Abstract
Summary
Some questions remain on the relationship between smoking and bone health. Detailed analyses of the relationship between smoking and BMD are presented, essentially ruling out non-linear associations as an explanation for inconsistent results in the literature.
Introduction
To provide comprehensive multiple regression and dose-response analyses of the association between smoking behavior variables and bone health as assessed by radiologically determined bone mineral density in NHANES III.
Methods
Analyzes of a representative cross-sectional survey of the noninstitutionalized population of the USA. Self-reported smoking behavior and bone mineral density of 14,510 participants were analyzed using survey design-based multiple linear regression modeling. Dose-response patterns were analyzed using restricted cubic spline regression.
Results
Femoral neck bone mineral density in current smokers was numerically lower than in never smokers, but this was not statistically significant after controlling for confounders. In former smokers, bone mineral density T scores were 0.064 units higher for every 10 years of abstinence, with little impact of confounder adjustment. Spline regression revealed no relevant non-linearity in the associations studied.
Conclusions
Non-linearity is an unlikely explanation for inconsistent results in the literature on smoking and bone mineral density. Further and especially longitudinal studies of the complex relationship smoking with bone health would be particularly important given the still substantial prevalence of smoking in an aging global population.
References
Abrahamsen B, Brask-Lindemann D, Rubin KH, Schwarz P (2014) A review of lifestyle, smoking and other modifiable risk factors for osteoporotic fractures. BoneKEy Reports 3:574
Benson BW, Shulman JD (2005) Inclusion of tobacco exposure as a predictive factor for decreased bone mineral content. Nicotine Tob Res 7(5):719–724
Breitling LP (2015) Calcium intake and bone mineral density as an example of non-linearity and threshold analysis. Osteoporos Int 26(4):1271–1281
Breitling LP (2015) Smoking as an effect modifier of the association of calcium intake with bone mineral density. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 100(2):626–635
Breitling LP (2015) Liver enzymes and bone mineral density in the general population. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 100(10):3832–3840
Callreus M, McGuigan F, Akesson K (2013) Adverse effects of smoking on peak bone mass may be attenuated by higher body mass index in young female smokers. Calcif Tissue Int 93(6):517–525
Carey JJ, Delaney MF (2010) T-scores and Z-scores. Clin Rev Bone Miner Metab 8:113–121
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (accessed September 9, 2014). National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey: NCHS research ethics review board (ERB) approval (last updated 2012). http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/irba98.htm
Grainge MJ, CAC C, Cliffe SJ, CED C, Hosking DJ, Nottingham EPIC Study Group (1998) Cigarette smoking, alcohol and caffeine consumption, and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 8:355–363
Harrell FE (2001) Regression modeling strategies: with applications to linear models, logistic regression and survival analysis. Springer, New York
Hermann AP, Brot C, Gram J, Kolthoff N, Mosekilde L (2000) Premenopausal smoking and bone density in 2015 perimenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res 15(4):780–787
Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Johansson H, De Laet C, Eisman JA, Fujiwara S, Kroger H, EV MC, Mellstrom D, Melton LJ, Pols H, Reeve J, Silman A, Tenenhouse A (2005) Smoking and fracture risk: a meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 16:155–162
Lumley T (2004) Analysis of complex survey samples. J Stat Softw 9(1):1–19
Myong JP, Kim HR, Choi SE, Koo JW (2013) Dose-related effect of urinary cotinine levels on bone mineral density among Korean females. Osteoporos Int 24:1339–1346
National Center for Health Statistics (1994) Plan and operation of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–94. Vital Health Stat 1(32):1–407
Oncken C, Prestwood K, Kleppinger A, Wang Y, Cooney J, Raisz L (2006) Impact of smoking cessation on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women. J Women's Health 15(10):1141–1150
R Development Core Team (2016) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org
Sneve M, Emaus N, Joakimsen RM, Jorde R (2008) The association between serum parathyroid hormone and bone mineral density, and the impact of smoking: the Tromso study. Eur J Endocrinol 158:401–409
Tamaki J, Iki M, Fujita Y, Kouda K, Yura A, Kadowaki E, Sato Y, Moon JS, Tomioka K, Okamoto N, Kurumatani N (2011) Impact of smoking on bone mineral density and bone metabolism in elderly men: the Fujiwara-kyo Osteoporosis Risk in Men (FORMEN) study. Osteoporos Int 22(1):133–141
Ward KD, Klesges RC (2001) A meta-analysis of the effects of cigarette smoking on bone mineral density. Calcif Tissue Int 68:259–270
Funding
No specific funding was received for this work. The NCHS is responsible only for the initial data, which this work is based upon. However, solely the authors are responsible for any analyses, interpretations, and conclusions described in the present work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceived research question, drafted the manuscript and supervised all aspects of the work: LB. Data analysis: DS, LB. Interpretation of results, critical manuscript revision for intellectual content, approval of final version of manuscript: all authors.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
DS and LB declare that they have no conflict of interest. TMG has received research grants from Novartis and speaker honoraria from Novartis, Ipsen, and Pfizer.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(PDF 166 kb).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Strozyk, D., Gress, T.M. & Breitling, L.P. Smoking and bone mineral density: comprehensive analyses of the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III). Arch Osteoporos 13, 16 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-018-0426-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-018-0426-8