Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Inclusion-controlled fatigue properties of 1800 MPA-class spring steels

  • Published:
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fatigue tests were conducted on a series of 1800 MPa-class spring steels whose fatigue properties were inclusion controlled. The fatigue tests were conducted on billets and on hot-rolled bars, taking into account the elongation of the oxide-type composite inclusions that were deformed during hot rolling, i.e., controlled inclusions. Anisotropy of the fatigue properties due to the slender shape of the elongated inclusions was also discussed. Fatigue tests were then conducted for both the rolling direction (RD) and transverse direction (TD) in the case of the billets. The fatigue test results in the RD showed a slight difference between billets and bars. The inclusions that were deformed during hot rolling were sufficiently elongated, even for the billet specimens, and differences in the effective inclusion sizes between the billets and their hot-rolled bars for the RD were small. However, there were marked differences in fatigue strength between the RD and TD in the billet specimens: the fatigue strength was almost half in the TD due to the presence of fish-eye fractures originating in large and slender MnS inclusions. In these fatigue tests, the two types of deformable inclusions revealed remarkably different effects on fatigue strength: the deformable oxide-type inclusions never caused fish-eye fracture, although the MnS inclusions found in the billets were extremely detrimental to fatigue strength when stress was applied in the TD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Y. Murakami: Metal Fatigue: Effects of Small Defects and Nonmetallic Inclusions, Elsevier, London, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Nishijima and K. Kanazawa: Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 1999, vol. 22, pp. 601–07.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. K.J. Miller and W.J. O’Donnell: Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 1999, vol. 22, pp. 545–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Y. Murakami, M. Takada, and T. Toriyarna: Int. J. Fatigue, 1998, vol. 16 (9), pp. 661–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Y. Furuya, S. Matsuoka, T. Abe, and K. Yamaguchi: Scripta Mater., 2002, vol. 46 (2), pp. 157–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Y. Furuya, T. Abe, and S. Matsuoka: Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 2003, vol. 26, pp. 641–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Y. Murakami, T. Toriyama, K. Isubota, and K. Furuyama: ASTM STP1327, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  8. T. Abe, Y. Furuya, and S. Matsuoka: Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 2004, vol. 27 (2), pp. 159–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. T. Abe and S. Matsuoka: Trans. JSSR, 2001, vol. 46, pp. 19–25 (in Japanese).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. N.M.A. Eid and P.F. Thomason: Acta. Metall., 1979, vol. 79, pp. 1239–49.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Mormot, B. Heritier, and J.Y. Gogne: ASTM STP987, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  12. L.O. Uhrus: Special Report No. 77, Iron and Steel Institute, 1963, pp. 104–09.

  13. D. Brooksbank and K.W. Andrews: J. Iron Steel Inst., 1972, vol. 210, pp. 246–55.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Y. Furuya and S. Matsuoka: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2002, vol. 33A, pp. 3421–31.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. L.H. Donnel: in Stress Concentration Factors, R.E. Peterson, ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1974, p. 223.

    Google Scholar 

  16. K. Toyama and Y. Yamarnoto: Proc. Fatigue ’90, 1990, vol. 1, pp. 343–48.

    Google Scholar 

  17. T. Ohshiro, I. Ikeda, H. Matsuyama, S. Okushima, Y. Oki, and N. Ibaraki: Kobelco Technol. Rev., 1987, vol. 2, pp. 36–40.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. T. Takahashi: J. Jpn. Soc. Technol. Plast., 1989, vol. 30, pp. 1239–44 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  19. ASTM Standard, E45, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 1997.

  20. E.J. Gumbel: Statistics of Extremes, Columbia University Press, New York, NY, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  21. JIS Z 2273, JIS Handbook 1-1, Japanese Standards Association, Tokyo, 1997, pp. 178–82 (in Japanese).

  22. Y. Ono, T. Yuri, H. Sumiyoshi, S. Matsuoka, and T. Ogata: Mater. Trans., 2003, vol. 44, pp. 1702–05.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Y. Furuya, S. Matsuoka, and I. Abe: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2003. vol. 34A, pp. 2517–26.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Y. Murakami, T. Nomoto, and T. Ueda: Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 1999, vol. 22, pp. 581–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. N. Nagashima, S. Matsuoka, and K. Miyahara: Trans. Jpn. Soc. Mech. Eng., 1999, Ser. A, vol. 65 (631), pp. 477–82 (in Japanese).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Furuya, Y., Abe, T. & Matsuoka, S. Inclusion-controlled fatigue properties of 1800 MPA-class spring steels. Metall Mater Trans A 35, 3737–3744 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-004-0279-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-004-0279-1

Keywords

Navigation