Abstract
The evolution of the microstructure and texture during annealing of a modified ferritic/martensitic 9Cr-1Mo steel compressed by dynamic plastic deformation (DPD) to a strain of 2.3 has been investigated using transmission electron microscopy and electron backscatter diffraction. It is found that the duplex 〈111〉 + 〈100〉 fiber texture formed by DPD is transformed during annealing to a dominant 〈111〉 fiber texture, and that crystallites of the 〈111〉 component have an advantage during both nucleation and growth. Detailed characterization of the microstructural morphology, and estimation of the stored energies in 〈111〉- and 〈100〉-oriented regions in deformed and annealed samples, as well as investigations of the growth of recrystallizing grains, are used to analyze the annealing behavior. It is concluded that recrystallization in the given material occurs by a combination of oriented nucleation and oriented growth.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Most metals and alloys are subjected to thermomechanical processing, which includes plastic deformation and annealing in various combinations. Annealing after plastic deformation may result in static recrystallization, which is frequently accompanied by changes in the crystallographic texture. For body-centered cubic (bcc) iron-based systems, the deformation texture after compression is dominated by 〈100〉 and 〈111〉 fiber texture components aligned with the compression axis (CA), and it is generally found that the 〈100〉 component weakens during recrystallization, whereas the 〈111〉 fiber texture strengthens significantly.[1–4]
In a previous study[3] on a modified ferritic/martensitic 9Cr-1Mo steel where samples were deformed to a strain of 0.5 either by quasistatic compression (QSC) or by dynamic plastic deformation (DPD),[5,6] it has been found that DPD resulted in a stronger 〈111〉 + 〈100〉 fiber texture and in faster recrystallization than QSC. The faster recrystallization was attributed to a finer boundary spacing and, therefore, a higher energy stored during DPD as compared to QSC.[3] At a strain of 0.5, the boundary spacings measured by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) in the DPD samples and the QSC samples were in the submicrometer range, 190 nm and 240 nm, respectively.
The aim of the present work is to investigate recrystallization in a sample compressed by DPD to a much higher strain (ε = 2.3) with a finer boundary spacing in the deformed state, and thus with a significantly higher stored energy and driving force for recovery and recrystallization. A preliminary analysis has shown that recrystallization in this material takes place in a highly heterogeneous manner.[7] It is therefore of interest to link the variations in the deformed microstructure to the recovery and recrystallization taking place in different regions. A spatially resolved analysis of the stored energy distribution after deformation as well as of the changes in this distribution during subsequent annealing is conducted based on EBSD data. In addition, orientation relationships both in the deformed microstructure and between recrystallizing grains and their recovered environment are analyzed in this study. Finally, the EBSD analysis is complemented by a TEM characterization of the subgrain morphology in the deformed and recovered conditions. This analysis, which takes into account local variations in the deformed microstructure, is considered essential for improved understanding and modeling of annealing mechanisms.
2 Experimental
The modified 9Cr-1Mo steel (Table I) sample used in this study was received in the form of a hot extruded rod normalized at 1313 K (1040 °C) for 1.4 hours, tempered at 1043 K (770 °C) for 5 hours and finally stress relieved at 1013 K (740 °C). In the microstructure obtained after this treatment, coarse M23C6 particles were observed at prior austenite grain boundaries and martensite lath boundaries, while small carbonitride particles were distributed randomly in the matrix.[3,7] The average subgrain size and the average distance between high angle boundaries (HABs) in this as-received condition was 0.7 and 2.4 µm, respectively.[3,7]
Cylindrical specimens with the CA aligned along the extrusion axis of the as-received rod, and a size of 9 mm in diameter and 12 mm in height were machined for DPD. The specimens were compressed at room temperature to an equivalent (von Mises) strain of 2.3 in five steps at strain rates of 102 to 103 s−1.
The deformed material was annealed in air at different temperatures between 823 K (550 °C) and 973 K (700 °C) for 1 hour. Another series of samples was obtained by isothermal annealing at 948 K (675 °C) with annealing times in the range between 15 and 90 minutes. In addition, one sample was annealed in vacuum at 923 K (650 °C) for 1 hour, followed by EBSD characterization of randomly chosen regions. This sample was then repeatedly annealed at 923 K (650 °C) for 1 hour in vacuum, and the same regions were inspected again without repolishing.
The deformed and annealed material was investigated in the central part of the samples, in sections perpendicular to the compression plane. Samples were investigated using a JEOL 2000 FX transmission electron microscope operating at 200 kV and a Zeiss Supra 35 field emission gun scanning electron microscope equipped with a Channel 5 EBSD system from HKL Technology. A step size of 20 nm was chosen for studying the deformed microstructure by EBSD. Larger step sizes (50 to 200 nm) were used for texture measurements and for orientation mapping of the annealed samples. The EBSD indexing rate for the sample after DPD was 74 pct. For the annealed samples the indexing rate was at least 85 pct. Because of the limited angular resolution of the EBSD technique,[8,9] misorientations less than 2 deg were not considered in the orientation maps. Therefore, the boundary spacing measured from the EBSD data was defined as the mean distance between boundaries with misorientation angles θ greater than 2 deg (d θ>2deg). Boundaries with misorientations between 2 and 15 deg were classified as low angle boundaries (LABs). Boundaries with misorientations above 15 deg were classified as HABs. Fractions of different texture components were calculated within 10 deg from the exact 〈111〉 and 〈100〉 fibers.
Recrystallized grains were defined using the approach described by Wu and Juul Jensen,[10] where a grain should satisfy several criteria to be classified as recrystallized: (i) the in-grain pixel-to-pixel misorientation is below 2 deg; (ii) the equivalent circular diameter (ECD) is above 3 μm; and (iii) the grain is at least partly surrounded by HABs. The volume number density of recrystallized grains was determined as N V = N A/ECD from the area number density N A of these grains. The EBSD data were also used to determine the boundary area per unit volume, which was applied to estimate the energy stored[11,12] both in deformed and recovered microstructures. The specific boundary energy of LABs was calculated from the Read–Shockley equation.[13,14] The specific boundary energy of HABs was assumed to be 617 mJ/m2.[15] Vickers hardness was measured using a load of 1 kg with a 10-second dwell time.
3 Results
3.1 Deformation Structure After Compression by DPD
A lamellar structure with extended planar boundaries aligned almost perpendicular to the CA and a high dislocation density within elongated subgrains is observed after compression by DPD (see Figure 1). The average spacing between the lamellar boundaries measured using TEM is 98 nm.
Analysis of selected area diffraction patterns and the EBSD data indicate that lamellae of the 〈111〉 or 〈100〉 fiber texture components are arranged in alternating bands (see Figures 1 and 2(a)) with an average width of 0.3 µm. The boundary spacing d θ>2deg measured along the CA within the 〈111〉 bands is slightly finer than that within the 〈100〉 bands, 110 and 116 nm, respectively. It should be noted that these values do not take into account boundaries between the 〈111〉 and 〈100〉 bands. The average d θ>2deg along the CA calculated taking into account all boundaries identified in the orientation maps is 110 nm. The average spacing between HABs determined from the EBSD data is 200 nm. No appreciable difference in the frequency and the spatial distribution of particles is found in the regions of 〈111〉 or 〈100〉 texture components. The two texture components form a duplex 〈111〉 + 〈100〉 fiber texture, where the 〈100〉 component is somewhat stronger than the 〈111〉 component (see Figure 2(b)).
3.2 Evolution During Isochronal Annealing
The microstructural evolution during annealing at different temperatures for 1 hour is shown in Figures 3 and 4. It is seen that at temperatures below 923 K (650 °C), the microstructure evolves primarily by subgrain coarsening, though a number of small (between 1 and 3 µm) strain-free recrystallization nuclei are present after annealing at 873 K (600 °C) and 898 K (625 °C) with a total area fraction of 1 and 4 pct, respectively. Whereas most subgrains become less elongated during the coarsening, regions with highly elongated subgrains, similar to those in the as-deformed material, are still observed in the recovered microstructure (Figures 4(a) and (b)). TEM diffraction analysis shows that the regions with highly elongated subgrains belong to the 〈100〉 component (see Figure 4(a)).
The coarsening results in significant softening of the material (Figure 5(a)). As expected, the boundary spacing increases with increasing annealing temperature. The average boundary spacing measured in the recovered regions within the 〈111〉 bands remains slightly less than that within the 〈100〉 bands only at temperatures up to 873 K (600 °C) (see Figure 5(b)). After annealing at 923 K (625 °C) and 923 K (650 °C) there is almost no difference in the boundary spacing within the recovered regions of the two texture components. After annealing at 948 K (675 °C), the spacing within recovered 〈111〉 bands exceeds that within 〈100〉 bands (Figure 5(b)).
No significant change in texture is observed for temperatures below 923 K (650 °C) (Figure 6). Annealing at 923 K (650 °C) for 1 hour results in pronounced recrystallization (see Figures 3(c) and 4(c) and (d)) with an area fraction of recrystallized material f Rex = 12 pct. Most of the recrystallizing grains in Figure 3(c) belong to the 〈111〉 component, and the intensity of the 〈111〉 component increases at the expense of the 〈100〉 component (see Figure 6(c)). For the higher temperature of 948 K (675 °C), f Rex increases to 78 pct. After annealing at 973 K (700 °C) for 1 hour the material is almost fully recrystallized (f Rex = 99 pct, see Figure 3(d)). The texture of this almost fully recrystallized sample is dominated by the 〈111〉 component (see Figure 6(d)), whereas the 〈100〉 component is very weak.
3.3 Evolution During Isothermal Annealing
For a statistical characterization of both recovery and recrystallization during isothermal annealing, a temperature of 948 K (675 °C) and annealing durations in the range from 15 to 90 minutes were chosen. In addition to this statistical analysis, several regions containing 16 recrystallizing grains were investigated using the EBSD technique after 1 hour at 923 K (650 °C), where the same regions were reexamined after additional annealing at 923 K (650 °C) for 1 hour without repolishing to identify migrating boundaries at the early stage of recrystallization.
3.3.1 Statistical characterization of changes during annealing at 948 K (675 °C)
Orientation maps from different regions of the material annealed at 948 K (675 °C) are shown in Figure 7. It is apparent that a number of small (between 3 and 10 µm) recrystallizing grains are present in the microstructure already after 15 minutes of annealing at 948 K (675 °C) (Figure 7(a)). The area fraction of the recrystallizing grains in this condition is 4 pct, and most of these grains have orientations of the 〈111〉 component. The hardness is reduced from 365 HV1 in the DPD sample to 243 HV1 after 15 minutes of annealing (Figure 8). Further annealing increases the number, average size and the area fraction of recrystallizing grains, and leads to a further softening of the material (see Figures 7, 8 and 9).
Recrystallization occurs heterogeneously, with recrystallizing grain clustering in the form of bands perpendicular to the CA (Figure 7(b)). Figure 9(a) indicates that for all annealing durations the number density of the 〈111〉 recrystallizing grains is much greater than the corresponding number density of the 〈100〉 grains. Additionally, the average size of the 〈111〉 recrystallizing grains is significantly larger than that of the 〈100〉 grains (see Figure 9(b)). For instance, the average recrystallized grain sizes after annealing for 30 minutes (total f Rex = 26 pct) are 6.5 and 3.7 μm for the 〈111〉 grains and the 〈100〉 grains, respectively. After 90 minutes at 948 K (675 °C) (total f Rex = 81 pct), the average recrystallized grain sizes increase to 9.0 and 5.7 μm for the 〈111〉 and 〈100〉 components, respectively. The larger average size and higher frequency of the recrystallizing 〈111〉 grains result in a larger area fraction of such grains (see Figure 9(c)).
3.3.2 Monitoring of changes during annealing at 923 K (650 °C) in the same-region experiment
Examples of the orientation maps representing the partially recrystallized microstructure obtained after annealing at 923 K (650 °C) for 1 hour and examined again after an additional hour of annealing at the same temperature are given in Figure 10. In this figure, “I” and “II” refer to identical areas analyzed after 1 and 2 hours of annealing at 923 K (650 °C). Numbers 1 to 6 mark six 〈111〉 grains growing predominantly into the recovered 〈111〉 matrix. Therefore, boundaries between these grains and the 〈111〉 matrix are referred here to as 〈111〉/〈111〉 boundaries. It is evident from Figure 10 that migrating 〈111〉/〈111〉 boundaries are mostly HABs. Although boundaries between 〈111〉 grains and 〈100〉 matrix (〈111〉/〈100〉 boundaries) are also HABs, these boundaries mostly do not migrate during the additional annealing treatment.
Misorientation distributions for all boundaries between the 16 recrystallizing 〈111〉 grains, identified in this same-region experiment, and the recovered matrix of the 〈111〉 or 〈100〉 components are presented in Figures 11(a) and (b). It is seen that there is a significant difference between the misorientations of 〈111〉/〈111〉 and 〈111〉/〈100〉 boundaries: for the former the dominant misorientation axis is 〈111〉, while for the latter the highest concentration of misorientation axes is near 〈110〉. In addition, the angular distribution of the 〈111〉/〈111〉 boundaries is much broader than that of the 〈111〉/〈100〉 boundaries. These differences are consistent with theoretical distributions describing misorientations between 〈111〉-oriented grains and the 〈111〉 or 〈100〉 fiber texture components.
Figure 11(c) shows the distribution of misorientations only across boundaries that actually have migrated during the additional annealing treatment. This distribution includes all misorientations between a growing grain and each pixel in the recovered matrix consumed during the additional annealing step (see Reference 16 for more details of the calculation approach). The distribution is rather broad, where the majority of boundary misorientations can be described as 20 to 60 deg 〈111〉. The fraction of 20 to 30 deg 〈111〉 boundaries, which have been previously found to form preferentially between the matrix and recrystallizing grains in some rolled bcc single crystals,[17,18] is 22 pct (calculated allowing a deviation of 10 deg from the exact 25 deg 〈111〉 misorientation). The fraction of 27 deg 〈110〉 boundaries, typically considered to be high mobility boundaries in bcc steels,[19,20] is only 4.6 pct.
4 Discussion
4.1 Structural Refinement During DPD
DPD has previously been shown to result in more pronounced structural refinement than deformation at low strain rates, which has been attributed to a higher density of dislocations forming more finely spaced dislocation boundaries than in materials after QSC.[3,21,22] Although the microstructure of the QSC sample deformed to a strain of 2.3 has not been characterized in the present work, the hardness data available after this strain indicate that the QSC sample is considerably softer (348 HV1) than the DPD sample (365 HV1), which is consistent with earlier observations for the samples deformed to a lower strain[3] and which suggests that the structural refinement by DPD is more effective than that by QSC also at a strain of 2.3.
Compared to a previous study of the present material DPD-processed to a strain of 0.5,[3,7] where a dislocation cell structure was observed to have an average boundary spacing of 0.2 µm, the sample studied in the present work contains a much more refined lamellar structure with a boundary spacing of only 0.1 µm. It is therefore apparent that during DPD the initial tempered martensite structure evolves first to a typical cell structure at low strains and then to a nanoscale lamellar structure as the strain increases. The lamellar structure observed at a strain of 2.3 is arranged in alternating 〈111〉 and 〈100〉 bands with an average width of 0.3 µm. The HAB spacing is smaller—approximately 0.2 µm, which is similar to the expected grain thickness (0.24 µm) after a strain 2.3 (note that the HAB spacing prior to DPD was 2.4 µm[3]).
Considering the differences between the regions of the different texture components, it is found that the 〈111〉 regions are characterized by a smaller boundary spacing and, therefore, have a higher stored energy than the 〈100〉 regions. Calculations based on the EBSD data show that the energy stored in the form of boundaries is indeed greater in the 〈111〉 regions than in the 〈100〉 regions, 6.0 and 4.2 MJ/m3, respectively. This considerable difference in the stored energy for the bands of the different texture components is attributed to the difference in their Taylor factors, where M 〈111〉 > M 〈100〉,[23] leading to an increased slip activity in the 〈111〉 regions and hence a larger density of dislocations forming deformation-induced boundaries.
4.2 Recovery
Recovery in the modified 9Cr-1Mo steel is accompanied by coarsening of the deformed microstructure driven by the reduction in the boundary energy. Calculations based on the EBSD data show that the stored energy is significantly reduced during coarsening (see Figure 12), and that the reduction rate is higher in the 〈111〉 regions, for which the initial stored energy was greater than that for the 〈100〉 regions. This observation is in agreement with our recent results obtained on PM2000 annealed after DPD[4] and with findings obtained on commercial purity aluminum annealed after heavy rolling,[24] where more pronounced recovery was observed in high-energy texture bands compared to low-energy texture bands. Considering the contributions of HABs and LABs separately (see insets in Figure 12), it is clear that the different reduction in the stored energy for the different regions is predominantly caused by differences in the loss of LABs.
The lower driving force for coarsening in the 〈100〉 bands in the DPD-processed steel may explain the presence of the retained lamellar structure within the 〈100〉 regions after annealing at 873 K (600 °C) for 1 hour (Figure 4(a) and (b)), whereas no such structures are seen within the 〈111〉 regions. A result of the more pronounced recovery within the 〈111〉 regions is that the difference between the stored boundary energy in the 〈111〉 and 〈100〉 regions is reduced significantly prior to recrystallization.
Microstructural analysis indicates that pronounced recrystallization takes place when the stored boundary energy within both 〈111〉 and 〈100〉 regions is rather similar (see Figure 12). It should however be noted that the very first recrystallization nuclei appear when the difference in the stored energy between these regions is still appreciable. For example, in the microstructure after 1 hour at 873 K (600 °C), where the nuclei occupy 1 pct of the area, the stored energy within the 〈111〉 and 〈100〉 bands is 2.7 and 2.0 MJ/m3, respectively.
4.3 Recrystallization
During recrystallization 〈111〉 nuclei develop within the 〈111〉 texture bands, while 〈100〉 nuclei are observed within the 〈100〉 bands, as seen, for instance, in Figure 7(a). These observations are consistent with the standard concept of nucleation, i.e., nucleation is closely related to the microstructure in which it occurs by growth from preexisting subgrains.[15] Nevertheless, the number of the 〈111〉-oriented nuclei is found to be significantly greater than the number of the 〈100〉-oriented nuclei. Altogether, after annealing at 948 K (675 °C) for 1 hour, 59 and 15 pct of all nuclei belong to the 〈111〉 and 〈100〉 fiber texture components, respectively. These relative frequencies are larger than the orientation probabilities for the texture components expected for a bcc material with a random texture. The increased relative frequencies of the 〈111〉 and 〈100〉 nuclei result from the strong duplex texture, with the 〈111〉 and 〈100〉 components representing 37 and 49 pct of all orientations, respectively. If nucleation of the 〈111〉- and 〈100〉-oriented grains were simply related to these area fractions in the deformation texture (which does not significantly change during recovery), the relative frequencies of the 〈111〉 and 〈100〉 nuclei would have been similar to the fractions of the 〈111〉 and 〈100〉 components in the deformation texture. The observation that the relative frequency of the 〈111〉-oriented nuclei is much higher than the area fraction of the 〈111〉 deformation matrix implies that nucleation of the 〈111〉 grains is preferential. Combined with the fact that the frequency of 〈100〉-oriented nuclei is less than the area fraction of the 〈100〉 matrix, this suggests that nucleation in the DPD-processed steel is orientation dependent.
Oriented nucleation has previously been described as the key process determining recrystallization textures in iron and bcc steels deformed by rolling.[2,25–29] According to Every and Hatherly,[29] who studied texture evolution during recrystallization in a warm-rolled low-carbon steel, preferential nucleation of 〈111〉//ND-oriented grains is due to a higher stored energy in the deformed microstructure of this crystallographic orientation. Significant effects of the difference in the stored energy between regions having different orientations on recovery and recrystallization in rolled steels have also been reported by other researchers.[30–35] Our analysis of the orientation-dependent distribution of the stored energy in the DPD-processed material is generally consistent with those obtained on the rolled bcc materials: after deformation the stored energy calculated for the 〈111〉-oriented regions is much higher than that for the 〈100〉-oriented regions (Figure 12). However, as mentioned in Subsection IV–B, the difference in the stored energy between the 〈111〉 and 〈100〉 regions is significantly reduced during recovery. It is therefore apparent that the preferential nucleation of the 〈111〉 grains may not be rationalized solely based on the large difference in the stored energy in the as-deformed state. It is proposed that the difference in morphological characteristics of recovered subgrains of different texture components (see Figure 4(a)) may also play a role, and that nuclei develop more easily within the almost equiaxed recovered structures of the 〈111〉 component than within the lamellar structures of the 〈100〉 component having a similar stored energy.
To analyze whether the growth of recrystallized grains in the present material is also sensitive to the crystallographic orientation, growth rates for a series of specimens partially recrystallized at 948 K (675 °C) were analyzed using the extended Cahn–Hagel approach,[36] which enabled the calculation of impingement-corrected average growth rates for grains of different orientations. The growth rates obtained using this approach reveal that during the early stage of recrystallization the 〈111〉 grains grow significantly (up to 5 times) faster than the 〈100〉 grains (see Figure 13) and that the difference in the growth rates between the 〈111〉 and 〈100〉 grains diminishes with increasing annealing time.
The different growth rates cannot be attributed to the effects of particles as their frequency appeared similar in the 〈111〉 and 〈100〉 regions. Therefore, boundary pinning by particles[7] in these regions is expected to be similar. The oriented growth of the 〈111〉 grains can also not be attributed to a few specific misorientations, such as ~27 deg 〈110〉 or 20 to 30 deg 〈111〉, generally considered favorable for growth of recrystallizing grains in bcc metals and steels. In contrast, the migrating boundaries in the annealed DPD sample are characterized by a large variety of misorientations (see Figure 11(c)), which is consistent with the data obtained by Hutchinson and Ryde[26] for rolled bcc steels. It is suggested that the different morphology of the recovered 〈111〉 and 〈100〉 subgrains may affect the growth rate of recrystallizing grains. If a recrystallization boundary migrates into a deformation structure with equiaxed subgrains, an almost constant driving force in all directions is expected. However, if such a boundary migrates into a lamellar structure, the driving force is anisotropic. In this case, the migration rate is different in different directions and particularly low for segments of the recrystallization boundary, which are parallel to the lamellar boundaries, but at some distance from them. This may explain why 〈111〉 grains grow more rapidly into the equiaxed 〈111〉 regions than 〈100〉 grains growing into the lamellar 〈100〉 regions in the beginning of recrystallization. Apparently, the significantly faster initial growth of the 〈111〉 grains, fully or partially surrounded by HABs (see Figure 11(c)), results in a larger final size of these grains and promotes the very strong 〈111〉 recrystallization texture.
5 Conclusions
Changes in the microstructure and texture during annealing of a modified 9Cr-1Mo steel compressed via dynamic plastic deformation (DPD) at a high strain rate have been studied using both TEM and EBSD techniques with special attention to local microscale processes. The following conclusions are obtained from this study.
-
1.
DPD to a strain of 2.3 results in a duplex 〈111〉 + 〈100〉 fiber texture and a lamellar structure with an average spacing of about 100 nm between lamellar boundaries. Estimation of the stored energy based on the EBSD data show that in the as-deformed condition, the stored energy within 〈111〉 regions is significantly higher than that within 〈100〉 regions.
-
2.
During annealing the microstructure first recovers and coarsens, which causes softening and reduction in the stored energy. This reduction is found to be faster within the 〈111〉 regions than within the 〈100〉 regions. As a result, the stored energy within the recovered structures of the two texture components becomes quite similar prior to the onset of pronounced recrystallization. In the recovered microstructure, 〈111〉-oriented subgrains are almost equiaxed, whereas highly elongated subgrains can still be found in the 〈100〉 regions.
-
3.
Examination of samples annealed at different temperatures for 1 hour reveals that small recrystallization nuclei appear at 873 K (600 °C), whereas recrystallized grains greater than 3 µm are observed at temperatures of 923 K (650 °C) and above. At 948 K (675 °C) the microstructure is partially recrystallized already after 15 minutes annealing. Recrystallizing grains of the 〈111〉 component have an advantage during both nucleation and growth. Consequently, both oriented nucleation and oriented growth contribute to the strong 〈111〉 recrystallization texture development.
-
4.
Considering that the difference in the stored energy between the recovered 〈111〉 and 〈100〉 regions is small at the onset of pronounced recrystallization, it is suggested that the preferential nucleation of the 〈111〉 grains is not only because of the higher energy stored in the 〈111〉 bands, but may also be favored by the almost equiaxed shape of recovered 〈111〉 subgrains as compared to recovered 〈100〉 regions which retained the lamellar structure with extended planar boundaries. It is suggested that the different morphology of the recovered 〈111〉 and 〈100〉 microstructures may also affect the growth rates leading to preferred growth of the 〈111〉 grains.
-
5.
Analysis of migrating boundaries of the rapidly growing 〈111〉 grains indicates that the distribution of misorientation angles for these boundaries is broad and thus not limited to any special misorientation generally considered favorable for growth of recrystallizing grains.
References
H. Hu: Texture 1974, vol. 1, pp. 233-258.
I. L. Dillamore, H. Katoh and K. Haslam: Texture 1974, vol. 1, pp. 151-156.
Z. B. Zhang, O. V. Mishin, N. R. Tao and W. Pantleon: Mater. Sci. Technol. 2015, vol. 31, pp. 715-721.
Z.B. Zhang, N.R. Tao, O.V. Mishin and W. Pantleon: J. Mater. Sci. 2016, vol. 51, pp. 5545-5555.
Y. S. Li, N. R. Tao and K. Lu: Acta Mater. 2008, vol. 56, pp. 230-241.
F. K. Yan, G. Z. Liu, N. R. Tao and K. Lu: Acta Mater. 2012, vol. 60, pp. 1059-1071.
Z. B. Zhang, O. V. Mishin, N. R. Tao and W. Pantleon: J. Nucl. Mater. 2015, vol. 458, pp. 64-69.
F. J. Humphreys: J. Mater. Sci. 2001, vol. 36, pp. 3833-3854.
O. V. Mishin, A. Godfrey and L. Ostensson: Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2006, vol. 37A, pp. 489-496.
G. L. Wu and D. Juul Jensen: Mater. Charact. 2008, vol. 59, pp. 794-800.
A. Godfrey, N. Hansen and D. Juul Jensen: Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2007, vol. 38A, pp. 2329-2339.
A. Godfrey, W. Q. Cao, N. Hansen and Q. Liu: Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2005, vol. 36A, pp. 2371-2378.
W. T. Read and W. Shockley: Phys. Rev. 1950, vol. 78, pp. 275-289.
W. T. Read: Dislocation in Solids, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 155-172, 1953.
F.J. Humphreys and M. Hatherly: Recrystallization and Related Annealing Phenomena. Elsevier, Oxford, 2004.
Y.B. Zhang, A. Godfrey, Q. Liu, W. Liu and D. Juul Jensen: Acta Mater. 2009, vol. 57, pp.2631-2639.
J. O. Stiegler, C. K. H. Dubose R. E. Reed and C. J. McHargue: Acta Metall. 1963, vol. 11, pp. 851-860.
R. A. Vandermeer and W. B. Snyder Jr.: Metall. Trans. A 1979, vol. 10, pp. 1031-1044.
K. Verbeken, L. Kestens, M.D. Nave: Acta Mater. 2005, vol. 53, pp.2675-2682.
M. Sánchez-Araiza, S. Godet, P. J. Jacques and J. J. Jonas: Acta Mater. 2006, vol. 54, pp. 3085-3093.
F. Huang, N. R. Tao and K. Lu: J. Mater. Sci. Techn. 2011, vol. 27, pp. 1-7.
Z. P. Luo, O. V. Mishin, Y. B. Zhang, H. W. Zhang and K. Lu: Scr. Mater. 2012, vol. 66, pp. 335-338.
J. M. Rosenberg and H. R. Piehler: Metall. Trans. 1971, vol. 2, pp. 257-259.
Q. Xing, X. Huang and N. Hansen: Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2006, vol. 37A, pp. 1311-1322.
I. L. Dillamore, C. J. E. Smith and T. W. Watson: Metal Science 1967, vol. 1, pp. 49-54.
W.B. Hutchinson and L. Ryde: in 16th Risø International Symposium Materials Science, N. Hansen, D. Juul Jensen, Y.L. Liu, and B. Ralph, eds., Risø National Lab, Roskilde, 1995. p. 105.
I. Samajdar, B. Verlinden, P. Van Houtte and D. Vanderschueren: Mater. Sci. Eng. A 1997, vol. 238, pp. 343-350.
J. T. Park and J. A. Szpunar: Acta Mater. 2003, vol. 51, pp. 3037-3051.
R. L. Every and M. Hatherly: Texture 1974, vol. 1, pp. 183-194.
W.B. Hutchinson: Int. Met. Rev. 29 (1984) 25-42.
D. Raabe: in 16th Risø International Symposium Materials Science, N. Hansen, D. Juul Jensen, Y.L. Liu, and B. Ralph, eds., Risø National Lab, Roskilde, 1995.
D. Raabe: Steel Research 1995, vol. 66, pp. 222-229
M. Oyarzábal, A. Martínez-De-Guerenu and I. Gutiérrez: Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2008, vol. 485, pp. 200-209.
R. Khatirkar, B. Vadavadagi, S. K. Shekhawat, A. Haldar and I. Samajdar: ISIJ Int. 2012, vol. 52, pp. 884-893.
A.A. Gazder, M. Sánchez-Araiza, J.J. Jonas and E.V. Pereloma: Acta Mater 2011, vol. 59, pp. 4847-4865.
D. Juul Jensen: Scr. Metall. Mater. 1992, vol. 27, pp. 533-538.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the support from the Sino-Danish Center for Education and Research. The authors also gratefully acknowledge the support from the Danish National Research Foundation (Grant No. DNRF86-5) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51261130091) to the Danish-Chinese Center for Nanometals. The authors would like to thank Professor A. Godfrey and Dr. F.X. Lin for helpful discussions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Manuscript submitted January 19, 2016.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, Z., Zhang, Y., Mishin, O.V. et al. Microstructural Analysis of Orientation-Dependent Recovery and Recrystallization in a Modified 9Cr-1Mo Steel Deformed by Compression at a High Strain Rate. Metall Mater Trans A 47, 4682–4693 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-016-3626-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-016-3626-0