Skip to main content
Log in

Mapping the risk of water erosion in the watershed of the Ningxia-Inner Mongolia reach of the Yellow River, China

  • Published:
Journal of Mountain Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mapping and assessing soil-erosion risk can address the likelihood of occurrence of erosion as well as its consequences. This in turn provides precautionary and relevant suggestions to assist in disaster reduction. Because soil erosion by water in the watershed of the Ningxia-Inner Mongolia reach of the Yellow River is closely related to silting of the upper reaches of the Yellow River, it is necessary to assess erosion risk in this watershed. This study aims to identify the soil-erosion risk caused by water in the watershed of the Ningxia-Inner Mongolia reach of the Yellow River from 2001 to 2010. Empirical models called Chinese Soil Loss Equation (CSLE) and Modified Universal Soil Loss Equation (MUSLE) were used to predict the erosion modulus in slope surfaces and gullies. Then the soil erosion risk in this watershed was assessed according to the classification criteria of soil erosion intensities (SL190–2007). The study results showed that the range of values of the erosion modulus in this watershed was 0–44,733 t/km2/a. More than 20% of the total watershed area was found to present an erosion risk, with the regions at risk mainly located in channels and their upper reaches, and in mountainous areas. To determine the regression coefficients of the erosion factors with respect to erosion modulus, a GWR (geographically weighted regression) was carried out using the ArcGIS software. It was found that the topographic factor has the highest contribution rate to the soil erosion modulus, while the highest contribution rate of the erosion factors to the erosion modulus and the largest values of the factors were not located in the same places. Based on this result, the authors propose that slope management is the most important task in preventing soil loss in this watershed, and the soil-conservation projects should be built according to the contribution rate of the erosion factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  • Boardman J, Poesen J (2006) Soil erosion in Europe: major processes, causes and consequences. In: Boardman J, Poesen J, (eds.), Soil Erosion in Europe. Chichester. England: Wiley. DOI: 10.1002/0470859202.ch36.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cebecauer T, Jaroslav Hofierka J (2008) The consequences of land-cover changes on soil erosion distribution in Slovakia. Geomorphology 98: 187–198. DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.12.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng L, Yang QK, Xie HX, et al. (2009) GIS and CSEL based quantitative assessment of soil erosion in Shaanxi, China. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 23(5): 61–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai, YM (2008) Key technology of water and sediment regulation of reservoirs on the main stream of the Yellow River and revised operation mode of Longyangxia Reservoir and Liujiaxia Reservoir. Research Report of Yellow River Institute of Hydraulic Research, Yellow River Conservancy Commission. p 84.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong SM, Paracchini ML, Bertolo F, et al. (1999) Regional assessment of soil erosion using the distributed model SEMMED and remotely sensed data. Catena 37(3–4): 291–308. DOI: 10.1016/S0341-8162(99)00038-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu BJ, Zhao WW, Chen LX, et al. (2006) Evaluation index of soil erosion in different scales. Chinese Science Bulletin 51(16): 1936–1943.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm M, Jones RJA, Rusco E, et al. (2003) Soil erosion risk in Italy: a revised USLE approach. European Soil Bureau Research Report No.11, EUR 20677 EN, p.28. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickey RJ (2000) Slope angle and slope length solutions for GIS. Cartography (Canberra) 39(1): 1–8. DOI: 10.1080/00690805.2000.9714334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu LJ, Li R, Yang QK (2001) Region caled water erosion assessment based on GIS. Acta Pedological Sinica 38(2): 167–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jager S (1994) Modelling regional soil erosion susceptibility using the USLE and GIS. In: Rickson (ed.), Conserving Soil resources: European Perspectives. Wallingford: CAB International. pp 161–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jetten V, Govers G, Hessel R (2003) Erosion models: quality of spatial predictions. Hydrological Processes 17: 887–900. DOI: 10.1002/hyp.1168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiao JY, Wang WZ, Li J, et al. (2001) Soil and water conservation benefit of warping dams in hilly and gully regions on the Leoss Plateau. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment 15(1): 78–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang LL, Bao H, Liu LB, et al. (2005) Analysis and confirm of the indexes of water storage and sediment trapping on the terrace of different type regions at the Loess Plateau. Science of Soil and Water Conservation 3(2): 51–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kheir RB, Cerdan O, Abdallah C (2006) Regional soil erosion risk mapping in Lebanon. Geomorphology 82: 347–359. DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.05.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkby M, King D (1999) Summary report on provisional RDI erosion risk map for France. Report on contract to the European Soil Bureau (unpublished).

    Google Scholar 

  • Laflen JM, Moldenhauer WC (2003) Pioneering soil erosion prediction: the USLE story. World Association of Soil & Water Conservation, Special Publ. 1, WASWC, Thailand. p 43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li M, Li ZB, Liu PL (2002) Development of quantitative research on soil erosion in China. Research of Soil and Water Conservation 9(3): 243–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Zheng XM (1995) Analysis on erosion reduction mechanism and sediment reduction function of check dam. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation 15(2): 33–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu BY, Zhang KL, Xie Y (2002) An empirical soil loss equation. Proceeding 12th International Soil Conservation Organization Conference, Vol. II: process of soil erosion and its environment effect. Tsinghua University Press, Beijing, China. pp 21–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merritt W, Letcher R, Jakeman A (2003) A review of erosion and sediment transport models. Environmental Modelling & Software 18: 761–799. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(03)00078-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Water Resources of the People’s Republic of China (2007) Classification criterions of soil erosion intensities (SL190–2007). China WaterPower Press, Beijing, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Water Resources of the People’s Republic of China (1991) The Frist National Remote Sensing Survey of Soil Loss. China WaterPower Press, Beijing, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Water Resources of the People’s Republic of China (2001) The Second National Remote Sensing Survey of Soil Loss. China WaterPower Press, Beijing, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Water Resources of the People’s Republic of China (2005) The Third National Remote Sensing Survey of Soil Loss. China WaterPower Press, Beijing, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nekhay O, Arriaza M, Boerboom L (2009) Evaluation of soil erosion risk using Analytic Network Process and GIS: A case study from Spanish mountain olive plantations. Journal of Environmental Management 90: 3091–3104. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.04.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2008) Environmental Performance of Agriculture at a Glance OECD Publications, Paris. p. 126. Available online: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/61/28/40953155.pdf. (Accessed on 28 June 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasuhn V, Liniger H, Gisler S, et al. (2013) A high-resolution soil erosion risk map of Switzerland as strategic policy support system. Land Use Policy 32: 281–291. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.11.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poesen JWA, Hooke JM (1997) Erosion, flooding and channel management in Mediterranean environments of southern Europe. Press in Physical Geography 21: 157–199. DOI: 10.1177/030913339702100201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ran DC, Luo QH, Wang H, et al. (2004) Effect of soil-retaining dams on flood and sediment reduction in middle reaches of Yellow River. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 5: 7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renard KG, Foster GR, Yoder DC, et al. (1994) RUSLE revisited: status, question, answers, and the future. Journal of Soil and Water Conversation 49(3): 213–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renard KG, Foster GR, Weesies GA, et al. (1997) Predicting soil erosion by water: a guide to conservation planning with the revised universal soil loss equation (RESUL). US Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Handbook No. 703, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Der Knijff JM, Jones RJA, Montanarella L (1999) Soil erosion risk assessment in Italy. European Soil Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Der Knijff JM, Jones RJA, Montanarella L (2000) Soil erosion risk assessment in Europe. EUR 9044 EN. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. p 44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Rompaey AJJ, Bazzoffi P, Jones R (2003) Validation of soil erosion risk assessments in Italy. European Soil Bureau Research. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Report No.12, EUR 20676 EN. p 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams JR (1995) Chapter 25: the EPIC model. In: Singh VP (ed.), Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology. Water Resource Publication LLC, Englewood, Colorado, USA. pp 909–1000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wischmeier WH, Smith DD (1965) Predicting rainfall-erosion losses from cropland east of the Rocky Mountains: guide for selection of practices for soil and water conservation. In: USDA Agricultural Handbook No. 282: ARS, Washington DC, USA. p 47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu Q, Wang MY (2007) A framework for risk assessment on soil erosion by water using an integrated and systematic approach. Journal of Hydrology 337: 11–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie HX (2008) Study on the Spatio-temporal Change of Soil Loss and on the Assessment of Impact on Environment of Soil and Water Conservation in Yanhe Basin. PHD Thesis, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an, China. p 54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu LF, Xu XG, Meng XW (2012) Risk assessment of soil erosion in different rainfall scenarios by RUSLE model coupled with Information Diffusion Model: A case study of Bohai Rim, China. Catena 100: 74–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y (1990) Prediction formula for regional soil erosion. Soil Transaction 27(1): 73–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoder D, Lown J (1995) The Future of RUSLE: inside the new revised universal soil loss equation. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 50(5): 484–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu D, Wang TW, Cai CF (2010) Rapid assessment of regional soil erosion based on fuxxy neural system and GIS. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering 26(1): 103–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Y, Zhang WB, Liu SH, et al. (2012) A batch computation method of soil erosion modulus in the Frist National Water Conservancy Survey-Design and application of water erosion modulus calculator based on CSLE and GIS. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation 32(5): 291–295.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to He-qiang Du.

Additional information

0000-002-3300-2921

0000-0003-1795-8656

0000-0003-1679-3968

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Du, Hq., Xue, X. & Wang, T. Mapping the risk of water erosion in the watershed of the Ningxia-Inner Mongolia reach of the Yellow River, China. J. Mt. Sci. 12, 70–84 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-013-2861-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-013-2861-8

Keywords

Navigation