3275–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Robinson J.S. and Tanner D.A. (2003). Mater. Sci. Technol. 19: 512–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kermanpur A., Tin S., Lee P.D. and McLean M. (2004). JOM 56: 72–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tin S., Lee P.D., Kermanpur A., Rist M. and McLean M. (2005). Metall. Mater. Trans. A 36: 2493–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. European FP5 Programs G5RD-CT-2000-00153, 1999, http://www.eaa. net/downloads/virprojects.pdf.

  9. Gur C.H. and Tekkaya A.E. (2001). Mater. Sci. Eng. A 319–21: 164–69

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tanner D.A. and Robinson J.S. (2000). Exper. Mech. 40: 75–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tanner D.A. and Robinson J.S. (2003). Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 39: 369–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dye D., Conlon K.T. and Reed R.C. (2004). Metall. Mater. Trans. A 35: 1703–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Estey C.M., Cockcroft S.L., Maijer D.M. and Hermesmann C. (2004). Mater. Sci. Eng., A 383: 245–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mills K.C. (2002). Recommended Values of Thermophysical Properties for Selected Commercial Alloys. Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 43–49

    Google Scholar 

  15. C.M. Estey, Master’s Thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, 2004.

  16. Bamberger M. and Prinz B. (1986). Mater. Sci. Technol. 2: 410–15

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yi J.Z., Gao Y.X., Lee P.D. and Lindley T.C. (2004). Mater. Sci. Eng., A 386: 396–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. M.J. Caton, J.W. Jones, and J.E. Allison: in Fatigue Crack Growth Thresholds, Endurance Limits, and Design, ASTM STP 1732, J.C. Newman, Jr. and R.S. Piascik, eds., ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA, 2000, pp. 285-303.

  19. Gao Y.X., Yi J.Z., Lee P.D. and Lindley T.C. (2004). Acta Mater. 52: 5435–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kocks U.F. and Mecking H. (2003). Progr. Mater. Sci. 48: 171–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Osorio W.R., Santos C.A., Quaresma J.M.V. and Garcia A. (2003). J. Mater. Proc. Technol. 143(144): 703–09

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. H.R. Voorhees and J.W. Freeman: Report on the Elevated-Temperature Properties of Aluminum and Magnesium Alloys, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 1960, pp. 217-24.

  23. Lee P.D., Chirazi A., Atwood R.C. and Wang W. (2004). Mater. Sci. Eng., A 365: 57–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee P.D. and Hunt J.D. (1997). Acta Mater. 45: 4155–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. D. Lee.

Additional information

This article is based on a presentation made in the symposium “Simulation of Aluminum Shape Casting Processing: From Design to Mechanical Properties,” which occurred March 12-16, 2006, during the TMS Spring Meeting in San Antonio, Texas, under the auspices of the Computational Materials Science and Engineering Committee, the Process Modeling, Analysis and Control Committee, the Solidification Committee, the Mechanical Behavior of Materials Committee, and the Light Metal Division/Aluminum Committee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, P., Maijer, D.M., Lindley, T.C. et al. Simulating the Residual Stress in an A356 Automotive Wheel and Its Impact on Fatigue Life. Metall Mater Trans B 38, 505–515 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-007-9050-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-007-9050-5

Keywords

Navigation