Skip to main content
Log in

Segmentation of high spatial resolution remote sensing images of mountainous areas based on the improved mean shift algorithm

  • Published:
Journal of Mountain Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Using conventional Mean Shift Algorithm to segment high spatial resolution Remote sensing images of mountainous areas usually leads to an unsatisfactory result, due to its rich texture information. In this paper, we propose an improved Mean Shift Algorithm in consideration of the characteristics of these images. First, images were classified into several homogeneous color regions and texture regions by conducting variance detection on the color space. Next, each homogeneous color region was directly segmented to generate the preliminary results by applying the Mean Shift Algorithm. For each texture region, we conduct a high-dimensional feature space by extracting information such as color, texture and shape comprehensively, and work out a proper bandwidth according to the normalized distribution density. Then the bandwidth variable Mean Shift Algorithm was applied to obtain segmentation results by conducting the pattern classification in feature space. Last, the final results were obtained by merging these regions by means of the constructed cost functions and removing the over-segmented regions from the merged regions. It has been experimentally segmented on the high spatial resolution remote sensing images collected by Quickbird and Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV). We put forward an approach to evaluate the segmentation results by using the segmentation matching index (SMI). This takes into consideration both the area and the spectrum. The experimental results suggest that the improved Mean Shift Algorithm outperforms the conventional one in terms of accuracy of segmentation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrea S, Albert R (2009) Texture and scale in Object-Based analysis of subdecimeter resolution Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 47(3): 761–769. DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2008.2009355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rango A, Laliberte A (2010) Impact of flight regulations on effective use of unmanned aircraft systems for natural resources applications. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing 4(1): 043539. DOI: 10.1117/I.JRS.1.3474649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma L, Cheng L, Han WQ, et al. (2014) Cultivated land information extraction from high-resolution unmanned aerial vehicle imagery data. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing 8(1): 083673. DOI: 10.1117/I.JRS.8.083673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arvor D, Durieux L, Andres S, et al. (2013) Advances in Geographic Object-Based Image Analysis with ontologies: A review of main contributions and limitations from a remote sensing perspective. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 82(8): 125–137. DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2013.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu EQ, Zhou WC, Zhou JM, et al. (2013) Combining spectral with texture features into object-oriented classification in mountainous terrain using advanced land observing satellite image. Journal of Mountain Science 10(5): 768–776. DOI: 10.1007/s11629-013-2532-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma L, Cheng L, Li MC, et al. (2015) Training set size, scale, and features in Geographic Object-Based Image Analysis of very high resolution unmanned aerial vehicle imagery. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 102(5): 14–27. DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.12.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laliberte AS, Rango A (2011) Image processing and classification procedures for analysis of sub-decimeter imagery acquired with an unmanned aircraft over arid rangelands. GIScience & Remote Sensing 48(1): 4–23. DOI: 10.2747/1548-1603.48.1.4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng L, Tong LH, Liu YX, et al. (2013) Fusion of laser scanning data and optical high-resolution imagery for accurate building boundary derivation. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing 7(1): 073570. DOI: 10.1117/1.JRS.7.073570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim KI, Jung K, Kim JH (2003) Texture-based approach for text detection in images using support vector machines and continuously adaptive Mean Shift Algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 25(12): 1631–1639. DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2003.1251157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debeir O, Van P, Kiss R (2005) Tracking of migrating cells under phase-contrast video microscopy with combined meanshift processes. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 24(6): 697–711. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2005.846851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen J, Liu JP, Lin XG, et al. (2011) Cropland extraction from very high spatial resolution satellite imagery by object-based classification using improved Mean Shift and one-class support vector machines. Sensor Letter 9(3): 997–1005. DOI: 10.1166/sl.2011.1361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukunaga K, Hostetler L (1975) The estimation of the gradient of a density function, with application in pattern recognition. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 21(1): 32–40. DOI: 10.1109/TIT.1975.1055330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comaniciu D, Meer P (1999) Distribution free decomposition of multivariate data. Pattern Analysis and Applications 2(1): 22–30. DOI: 10.1007/s100440050011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comaniciu D, Meer P (2002) Mean Shift: A robust approach toward feature space analysis. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 24(5): 603–619. DOI: 10.1109/34.1000236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng Y (1995) Mean Shift, Mode Seeking, and Clustering. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 17(8):790–799. DOI: 10.1109/34.400568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fardin AT, Golshah N, Alfred M (2006) Scalable multiresolution color image segmentation. Signal Processing 86:1670–1687. DOI: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2005.09.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tao WB, Jin H, Zhang Y (2007) Color image segmentation based on Mean Shift and normalized cuts. IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part B: Cybernetics 37(5): 1382–1389. DOI: 10.1109/TSMCB.2007.902249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saragih JM, Lucey S, Cohn JF (2011) Deformable model fitting by regularized landmark mean-shift. International Journal of Computer Vision 91(2): 200–215. DOI: 10.1007/s11263-010-0380-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li F, Peng JX (2003) Wold-Based remote sensing image segmentation. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica 32(4): 330–333. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao PF, Feng XZ, Zhao SH, et al. (2007) Segmentation of highresolution remotely sensed imagery based on phase congruency. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica 36(2): 146–151. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Park B, Marron JS (1990) Comparison of data-driven bandwidth selectors. Journal of the America Statistical Associstion 85: 66–72. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1990.10475307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bareche A, Djamil A (2014) Interest of boundary kernel density techniques in evaluating an approximation error of queueing systems characteristics. International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences 2014: 871357. DOI: 10.1155/2014/871357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li M, Dong ZB, Zhang ZC (2015) Calculation of the aeolian sediment flux-density profile based on estimation of the kernel density. Aeolian Research 16(3): 49–54. DOI: 10.1016/j.aeolia.2014.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trcmeau A, Colantoni P (2000) Regions adjacency graph applied to color image segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 9(4): 735–744. DOI: 10.1109/83.841950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foody GM (2002) Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment. Remote Sensing of Environment 80(1): 185–201. DOI: 10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00295-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee I, Estivill V (2006) Fast cluster polygonization and its applications in data-rich environments Geoinformatica 10(4): 399–422. DOI: 10.1007/s10707-006-0340-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Congalton RG, Green K (2010) Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data: principles and practices. Photogrammetric Record 25(130): 204–205. DOI: 10.1111/phor.2010.25.issue-130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mostapha MH, Daniele DV, Fabio D (2015) Phisical vulnerability proxies from remotes sensing: reviewing, implementing and disseminating selected techniques. GIScience & Remote Sensing 3(1):20–33. DOI: 10.1109/MGRS.2015.2398672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu H, Zhang SQ, Kong B (2010) Optimal segmentation scale selection for object-oriented remote sensing image classification. Journal of Image and Graphics 15(2): 352–360. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Neubert M, Herold H (2008) Assessment of remote sensing image segmentation quality. Proceedings GEOBIA 2008, Calgary, Canada. Available online at: http://www.ucalgary.ca/geobia/Publishing (Accessed on 7 May 2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chao Liu.

Additional information

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3649-0983

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5235-4025

http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2037-1282

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1900-2837

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lu, H., Liu, C., Li, Nw. et al. Segmentation of high spatial resolution remote sensing images of mountainous areas based on the improved mean shift algorithm. J. Mt. Sci. 12, 671–681 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-014-3332-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-014-3332-6

Keywords

Navigation