Skip to main content
Log in

Heat Transfer and Flow Resistance Characteristics of Helical Baffle Heat Exchangers with Twisted Oval Tube

  • Published:
Journal of Thermal Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To overcome the defect of the significant increase in pressure drop when the heat transfer performance of helical baffle heat exchanger is improved, a novel helical baffle heat exchanger with twisted oval tube is proposed. Numerical simulation was done to exhibit the shell side heat transfer and flow characteristics with CFD software Fluent. The field synergy principle was used to evaluate the shell side performance. The results show that the flow velocity distribution on the shell side of the spiral baffle heat exchanger is more uniform and the velocity near the tube wall increases in the range of research parameters, as the circular tube is replaced by a twisted elliptical tube with the same perimeter length. Moreover, the helical baffle heat exchanger with twisted oval tube has better field synergy of velocity and temperature gradient, velocity and pressure gradient. The helical baffle heat exchanger with helix angle of 15° has better performance than that of circular tube, and its heat transfer coefficient is improved about 3.3% and pressure drop is reduced by 17.1%–19.1%. Hence, the comprehensive heat transfer performance is improved by 21.5%–22.5%. When the helix angle is 20°, the comprehensive heat transfer performance is increased by 16.1%–18.0% with heat transfer coefficient improvement of 3.6% and pressure drop reduction of 13.9%–16.5%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A :

The length of the long axis of the elliptical tube/mm

A t :

cross-sectional area of the twisted elliptical tube/m2

B :

The length of the short axis of the elliptical tube/mm

B p :

The period length of the baffle/mm

C :

Round tube

C 1 :

Coefficient of experience

D :

Bore diameter/mm

d e :

The diameter of the round tube/mm

f :

2esistance coefficient

G k :

Turbulent kinetic energy from average velocity gradients/J·s−1

H :

Baffle thickness/mm

k :

Turbulent energy/J

S i,S h :

Source item

L :

Cross-sectional circumference of the twisted elliptical tube/m

N :

Number of cycles of twisted tube within a periodic full-section model

Nu :

Nusselt number

P :

Pressure/Pa

p :

Pressure gradien/Pa·m−1

Re s :

Reynolds number of the shell side

S :

The period length of the twisted elliptical tube/mm

SD:

The standard deviation of the velocity

T :

Twisted elliptical tube

T :

Temperature gradient/K·m−1

t p :

Tube pitch/mm

U :

Speed vector/m·s−2

α :

Synergy angle of velocity vector and temperature gradient/(°)

β :

Synergy angle of velocity vector and pressure gradient/(°)

ε :

turbulent energy dissipation rate

θ :

Helix angle of the spiral baffle/(°)

λ eff :

Effective thermal conductivity

μ :

Fluid dynamic viscosity/Pa·s−1

υ :

fluid viscosity coefficient/m2·s−1

ρ :

Density/kg·m−3

σ k :

The Prandtl number corresponding to k

σ ε :

The Prandtl number corresponding to ε

References

  1. Gu X., Zheng Z.Y., Xiong X.C., et al., Characteristics of fluid flow and heat transfer in the shell side of the trapezoidal-like tilted baffles heat exchanger. Journal of Thermal Science, 2018, 27(06): 100–108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11630-018-1080-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Xiao K., Zhang J.W., Yu Y., Development and prospect of tube and shell heat exchangers. Contemporary Chemical Industry, 2015, 44(12): 2821–2824. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13840/j.cnki.cn21-1457/tq.2015.12.028.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Gu X., Luo Y.K., Xiong X.C., et al., Numerical and experimental investigation of the heat exchanger with trapezoidal baffle. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2018, 127: 598–606. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.07.045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yan Z., Chen X.J., Study on synergetic development strategy of energy and environment in the 13th five—year—planning. Environment & Sustainable Development, 2017, 42(02): 31–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19758/j.cnki.issn1673-288x.2017.02.009.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ma Y., Xie G.N., Hooman K., Review of printed circuit heat exchangers and its application in solar thermal energy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2022, 155: 11933. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Guo S.P., Liu Q.B., Sun J., et al., A review on the utilization of hybrid renewable energy. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, 91: 1121–1147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang, R.L., Sun J., Hong H., et al., Comprehensive evaluation for different modes of solar-aided coal-fired power generation system under common framework regarding both coal-savability and efficiency-promotability. Energy, 2018, 143: 151–167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.10.085.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yu P., Zheng Z.J., Jin W., Research progress in application of nanofluids in heat exchanger field. Modern Chemical Industry, 2018, 38(06): 43–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16606/j.cnki.issn0253-4320.2018.06.010.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yeom S., Eoh J., Hong J., et al., Experimental evaluation of helical-type sodium-to-air heat exchanger performance for thermal sizing design code validation. Nuclear Technology, 2016, 196(2): 338–345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13182/NT16-30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Li L., Sun J., Li Y.S., et al., Transient characteristics of a parabolic trough direct-steam-generation process. Renewable Energy, 2019, 135: 800–810. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.12.058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sun J., Liu Q.B., Hong H., Numerical study of parabolic-trough direct steam generation loop in recirculation mode: Characteristics, performance and general operation strategy. Energy Conversion & Management, 2015, 96: 287–302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2015.02.080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gu X., Zheng Z.Y., Luo Y.K., et al., Optimization on shell side structure of twisty flow heat exchanger based on orthogonal experiment. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2019, 38(4): 1688–1695. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2018-1364.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wang Q.W., Cheng G.D., Cheng Q.Y., et al., Review of improvements on shell-and-tube heat exchangers with helical baffles. Heat Transfer Engineering, 2010, 31(10): 836–853. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01457630903547602.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lei Y.G., Song C.F., Jing S.L., Construction of curriculum system of the core course group of cold and heat sources of buildings. Journal of Architectural Education in Institutions of Higher Learning, 2018, 27(03): 82–86.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wu X., Song Z.X., Jiang X.B., et al., Research progress on heat exchanger network considering heat transfer enhancement of shell-and-tube exchangers. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2018, 37(04): 1267–1275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2017-2614.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tian L.T., Li S., Cui Z.Q., et al., Experimental study on heat transfer characteristics of microencapsulated phase change material suspensions in circular tube. Journal of Engineering for Thermal Energy and Power, 2018, 33(10): 16–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16146/j.cnki.rndlgc.2018.10.003.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lin W.Z., Cao J.H., Fang X.M., et al., Research progress of heat transfer enhancement of shell-and-tube heat exchanger. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2018, 37(04): 1276–1286. DOI:https://doi.org/10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2017-2483.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tao X.Y., Mo C.P., Wang W.L., et al., Research overview of baffle plate effect on the performance of shell and tube heat exchangers. Chemical Engineering & Machinery, 2019, 46(02): 112–114, 130.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gu X., Wang T.T., Chen W.J., et al., Multi-objective optimization on structural parameters of torsional flow heat exchanger. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2019, 161: 113831. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.113831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lutcha J., Nemcansky J., Performance improvement of tubular heat exchangers by helical baffle. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 1990, 68(3): 263–270.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wen J., Zang H.Z., Wang S.M., et al., PIV experimental investigation on shell-side flow patterns of shell and tube heat exchanger with different helical baffles. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2017, 104: 247–259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.08.048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yang J.F., Lin Y.S., Ke H.B., et al., Investigation on combined multiple shell-pass shell-and-tube heat exchanger with continuous helical baffles. Energy, 2016, 115: 1572–1579. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.05.090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Xu X.H., Guo J.H., Lei Y.G., et al., Heat Transfer and Flow Resistance Performance of a Double Shell-Pass Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchanger. Journal of Engineering for Thermal Energy and Power, 2018, 33(12): 20–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16146/j.cnki.rndlgc.2018.12.003.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dzyubenko B.V., Ashmantas L.V., Segal M.D., Modeling and Design of Twisted Tube Heat Exchangers, New York: BegellHouse.Inc, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zhu D.S., Tan X.H., Zeng L.D. Heat transfer and pressure drop performances of twisted oval tubes. Chemical Engineering (China), 2013, 41(1): 9–14. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tang X.Y., Dai X.F., Zhu D.S. Experimental and numerical investigation of convective heat transfer and fluid flow in twisted spiral tube. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2015, 90: 523–541. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.06.068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Eiamsa-ard S., Promthaisong P., Thianpong C., et al., Influence of three-start spirally twisted tube combined with triple-channel twisted tape insert on heat transfer enhancement. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 2016, 102: 117–129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2016.01.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gu X., Dong Q.W., Liu M.S. The application of numerical simulation of periodic model in shell type heat exchanger. Journal of Engineering for Thermal Energy and Power, 2008, 23(1): 64–68.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Yang J.F., Zeng M., Wang Q.W. Numerical investigation on combined single shell-pass shell-and-tube heat exchanger with tow-layer continous helical baffle. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2015, 84: 103–113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2014.12.042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ji S., Mechanism analysis and performance study of flow and heat transfer in shell-side of shell-and-tube heat exchanger with helical baffles, Shandong University, 2011.

  31. Guo Z.Y., Principle of field coordination in heat exchangers and its applications. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2003, 39(12): 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. He Y.L., Lei Y.G., Tian L.T., et al., An Analysis of three-field synergy on heat transfer augmentation with low penalty of pressure drop. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2009, 30(11): 1904–1906.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants No. 21776263, 51706208).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dongwei Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gu, X., Zheng, Z., Xiong, X. et al. Heat Transfer and Flow Resistance Characteristics of Helical Baffle Heat Exchangers with Twisted Oval Tube. J. Therm. Sci. 31, 370–378 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11630-022-1581-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11630-022-1581-1

Keywords

Navigation