Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Social inequalities in osteoporosis and fracture among community-dwelling older men and women: findings from the Hertfordshire cohort study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Osteoporosis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

It is unknown whether osteoporosis is socially patterned. Using data from the Hertfordshire Cohort Study we found no consistent evidence for social inequalities in prevalent or incident fracture, bone mineral density or loss rates, or bone strength. Public health strategies for prevention of osteoporosis should focus on the whole population.

Introduction

Osteoporosis and osteoporotic fracture are major public health issues for society; the burden for the affected individual is also high. It is unclear whether osteoporosis and osteoporotic fracture are socially patterned.

Objective

This study aims to analyse social inequalities in osteoporosis and osteoporotic fracture among the 3,225 community-dwelling men and women, aged 59–73 years, who participated in the Hertfordshire Cohort Study (HCS), UK.

Methods

A panel of markers of bone health (fracture since 45 years of age; DXA bone mineral density and loss rate at the total femur; pQCT strength strain indices for the radius and tibia; and incident fracture) were analysed in relation to the social circumstances of the HCS participants (characterised at the individual level by: age left full time education; current social class; housing tenure and car availability).

Results

We found little strong or consistent evidence among men, or women, for social inequalities in prevalent or incident fracture, DXA bone mineral density, bone loss rates, or pQCT bone strength, with or without adjustment for age, anthropometry, lifestyle and clinical characteristics.

Reduced car availability at baseline was associated with lower pQCT radius and tibia strength strain indices at follow-up among men only (p = 0.02 radius and p < 0.01 tibia unadjusted; p = 0.05 radius and p = 0.01 tibia, adjusted for age, anthropometry, lifestyle and clinical characteristics).

Conclusions

Our results suggest that fracture and osteoporosis do not have a strong direct social gradient and that public health strategies for prevention and treatment of osteoporosis should continue to focus on the whole population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Harvey N, Cooper C (2003) Determinants of fracture risk in osteoporosis. Curr Rheumatol Rep 5:75–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sambrook P, Cooper C (2006) Seminar on osteoporosis. Osteoporosis: trends in epidemiology, pathogenesis and treatment. Lancet 367:2010–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Melton LJ, III, Chrischilles EA, Cooper C, Lane AW, Riggs BL. How many women have osteoporosis? JBMR Anniversary Classic. JBMR, Volume 7, Number 9, 1992. J Bone Miner Res 2005 May;20:886-92.

  4. Kanis JA, Adams J, Borgstrom F, Cooper C, Jonsson B, Preedy D et al (2008) Modelling cost-effectiveness in osteoporosis. Bone 43:215–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Walker-Bone K, Dennison E, Cooper C (2001) Osteoporosis. In: Silman AJ, Hochberg M (eds) Epidemiology of the rheumatic diseases, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 259–92

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kanis JA, McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Strom O, Borgstrom F, Oden A (2009) How to decide who to treat. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 23(6):711–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Marmot M (2001) From Black to Acheson: two decades of concern with inequalities in health. A celebration of the 90th birthday of Professor Jerry Morris. Int J Epidemiol 30(5):1165–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Groffen DA, Bosma H, van den AM, Kempen GI, van Eijk JT (2008) Material deprivation and health-related dysfunction in older Dutch people: findings from the SMILE study. Eur J Public Health 18(3):258–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wilkinson RG (1997) Socioeconomic determinants of health. Health inequalities: relative or absolute material standards? BMJ 314(7080):591–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Brennan SL, Pasco JA, Urquhart DM, Oldenburg B, Wang Y, Wluka AE (2011) Association between socioeconomic status and bone mineral density in adults: a systematic review. Osteoporos Int 22(2):517–527, Date of Publication: February 2011(2):February

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Brennan SL, Pasco JA, Urquhart DM, Oldenburg B, Hanna F, Wluka AE (2009) The association between socioeconomic status and osteoporotic fracture in population-based adults: a systematic review. Osteoporos Int 20(9):1487–1497, Date of Publication: September 2009(9):September

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Syddall HE, Aihie SA, Dennison EM, Martin HJ, Barker DJ, Cooper C (2005) Cohort profile: the Hertfordshire cohort study. Int J Epidemiol 34(6):1234–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Arber S, Ginn J (1993) Gender and inequalities in health in later life. Soc Sci Med 36(1):33–46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wiggins RD, Joshi H, Bartley M, Gleave S, Lynch K, Cullis A (2002) Place and personal circumstances in a multilevel account of women's long-term illness. Soc Sci Med 54(5):827–38

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dallosso HM, Morgan K, Bassey EJ, Ebrahim SB, Fentem PH, Arie TH (1988) Levels of customary physical activity among the old and the very old living at home. J Epidemiol Community Health 42(2):121–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lohman TG, Roche AF, Martorell R (1988) Anthropometric standardization reference manual. Human Kinetic Books, Champaign

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dennison EM, Syddall HE, Sayer AA, Gilbody HJ, Cooper C (2005) Birth weight and weight at 1 year are independent determinants of bone mass in the seventh decade: the Hertfordshire cohort study. Pediatr Res 57(4):582–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dennison EM, Jameson KA, Syddall HE, Martin HJ, Cushnaghan J, Aihie SA et al (2010) Bone health and deterioration in quality of life among participants from the Hertfordshire cohort study. Osteoporos Int 21(11):1817–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Oliver H, Jameson KA, Sayer AA, Cooper C, Dennison EM (2007) Growth in early life predicts bone strength in late adulthood: the Hertfordshire cohort study. Bone 41(3):400–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Louis O, Soykens S, Willnecker J, Van den Winkel P, Osteaux M (1996) Cortical and total bone mineral content of the radius: accuracy of peripheral computed tomography. Bone 18(5):467–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sievanen H, Koskue V, Rauhio A, Kannus P, Heinonen A, Vuori I (1998) Peripheral quantitative computed tomography in human long bones: evaluation of in vitro and in vivo precision. J Bone Miner Res 13(5):871–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Office of Population Censuses and Surveys (1990) Standard occupational classification, Vol 1 Structure and definition of major, minor and unit groups. HMSO, London

    Google Scholar 

  23. Elias P, Halstead K, Prandy K (1993) Computer assisted standard occupational coding. HMSO, London

    Google Scholar 

  24. West J, Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland CAC, Price GM, Groom LM, Kendrick D et al (2004) Do rates of hospital admission for falls and hip fracture in elderly people vary by socio-economic status? Public Health 118(8):576–581, Date of Publication: Dec 2004(8):Dec

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Jones S, Johansen A, Brennan J, Butler J, Lyons RA (2004) The effect of socioeconomic deprivation on fracture incidence in the United Kingdom. Osteoporos Int 15(7):520–524, Date of Publication: Jul 2004(7):Jul

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Quah C, Boulton C, Moran C (2011) The influence of socioeconomic status on the incidence, outcome and mortality of fractures of the hip. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery—Series B 93 B(6):801–805, Date of Publication: June 2011(6):June

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hamilton T, Lambert S, Willett K. Proximal femoral fracture and socioeconomic status. Osteoporosis International Conference: Osteoporosis Conference 2010 Liverpool United Kingdom Conference Start: 20101128 Conference End: 20101201 Conference Publication: (var pagings) 21 (pp S515-S516), 2010 Date of Publication: November 2010(var.pagings):November.

  28. Dugue A, Greenbank C, Evans B, Diggle P, Goodson N, Halsey J, et al. Increasing deprivation and osteoporosis: Further analysis adjusting for geographical and physical variables. Rheumatology Conference: Rheumatology 2010—British Society for Rheumatology, BSR and British Health Professionals in Rheumatology, BHPR Annual Meeting 2010 Birmingham United Kingdom Conference Start: 20100420 Conference End: 20100423 Conference Publi(var.pagings):April

  29. Court-Brown, Aitken SA, Ralston SH, McQueen MM (2011) The relationship of fall-related fractures to social deprivation. Osteoporos Int 22(4):1211–1218, Date of Publication: April 2011(4):Apri

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Clark E, Cuming M, Gould V, Morrison L, Tobias J. Risk factors for fractures over aged 50 in a population-based cohort of older women. Osteoporosis International Conference: Osteoporosis Conference 2010 Liverpool United Kingdom Conference Start: 20101128 Conference End: 20101201 Conference Publication: (var pagings) 21 (pp S446-S447), 2010 Date of Publication: November 2010(var.pagings):November

  31. Zingmond DS, Soohoo NF, Silverman SL (2006) The role of socioeconomic status on hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 17(10):1562–1568, Date of Publication: Oct 2006(10):Oct

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Farahmand BY, Persson P-G, Michaelsson K, Baron JA, Parker MG, Ljunghall S (2000) Socioeconomic status, marital status and hip fracture risk: a population-based case–control study. Osteoporos Int 11(9):803–808, Date of Publication: 2000(9):2000

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Johnell O, Borgstrom F, Jonsson B, Kanis J (2007) Latitude, socioeconomic prosperity, mobile phones and hip fracture risk. Osteoporos Int 18(3):333–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Hokby A, Reimers A, Laflamme L (2003) Hip fractures among older people: do marital status and type of residence matter? Public Health 117(3):196–201

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Vestergaard P, Rejnmark L, Mosekilde L (2006) Socioeconomic aspects of fractures within universal public healthcare: a nationwide case–control study from Denmark. Scand J Public Health 34(4):371–377, Date of Publication: Aug 2006(4):Aug

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang M-C, Dixon LB (2006) Socioeconomic influences on bone health in postmenopausal women: findings from NHANES III, 1988–1994. Osteoporos Int 17(1):91–98, Date of Publication: Jan 2006(1):Jan

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Varenna M, Binelli L, Zucchi F, Ghiringhelli D, Gallazzi M, Sinigaglia L (1999) Prevalence of osteoporosis by educational level in a cohort of postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 9(3):236–241, Date of Publication: 1999(3):1999

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Wilson RT, Chase GA, Chrischilles EA, Wallace RB (2006) Hip fracture risk among community-dwelling elderly people in the United States: a prospective study of physical, cognitive, and socioeconomic indicators. Am J Public Health 96(7):1210–1218, Date of Publication: Jul 2006(7):Jul

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Benzeval M, Judge K, Smaje C (1995) Beyond class, race, and ethnicity: deprivation and health in Britain. Health Serv Res 30(1 Pt 2):163–77

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Clark EM, Ness A, Tobias JH (2005) Social position affects bone mass in childhood through opposing actions on height and weight. J Bone Miner Res 20(12):2082–2089, Date of Publication: Dec 2005(12):Dec

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Bartley M, Blane D (1994) Socioeconomic deprivation in Britain. Appropriateness of deprivation indices must be ensured. BMJ 309(6967):1479

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. APHO and Department of Health. Health Profile 2008—Hertfordshire. http://www apho org uk/resource/item aspx?RID = 52400 2008

  43. Ismail AA, O'Neill TW, Cockerill W, Finn JD, Cannata JB, Hoszowski K et al (2000) Validity of self-report of fractures: results from a prospective study in men and women across Europe. EPOS study group. European prospective osteoporosis study group. Osteoporos Int 11(3):248–54

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Medical Research Council & University of Southampton UK.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Holly E. Syddall.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Syddall, H.E., Evandrou, M., Dennison, E.M. et al. Social inequalities in osteoporosis and fracture among community-dwelling older men and women: findings from the Hertfordshire cohort study. Arch Osteoporos 7, 37–48 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-012-0069-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-012-0069-0

Keywords

Navigation